Cargando…

Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia

Background: Neurotypical young adults show task-based modulation and stability of their eye movements across tasks. This study aimed to determine whether persons with aphasia (PWA) modulate their eye movements and show stability across tasks similarly to control participants. Methods: Forty-eight PW...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Kimberly G., Schmidt, Joseph, Wang, Bin, Henderson, John M., Fridriksson, Julius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02430
_version_ 1783382538071310336
author Smith, Kimberly G.
Schmidt, Joseph
Wang, Bin
Henderson, John M.
Fridriksson, Julius
author_facet Smith, Kimberly G.
Schmidt, Joseph
Wang, Bin
Henderson, John M.
Fridriksson, Julius
author_sort Smith, Kimberly G.
collection PubMed
description Background: Neurotypical young adults show task-based modulation and stability of their eye movements across tasks. This study aimed to determine whether persons with aphasia (PWA) modulate their eye movements and show stability across tasks similarly to control participants. Methods: Forty-eight PWA and age-matched control participants completed four eye-tracking tasks: scene search, scene memorization, text-reading, and pseudo-reading. Results: Main effects of task emerged for mean fixation duration, saccade amplitude, and standard deviations of each, demonstrating task-based modulation of eye movements. Group by task interactions indicated that PWA produced shorter fixations relative to controls. This effect was most pronounced for scene memorization and for individuals who recently suffered a stroke. PWA produced longer fixations, shorter saccades, and less variable eye movements in reading tasks compared to controls. Three-way interactions of group, aphasia subtype, and task also emerged. Text-reading and scene memorization were particularly effective at distinguishing aphasia subtype. Persons with anomic aphasia showed a reduction in reading saccade amplitudes relative to their respective control group and other PWA. Persons with conduction/Wernicke’s aphasia produced shorter scene memorization fixations relative to controls or PWA of other subtypes, suggesting a memorization specific effect. Positive correlations across most tasks emerged for fixation duration and did not significantly differ between controls and PWA. Conclusion: PWA generally produced shorter fixations and smaller saccades relative to controls particularly in scene memorization and text-reading, respectively. The effect was most pronounced recently after a stroke. Selectively in reading tasks, PWA produced longer fixations and shorter saccades relative to controls, consistent with reading difficulty. PWA showed task-based modulation of eye movements, though the pattern of results was somewhat abnormal relative to controls. All subtypes of PWA also demonstrated task-based modulation of eye movements. However, persons with anomic aphasia showed reduced modulation of saccade amplitude and smaller reading saccades, possibly to improve reading comprehension. Controls and PWA generally produced stabile fixation durations across tasks and did not differ in their relationship across tasks. Overall, these results suggest there is potential to differentiate among PWA with varying subtypes and from controls using eye movement measures of task-based modulation, especially reading and scene memorization tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63053262019-01-07 Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia Smith, Kimberly G. Schmidt, Joseph Wang, Bin Henderson, John M. Fridriksson, Julius Front Psychol Psychology Background: Neurotypical young adults show task-based modulation and stability of their eye movements across tasks. This study aimed to determine whether persons with aphasia (PWA) modulate their eye movements and show stability across tasks similarly to control participants. Methods: Forty-eight PWA and age-matched control participants completed four eye-tracking tasks: scene search, scene memorization, text-reading, and pseudo-reading. Results: Main effects of task emerged for mean fixation duration, saccade amplitude, and standard deviations of each, demonstrating task-based modulation of eye movements. Group by task interactions indicated that PWA produced shorter fixations relative to controls. This effect was most pronounced for scene memorization and for individuals who recently suffered a stroke. PWA produced longer fixations, shorter saccades, and less variable eye movements in reading tasks compared to controls. Three-way interactions of group, aphasia subtype, and task also emerged. Text-reading and scene memorization were particularly effective at distinguishing aphasia subtype. Persons with anomic aphasia showed a reduction in reading saccade amplitudes relative to their respective control group and other PWA. Persons with conduction/Wernicke’s aphasia produced shorter scene memorization fixations relative to controls or PWA of other subtypes, suggesting a memorization specific effect. Positive correlations across most tasks emerged for fixation duration and did not significantly differ between controls and PWA. Conclusion: PWA generally produced shorter fixations and smaller saccades relative to controls particularly in scene memorization and text-reading, respectively. The effect was most pronounced recently after a stroke. Selectively in reading tasks, PWA produced longer fixations and shorter saccades relative to controls, consistent with reading difficulty. PWA showed task-based modulation of eye movements, though the pattern of results was somewhat abnormal relative to controls. All subtypes of PWA also demonstrated task-based modulation of eye movements. However, persons with anomic aphasia showed reduced modulation of saccade amplitude and smaller reading saccades, possibly to improve reading comprehension. Controls and PWA generally produced stabile fixation durations across tasks and did not differ in their relationship across tasks. Overall, these results suggest there is potential to differentiate among PWA with varying subtypes and from controls using eye movement measures of task-based modulation, especially reading and scene memorization tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6305326/ /pubmed/30618911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02430 Text en Copyright © 2018 Smith, Schmidt, Wang, Henderson and Fridriksson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Smith, Kimberly G.
Schmidt, Joseph
Wang, Bin
Henderson, John M.
Fridriksson, Julius
Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
title Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
title_full Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
title_fullStr Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
title_full_unstemmed Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
title_short Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
title_sort task-related differences in eye movements in individuals with aphasia
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02430
work_keys_str_mv AT smithkimberlyg taskrelateddifferencesineyemovementsinindividualswithaphasia
AT schmidtjoseph taskrelateddifferencesineyemovementsinindividualswithaphasia
AT wangbin taskrelateddifferencesineyemovementsinindividualswithaphasia
AT hendersonjohnm taskrelateddifferencesineyemovementsinindividualswithaphasia
AT fridrikssonjulius taskrelateddifferencesineyemovementsinindividualswithaphasia