Cargando…

Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Combining cognitive training (CT) with physical activity (CPT) has been suggested to be most effective in maintaining cognition in healthy older adults, but data are scarce and inconsistent regarding long-term effects (follow-up; FU) and predictors of success. Objective: To investigate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalbe, Elke, Roheger, Mandy, Paluszak, Kay, Meyer, Julia, Becker, Jutta, Fink, Gereon R., Kukolja, Juraj, Rahn, Andreas, Szabados, Florian, Wirth, Brunhilde, Kessler, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00407
_version_ 1783382540874153984
author Kalbe, Elke
Roheger, Mandy
Paluszak, Kay
Meyer, Julia
Becker, Jutta
Fink, Gereon R.
Kukolja, Juraj
Rahn, Andreas
Szabados, Florian
Wirth, Brunhilde
Kessler, Josef
author_facet Kalbe, Elke
Roheger, Mandy
Paluszak, Kay
Meyer, Julia
Becker, Jutta
Fink, Gereon R.
Kukolja, Juraj
Rahn, Andreas
Szabados, Florian
Wirth, Brunhilde
Kessler, Josef
author_sort Kalbe, Elke
collection PubMed
description Background: Combining cognitive training (CT) with physical activity (CPT) has been suggested to be most effective in maintaining cognition in healthy older adults, but data are scarce and inconsistent regarding long-term effects (follow-up; FU) and predictors of success. Objective: To investigate the 1-year FU effects of CPT versus CT and CPT plus counseling (CPT+C), and to identify predictors for CPT success at FU. Setting and Participants: We included 55 healthy older participants in the data analyses; 18 participants (CPT group) were used for the predictor analysis. Interventions: In a randomized controlled trial, participants conducted a CT, CPT, or CPT+C for 7 weeks. Outcome Measures: Overall cognition, verbal, figural, and working memory, verbal fluency, attention, planning, and visuo-construction. Results: While within-group comparisons showed cognitive improvements for all types of training, only one significant interaction Group × Time favoring CPT in comparison to CPT+C was found for overall cognition and verbal long-term memory. The most consistent predictor for CPT success (in verbal short-term memory, verbal fluency, attention) was an initial low baseline performance. Lower education predicted working memory gains. Higher levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and lower levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor at baseline (BDNF) predicted alternating letter verbal fluency gains. Discussion: Within-group comparisons indicate that all used training types are helpful to maintain cognition. The fact that cognitive and sociodemographic data as well as nerve growth factors predict long-term benefits of CPT contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying training success and may ultimately help to adapt training to individual profiles. Clinical Trial Registration: WHO ICTRP (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), identifier DRKS00005194.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63053382019-01-07 Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial Kalbe, Elke Roheger, Mandy Paluszak, Kay Meyer, Julia Becker, Jutta Fink, Gereon R. Kukolja, Juraj Rahn, Andreas Szabados, Florian Wirth, Brunhilde Kessler, Josef Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Combining cognitive training (CT) with physical activity (CPT) has been suggested to be most effective in maintaining cognition in healthy older adults, but data are scarce and inconsistent regarding long-term effects (follow-up; FU) and predictors of success. Objective: To investigate the 1-year FU effects of CPT versus CT and CPT plus counseling (CPT+C), and to identify predictors for CPT success at FU. Setting and Participants: We included 55 healthy older participants in the data analyses; 18 participants (CPT group) were used for the predictor analysis. Interventions: In a randomized controlled trial, participants conducted a CT, CPT, or CPT+C for 7 weeks. Outcome Measures: Overall cognition, verbal, figural, and working memory, verbal fluency, attention, planning, and visuo-construction. Results: While within-group comparisons showed cognitive improvements for all types of training, only one significant interaction Group × Time favoring CPT in comparison to CPT+C was found for overall cognition and verbal long-term memory. The most consistent predictor for CPT success (in verbal short-term memory, verbal fluency, attention) was an initial low baseline performance. Lower education predicted working memory gains. Higher levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and lower levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor at baseline (BDNF) predicted alternating letter verbal fluency gains. Discussion: Within-group comparisons indicate that all used training types are helpful to maintain cognition. The fact that cognitive and sociodemographic data as well as nerve growth factors predict long-term benefits of CPT contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying training success and may ultimately help to adapt training to individual profiles. Clinical Trial Registration: WHO ICTRP (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), identifier DRKS00005194. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6305338/ /pubmed/30618714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00407 Text en Copyright © 2018 Kalbe, Roheger, Paluszak, Meyer, Becker, Fink, Kukolja, Rahn, Szabados, Wirth and Kessler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kalbe, Elke
Roheger, Mandy
Paluszak, Kay
Meyer, Julia
Becker, Jutta
Fink, Gereon R.
Kukolja, Juraj
Rahn, Andreas
Szabados, Florian
Wirth, Brunhilde
Kessler, Josef
Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effects of a Cognitive Training With and Without Additional Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: A Follow-Up 1 Year After a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of a cognitive training with and without additional physical activity in healthy older adults: a follow-up 1 year after a randomized controlled trial
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00407
work_keys_str_mv AT kalbeelke effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rohegermandy effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paluszakkay effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meyerjulia effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT beckerjutta effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT finkgereonr effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kukoljajuraj effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rahnandreas effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT szabadosflorian effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wirthbrunhilde effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kesslerjosef effectsofacognitivetrainingwithandwithoutadditionalphysicalactivityinhealthyolderadultsafollowup1yearafterarandomizedcontrolledtrial