Cargando…

Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine

Interest in precision medicine has grown in recent years due to the variable clinical benefit provided by some medications, their cost, and by new opportunities to tailor therapies to individual patients. In cystic fibrosis it may soon be possible to test several corrector drugs that improve the fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthes, Elizabeth, Goepp, Julie, Martini, Carolina, Shan, Jiajie, Liao, Jie, Thomas, David Y., Hanrahan, John W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01490
_version_ 1783382635623481344
author Matthes, Elizabeth
Goepp, Julie
Martini, Carolina
Shan, Jiajie
Liao, Jie
Thomas, David Y.
Hanrahan, John W.
author_facet Matthes, Elizabeth
Goepp, Julie
Martini, Carolina
Shan, Jiajie
Liao, Jie
Thomas, David Y.
Hanrahan, John W.
author_sort Matthes, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Interest in precision medicine has grown in recent years due to the variable clinical benefit provided by some medications, their cost, and by new opportunities to tailor therapies to individual patients. In cystic fibrosis it may soon be possible to test several corrector drugs that improve the folding and functional expression of mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) prospectively using cells from a patient to find the one that is best for that individual. Patient-to-patient variation in cell culture responses to correctors and the reproducibility of those responses has not been studied quantitatively. We measured the functional correction provided by lumacaftor (VX-809) using bronchial epithelial cells from 20 patients homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Significant differences were observed between individuals, supporting the utility of prospective testing. However, when correction of F508del-CFTR was measured repeatedly using cell aliquots from the same individuals, a design effect was observed that would impact statistical tests of significance. The results suggest that the sample size obtained from power calculations should be increased to compensate for group sampling when CFTR corrector drugs are compared in vitro for precision medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63057432019-01-07 Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine Matthes, Elizabeth Goepp, Julie Martini, Carolina Shan, Jiajie Liao, Jie Thomas, David Y. Hanrahan, John W. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Interest in precision medicine has grown in recent years due to the variable clinical benefit provided by some medications, their cost, and by new opportunities to tailor therapies to individual patients. In cystic fibrosis it may soon be possible to test several corrector drugs that improve the folding and functional expression of mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) prospectively using cells from a patient to find the one that is best for that individual. Patient-to-patient variation in cell culture responses to correctors and the reproducibility of those responses has not been studied quantitatively. We measured the functional correction provided by lumacaftor (VX-809) using bronchial epithelial cells from 20 patients homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Significant differences were observed between individuals, supporting the utility of prospective testing. However, when correction of F508del-CFTR was measured repeatedly using cell aliquots from the same individuals, a design effect was observed that would impact statistical tests of significance. The results suggest that the sample size obtained from power calculations should be increased to compensate for group sampling when CFTR corrector drugs are compared in vitro for precision medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6305743/ /pubmed/30618775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01490 Text en Copyright © 2018 Matthes, Goepp, Martini, Shan, Liao, Thomas and Hanrahan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Matthes, Elizabeth
Goepp, Julie
Martini, Carolina
Shan, Jiajie
Liao, Jie
Thomas, David Y.
Hanrahan, John W.
Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine
title Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine
title_full Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine
title_fullStr Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine
title_short Variable Responses to CFTR Correctors in vitro: Estimating the Design Effect in Precision Medicine
title_sort variable responses to cftr correctors in vitro: estimating the design effect in precision medicine
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01490
work_keys_str_mv AT mattheselizabeth variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine
AT goeppjulie variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine
AT martinicarolina variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine
AT shanjiajie variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine
AT liaojie variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine
AT thomasdavidy variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine
AT hanrahanjohnw variableresponsestocftrcorrectorsinvitroestimatingthedesigneffectinprecisionmedicine