Cargando…

Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center

Background: Use of an in situ epidural catheter has been suggested to be efficient to provide anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). Reported epidural reactivation success rates vary from 74% to 92%. Predictors for reactivation failure include poor patient satisfaction with labor analgesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delgado, Carlos, Van Cleve, Wil, Kent, Christopher, Dinges, Emily, Bollag, Laurent A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613393
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16025.1
_version_ 1783382514411241472
author Delgado, Carlos
Van Cleve, Wil
Kent, Christopher
Dinges, Emily
Bollag, Laurent A.
author_facet Delgado, Carlos
Van Cleve, Wil
Kent, Christopher
Dinges, Emily
Bollag, Laurent A.
author_sort Delgado, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Background: Use of an in situ epidural catheter has been suggested to be efficient to provide anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). Reported epidural reactivation success rates vary from 74% to 92%. Predictors for reactivation failure include poor patient satisfaction with labor analgesia, increased delivery-to-reactivation time and the need for top-ups during labor. Some have suggested that this high failure rate precludes leaving the catheter in situ after delivery for subsequent reactivation attempts. In this study, we sought to evaluate the success rate of neuraxial techniques for PPTL and to determine if predictors of failure can be identified. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PPTL after vaginal delivery from July 2010 to July 2016 was conducted using CPT codes, yielding 93 records for analysis. Demographic, obstetric and anesthetic data (labor analgesia administration, length of epidural catheter in epidural space, top-up requirements, time of catheter reactivation, final anesthetic technique and corresponding doses for spinal and epidural anesthesia) were obtained. Results: A total of 70 patients received labor neuraxial analgesia. Reactivation was attempted in 33 with a success rate of 66.7%. Patient height, epidural volume of local anesthetic and administered fentanyl dose were lower in the group that failed reactivation. Overall, spinal anesthesia was performed in 60 patients, with a success rate of 80%. Conclusions: Our observed rate of successful postpartum epidural reactivation for tubal ligation was lower than the range reported in the literature. Our success rates for both spinal anesthesia and epidural reactivation for PPTL were lower than the generally accepted rates of successful epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. This gap may reflect a lower level of motivation on behalf of both the patients and anesthesia providers to tolerate “imperfect” neuraxial anesthesia once fetal considerations are removed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63052072019-01-03 Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center Delgado, Carlos Van Cleve, Wil Kent, Christopher Dinges, Emily Bollag, Laurent A. F1000Res Research Article Background: Use of an in situ epidural catheter has been suggested to be efficient to provide anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). Reported epidural reactivation success rates vary from 74% to 92%. Predictors for reactivation failure include poor patient satisfaction with labor analgesia, increased delivery-to-reactivation time and the need for top-ups during labor. Some have suggested that this high failure rate precludes leaving the catheter in situ after delivery for subsequent reactivation attempts. In this study, we sought to evaluate the success rate of neuraxial techniques for PPTL and to determine if predictors of failure can be identified. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PPTL after vaginal delivery from July 2010 to July 2016 was conducted using CPT codes, yielding 93 records for analysis. Demographic, obstetric and anesthetic data (labor analgesia administration, length of epidural catheter in epidural space, top-up requirements, time of catheter reactivation, final anesthetic technique and corresponding doses for spinal and epidural anesthesia) were obtained. Results: A total of 70 patients received labor neuraxial analgesia. Reactivation was attempted in 33 with a success rate of 66.7%. Patient height, epidural volume of local anesthetic and administered fentanyl dose were lower in the group that failed reactivation. Overall, spinal anesthesia was performed in 60 patients, with a success rate of 80%. Conclusions: Our observed rate of successful postpartum epidural reactivation for tubal ligation was lower than the range reported in the literature. Our success rates for both spinal anesthesia and epidural reactivation for PPTL were lower than the generally accepted rates of successful epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. This gap may reflect a lower level of motivation on behalf of both the patients and anesthesia providers to tolerate “imperfect” neuraxial anesthesia once fetal considerations are removed. F1000 Research Limited 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6305207/ /pubmed/30613393 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16025.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Delgado C et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Delgado, Carlos
Van Cleve, Wil
Kent, Christopher
Dinges, Emily
Bollag, Laurent A.
Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
title Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
title_full Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
title_fullStr Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
title_full_unstemmed Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
title_short Neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
title_sort neuraxial anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation at an academic medical center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613393
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16025.1
work_keys_str_mv AT delgadocarlos neuraxialanesthesiaforpostpartumtuballigationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT vanclevewil neuraxialanesthesiaforpostpartumtuballigationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT kentchristopher neuraxialanesthesiaforpostpartumtuballigationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT dingesemily neuraxialanesthesiaforpostpartumtuballigationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT bollaglaurenta neuraxialanesthesiaforpostpartumtuballigationatanacademicmedicalcenter