Cargando…

Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?

This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benditz, A., Pulido, L., Renkawitz, T., Schwarz, T., Grifka, J., Weber, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196869
_version_ 1783382375111065600
author Benditz, A.
Pulido, L.
Renkawitz, T.
Schwarz, T.
Grifka, J.
Weber, M.
author_facet Benditz, A.
Pulido, L.
Renkawitz, T.
Schwarz, T.
Grifka, J.
Weber, M.
author_sort Benditz, A.
collection PubMed
description This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical School (January-December 2015). The anonymous survey was performed from July 2016 to February 2017 with 252 students within an orthopaedic surgery course at University Medical School. After exclusion of (1) nonnative speakers and (2) incomplete forms, 233 samples were included. Practical education was regarded as the most important (n=160/68.7%) teaching method followed by Internet research (n=147/63.1%) as the most important teaching material, while traditional frontal teaching (n=19/8.2%) and e-books (n=11/4.7%) ranked last. The evaluation of gender-specific differences in the use of teaching materials showed that female students prefer to highlight text (p<0.0001) as well as a trend to Internet research (p=0.053) and small-group teaching (p=0.057). Despite some gender-specific differences, traditional learning methods retain their importance besides new learning possibilities such as Internet research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6304503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63045032019-01-09 Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? Benditz, A. Pulido, L. Renkawitz, T. Schwarz, T. Grifka, J. Weber, M. Biomed Res Int Research Article This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical School (January-December 2015). The anonymous survey was performed from July 2016 to February 2017 with 252 students within an orthopaedic surgery course at University Medical School. After exclusion of (1) nonnative speakers and (2) incomplete forms, 233 samples were included. Practical education was regarded as the most important (n=160/68.7%) teaching method followed by Internet research (n=147/63.1%) as the most important teaching material, while traditional frontal teaching (n=19/8.2%) and e-books (n=11/4.7%) ranked last. The evaluation of gender-specific differences in the use of teaching materials showed that female students prefer to highlight text (p<0.0001) as well as a trend to Internet research (p=0.053) and small-group teaching (p=0.057). Despite some gender-specific differences, traditional learning methods retain their importance besides new learning possibilities such as Internet research. Hindawi 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6304503/ /pubmed/30627548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196869 Text en Copyright © 2018 A. Benditz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benditz, A.
Pulido, L.
Renkawitz, T.
Schwarz, T.
Grifka, J.
Weber, M.
Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
title Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
title_full Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
title_fullStr Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
title_full_unstemmed Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
title_short Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
title_sort are there gender-dependent study habits of medical students in times of the world wide web?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3196869
work_keys_str_mv AT benditza aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb
AT pulidol aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb
AT renkawitzt aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb
AT schwarzt aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb
AT grifkaj aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb
AT weberm aretheregenderdependentstudyhabitsofmedicalstudentsintimesoftheworldwideweb