Cargando…
Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196869 |
_version_ | 1783382375111065600 |
---|---|
author | Benditz, A. Pulido, L. Renkawitz, T. Schwarz, T. Grifka, J. Weber, M. |
author_facet | Benditz, A. Pulido, L. Renkawitz, T. Schwarz, T. Grifka, J. Weber, M. |
author_sort | Benditz, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical School (January-December 2015). The anonymous survey was performed from July 2016 to February 2017 with 252 students within an orthopaedic surgery course at University Medical School. After exclusion of (1) nonnative speakers and (2) incomplete forms, 233 samples were included. Practical education was regarded as the most important (n=160/68.7%) teaching method followed by Internet research (n=147/63.1%) as the most important teaching material, while traditional frontal teaching (n=19/8.2%) and e-books (n=11/4.7%) ranked last. The evaluation of gender-specific differences in the use of teaching materials showed that female students prefer to highlight text (p<0.0001) as well as a trend to Internet research (p=0.053) and small-group teaching (p=0.057). Despite some gender-specific differences, traditional learning methods retain their importance besides new learning possibilities such as Internet research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6304503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63045032019-01-09 Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? Benditz, A. Pulido, L. Renkawitz, T. Schwarz, T. Grifka, J. Weber, M. Biomed Res Int Research Article This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical School (January-December 2015). The anonymous survey was performed from July 2016 to February 2017 with 252 students within an orthopaedic surgery course at University Medical School. After exclusion of (1) nonnative speakers and (2) incomplete forms, 233 samples were included. Practical education was regarded as the most important (n=160/68.7%) teaching method followed by Internet research (n=147/63.1%) as the most important teaching material, while traditional frontal teaching (n=19/8.2%) and e-books (n=11/4.7%) ranked last. The evaluation of gender-specific differences in the use of teaching materials showed that female students prefer to highlight text (p<0.0001) as well as a trend to Internet research (p=0.053) and small-group teaching (p=0.057). Despite some gender-specific differences, traditional learning methods retain their importance besides new learning possibilities such as Internet research. Hindawi 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6304503/ /pubmed/30627548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196869 Text en Copyright © 2018 A. Benditz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Benditz, A. Pulido, L. Renkawitz, T. Schwarz, T. Grifka, J. Weber, M. Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? |
title | Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? |
title_full | Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? |
title_fullStr | Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? |
title_short | Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? |
title_sort | are there gender-dependent study habits of medical students in times of the world wide web? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benditza aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb AT pulidol aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb AT renkawitzt aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb AT schwarzt aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb AT grifkaj aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb AT weberm aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb |