Cargando…

Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy

Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bustangi, Nasir, Kallas Chemaly, Anthony, Scalabre, Aurelien, Khelif, Karim, Luyckx, Stéphane, Steyaert, Henri, Varlet, Francois, Lopez, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00388
_version_ 1783382562553462784
author Bustangi, Nasir
Kallas Chemaly, Anthony
Scalabre, Aurelien
Khelif, Karim
Luyckx, Stéphane
Steyaert, Henri
Varlet, Francois
Lopez, Manuel
author_facet Bustangi, Nasir
Kallas Chemaly, Anthony
Scalabre, Aurelien
Khelif, Karim
Luyckx, Stéphane
Steyaert, Henri
Varlet, Francois
Lopez, Manuel
author_sort Bustangi, Nasir
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) technique for the correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (VUR). Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 96 patients with VUR (69 females and 27 males) and deterioration of the renal function, underwent EVUR following LG technique. Fifty patients (16 males and 34 females) were operated by open surgery (group A). The mean age was 4.22 years-old, (14–147 months). Laparoscopic approach (group B) was performed in 46 patients (11 males and 35 females). The mean age was 4.19 years-old (15–110 months). We compared the results in relation to degree of VUR, operative time, hospital stay, post-operative pain medications, recovery time, complications, successful rate, recurrence, and follow-up. Statistical analysis was done used Chi square test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In both groups no correlation was identified between age or weight and operative time, length of stay or total analgesia used. The mean operative time for group A was 63.2 and 125.4 min for unilateral and bilateral VUR, respectively, and for the group B was 127.90 and 184.5 min, respectively. There was no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Perioperative mucosal perforation of the bladder occurred in 6 patients of group A and 4 patients of group B and was immediately repaired. One patient had to be reoperated for leakage in group B. The mean duration of Morphine, IV and PO analgesia was shorter in group B. The mean hospital stay was 5.46 days for group A and 1.54 days for Group B. The success rate was 98% in group A and 97, 8% in group B. The mean follow-up was 3.67 years for the open and 1.54 years for the laparoscopic group. Transitory voiding dysfunction occurred in bilateral EVUR in one case in each group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic or Open approach for the correction of VUR following Lich-Gregoir technique is effective in unilateral and bilateral VUR with similar results. Laparoscopic approach reduces significantly (p < 0.05 in each item) post-operative pain medication, hospital stay, and allows for a faster return to normal activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63054292019-01-07 Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy Bustangi, Nasir Kallas Chemaly, Anthony Scalabre, Aurelien Khelif, Karim Luyckx, Stéphane Steyaert, Henri Varlet, Francois Lopez, Manuel Front Pediatr Pediatrics Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) technique for the correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (VUR). Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 96 patients with VUR (69 females and 27 males) and deterioration of the renal function, underwent EVUR following LG technique. Fifty patients (16 males and 34 females) were operated by open surgery (group A). The mean age was 4.22 years-old, (14–147 months). Laparoscopic approach (group B) was performed in 46 patients (11 males and 35 females). The mean age was 4.19 years-old (15–110 months). We compared the results in relation to degree of VUR, operative time, hospital stay, post-operative pain medications, recovery time, complications, successful rate, recurrence, and follow-up. Statistical analysis was done used Chi square test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In both groups no correlation was identified between age or weight and operative time, length of stay or total analgesia used. The mean operative time for group A was 63.2 and 125.4 min for unilateral and bilateral VUR, respectively, and for the group B was 127.90 and 184.5 min, respectively. There was no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Perioperative mucosal perforation of the bladder occurred in 6 patients of group A and 4 patients of group B and was immediately repaired. One patient had to be reoperated for leakage in group B. The mean duration of Morphine, IV and PO analgesia was shorter in group B. The mean hospital stay was 5.46 days for group A and 1.54 days for Group B. The success rate was 98% in group A and 97, 8% in group B. The mean follow-up was 3.67 years for the open and 1.54 years for the laparoscopic group. Transitory voiding dysfunction occurred in bilateral EVUR in one case in each group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic or Open approach for the correction of VUR following Lich-Gregoir technique is effective in unilateral and bilateral VUR with similar results. Laparoscopic approach reduces significantly (p < 0.05 in each item) post-operative pain medication, hospital stay, and allows for a faster return to normal activity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6305429/ /pubmed/30619786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00388 Text en Copyright © 2018 Bustangi, Kallas Chemaly, Scalabre, Khelif, Luyckx, Steyaert, Varlet and Lopez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Bustangi, Nasir
Kallas Chemaly, Anthony
Scalabre, Aurelien
Khelif, Karim
Luyckx, Stéphane
Steyaert, Henri
Varlet, Francois
Lopez, Manuel
Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
title Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
title_full Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
title_fullStr Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
title_short Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
title_sort extravesical ureteral reimplantation following lich-gregoir technique for the correction of vesico-ureteral reflux retrospective comparative study open vs. laparoscopy
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00388
work_keys_str_mv AT bustanginasir extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT kallaschemalyanthony extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT scalabreaurelien extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT khelifkarim extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT luyckxstephane extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT steyaerthenri extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT varletfrancois extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy
AT lopezmanuel extravesicalureteralreimplantationfollowinglichgregoirtechniqueforthecorrectionofvesicoureteralrefluxretrospectivecomparativestudyopenvslaparoscopy