Cargando…

Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience

OBJECTIVES: Congenital midline cervical cleft (CMCC) is a very uncommon congenital anomaly of the midline anterior neck, and although it has very pathognomonic features (including nipple-like protuberance), it could be mistaken for other congenital neck lesions, such as thyroglossal duct cyst and br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahakim, Abdullah, Francois, Martine, Van Den Abbeele, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5081540
_version_ 1783382394136428544
author Bahakim, Abdullah
Francois, Martine
Van Den Abbeele, Thierry
author_facet Bahakim, Abdullah
Francois, Martine
Van Den Abbeele, Thierry
author_sort Bahakim, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Congenital midline cervical cleft (CMCC) is a very uncommon congenital anomaly of the midline anterior neck, and although it has very pathognomonic features (including nipple-like protuberance), it could be mistaken for other congenital neck lesions, such as thyroglossal duct cyst and branchial apparatus anomalies. Thus, it represents a challenging diagnosis. In this 21-patient series, we discuss the clinical features of CMCC, its pathophysiology characteristics, and its modalities management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of children presenting with CMCC at our institution, between January 1998 and January 2016. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were identified with CMCC. Ages ranged between 1 day and 14 years. The length of the lesion varied from 0.5 to 5 cm, and the size of the skin tag varied from 0.2 to 1.5cm. No other significant associated anomalies were found. Surgery was the mainstay treatment, and no recurrence was found. W-plasty was used in most patients to close the defect. CONCLUSION: With a little more than 200 published cases, our series represents the largest series worldwide. The lesion is usually isolated, and no further investigation is required. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, with complete excision being usually curative. It should be treated at an early age to prevent complications. In our experience, W-plasty was a good alternative to the most commonly used Z-plasty, in skin closure, with respect to both aesthetic and functional results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6304584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63045842019-01-09 Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience Bahakim, Abdullah Francois, Martine Van Den Abbeele, Thierry Int J Otolaryngol Research Article OBJECTIVES: Congenital midline cervical cleft (CMCC) is a very uncommon congenital anomaly of the midline anterior neck, and although it has very pathognomonic features (including nipple-like protuberance), it could be mistaken for other congenital neck lesions, such as thyroglossal duct cyst and branchial apparatus anomalies. Thus, it represents a challenging diagnosis. In this 21-patient series, we discuss the clinical features of CMCC, its pathophysiology characteristics, and its modalities management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of children presenting with CMCC at our institution, between January 1998 and January 2016. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were identified with CMCC. Ages ranged between 1 day and 14 years. The length of the lesion varied from 0.5 to 5 cm, and the size of the skin tag varied from 0.2 to 1.5cm. No other significant associated anomalies were found. Surgery was the mainstay treatment, and no recurrence was found. W-plasty was used in most patients to close the defect. CONCLUSION: With a little more than 200 published cases, our series represents the largest series worldwide. The lesion is usually isolated, and no further investigation is required. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, with complete excision being usually curative. It should be treated at an early age to prevent complications. In our experience, W-plasty was a good alternative to the most commonly used Z-plasty, in skin closure, with respect to both aesthetic and functional results. Hindawi 2018-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6304584/ /pubmed/30627168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5081540 Text en Copyright © 2018 Abdullah Bahakim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bahakim, Abdullah
Francois, Martine
Van Den Abbeele, Thierry
Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience
title Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience
title_full Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience
title_fullStr Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience
title_full_unstemmed Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience
title_short Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft and W-Plasty: Our Experience
title_sort congenital midline cervical cleft and w-plasty: our experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5081540
work_keys_str_mv AT bahakimabdullah congenitalmidlinecervicalcleftandwplastyourexperience
AT francoismartine congenitalmidlinecervicalcleftandwplastyourexperience
AT vandenabbeelethierry congenitalmidlinecervicalcleftandwplastyourexperience