Cargando…

Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda

Bushpigs (Potamochoerus larvatus) are considered a nuisance to farmers because of their crop raiding habits. Through their incursions into farmlands, they may interact with free-ranging domestic pigs and potentially cause transmission of infectious diseases such as African Swine Fever (ASF). The rol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Ariane, Ogweng, Peter, Ojok, Alfred, Etter, Eric, Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle, Masembe, Charles, Ståhl, Karl, Jori, Ferran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619893
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00295
_version_ 1783382597198413824
author Payne, Ariane
Ogweng, Peter
Ojok, Alfred
Etter, Eric
Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle
Masembe, Charles
Ståhl, Karl
Jori, Ferran
author_facet Payne, Ariane
Ogweng, Peter
Ojok, Alfred
Etter, Eric
Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle
Masembe, Charles
Ståhl, Karl
Jori, Ferran
author_sort Payne, Ariane
collection PubMed
description Bushpigs (Potamochoerus larvatus) are considered a nuisance to farmers because of their crop raiding habits. Through their incursions into farmlands, they may interact with free-ranging domestic pigs and potentially cause transmission of infectious diseases such as African Swine Fever (ASF). The role of the bushpig in the epidemiology of ASF is poorly known and one of the gaps of knowledge is precisely the nature of interaction between bushpigs and domestic pigs. Thus, in this study, we investigated the frequency of bushpig visits to crop fields in rural communities where ASF is endemic, at the edge of a wildlife protected area in northwestern Uganda, to better understand the potential for interaction and disease transmission. We used three methods (questionnaires, camera traps, and observations for tracks) to assess bushpig visits to farmland. These methods were implemented concurrently in 28 farms during rainy and dry seasons. The results obtained by each of the three methods were analyzed by generalized linear mixed models. Potential risk factors including crop type, season, and landscape characteristics related to bushpig ecology were tested as explanatory variables. A generalized linear model and the Kendall test were used to compare the results and consistency of the frequency values obtained by the three methods. A high percentage (75%) of interviewed farmers reported visits from bushpigs in 29.6% of assessed crops (n = 145), and a frequency of 0.014 +/−0.05 visits per night was obtained through camera-trapping. Bushpig tracks were detected in 36% of sessions of observation. Cassava (Manihot esculenta) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) crop fields were the most visited, and these visits were more common during the rainy than the dry season. Distances from crop sites to the boundary of the protected area and to the river also influenced visit frequency. Camera-trapping was the least sensitive method while questionnaires and track observations presented consistent and complementary results to characterize spatial and temporal visits of bushpig into the crop fields. Evidence from our study shows that when used in combination, these methods can provide useful data to improve our understanding of the interactions between bushpigs and domestic pigs at the wildlife-domestic interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63055792019-01-07 Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda Payne, Ariane Ogweng, Peter Ojok, Alfred Etter, Eric Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle Masembe, Charles Ståhl, Karl Jori, Ferran Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Bushpigs (Potamochoerus larvatus) are considered a nuisance to farmers because of their crop raiding habits. Through their incursions into farmlands, they may interact with free-ranging domestic pigs and potentially cause transmission of infectious diseases such as African Swine Fever (ASF). The role of the bushpig in the epidemiology of ASF is poorly known and one of the gaps of knowledge is precisely the nature of interaction between bushpigs and domestic pigs. Thus, in this study, we investigated the frequency of bushpig visits to crop fields in rural communities where ASF is endemic, at the edge of a wildlife protected area in northwestern Uganda, to better understand the potential for interaction and disease transmission. We used three methods (questionnaires, camera traps, and observations for tracks) to assess bushpig visits to farmland. These methods were implemented concurrently in 28 farms during rainy and dry seasons. The results obtained by each of the three methods were analyzed by generalized linear mixed models. Potential risk factors including crop type, season, and landscape characteristics related to bushpig ecology were tested as explanatory variables. A generalized linear model and the Kendall test were used to compare the results and consistency of the frequency values obtained by the three methods. A high percentage (75%) of interviewed farmers reported visits from bushpigs in 29.6% of assessed crops (n = 145), and a frequency of 0.014 +/−0.05 visits per night was obtained through camera-trapping. Bushpig tracks were detected in 36% of sessions of observation. Cassava (Manihot esculenta) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) crop fields were the most visited, and these visits were more common during the rainy than the dry season. Distances from crop sites to the boundary of the protected area and to the river also influenced visit frequency. Camera-trapping was the least sensitive method while questionnaires and track observations presented consistent and complementary results to characterize spatial and temporal visits of bushpig into the crop fields. Evidence from our study shows that when used in combination, these methods can provide useful data to improve our understanding of the interactions between bushpigs and domestic pigs at the wildlife-domestic interface. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6305579/ /pubmed/30619893 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00295 Text en Copyright © 2018 Payne, Ogweng, Ojok, Etter, Gilot-Fromont, Masembe, Ståhl and Jori. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Payne, Ariane
Ogweng, Peter
Ojok, Alfred
Etter, Eric
Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle
Masembe, Charles
Ståhl, Karl
Jori, Ferran
Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda
title Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda
title_full Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda
title_short Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife—Livestock Interface in Uganda
title_sort comparison of three methods to assess the potential for bushpig-domestic pig interactions at the wildlife—livestock interface in uganda
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619893
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00295
work_keys_str_mv AT payneariane comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT ogwengpeter comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT ojokalfred comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT ettereric comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT gilotfromontemmanuelle comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT masembecharles comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT stahlkarl comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda
AT joriferran comparisonofthreemethodstoassessthepotentialforbushpigdomesticpiginteractionsatthewildlifelivestockinterfaceinuganda