Cargando…
Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry
This study was conducted to optimize the cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry using both clinical and quantitative image quality evaluation with measurement of the radiation dose. A natural bone human skull phantom and an image quality phantom were used to evaluate the im...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.141 |
_version_ | 1783382679527358464 |
---|---|
author | Alawaji, Yasmine MacDonald, David S. Giannelis, Georgios Ford, Nancy L. |
author_facet | Alawaji, Yasmine MacDonald, David S. Giannelis, Georgios Ford, Nancy L. |
author_sort | Alawaji, Yasmine |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was conducted to optimize the cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry using both clinical and quantitative image quality evaluation with measurement of the radiation dose. A natural bone human skull phantom and an image quality phantom were used to evaluate the images produced after changing the exposure parameters (kVp and mA). A 10 × 5 cm(2) field of view was selected for average adult. Five scans were taken with varying kVp (70–90 kVp) first at fixed 4 mA. After assessment of the scans and selecting the best kVp, nine scans were taken with 2–12 mA, and the kVp was fixed at the optimal value. A clinical assessment of the implant‐related anatomical landmarks was done in random order by two blinded examiners. Quantitative image quality was assessed for noise/uniformity, artifact added value, contrast‐to‐noise ratio, spatial resolution, and geometrical distortion. A dosimetry index phantom and thimble ion chamber were used to measure the absorbed dose for each scan setting. The anatomical landmarks of the maxilla had good image quality at all kVp settings. To produce good quality images, the mandibular landmarks demanded higher exposure parameters than the maxillary landmarks. The quantitative image quality values were acceptable at all selected exposure settings. Changing the exposure parameters does not necessarily produce higher image quality outcomes but does affect the radiation dose to the patient. The image quality could be optimized for implant treatment planning at lower exposure settings and dose than the default settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6305941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63059412019-01-02 Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry Alawaji, Yasmine MacDonald, David S. Giannelis, Georgios Ford, Nancy L. Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles This study was conducted to optimize the cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry using both clinical and quantitative image quality evaluation with measurement of the radiation dose. A natural bone human skull phantom and an image quality phantom were used to evaluate the images produced after changing the exposure parameters (kVp and mA). A 10 × 5 cm(2) field of view was selected for average adult. Five scans were taken with varying kVp (70–90 kVp) first at fixed 4 mA. After assessment of the scans and selecting the best kVp, nine scans were taken with 2–12 mA, and the kVp was fixed at the optimal value. A clinical assessment of the implant‐related anatomical landmarks was done in random order by two blinded examiners. Quantitative image quality was assessed for noise/uniformity, artifact added value, contrast‐to‐noise ratio, spatial resolution, and geometrical distortion. A dosimetry index phantom and thimble ion chamber were used to measure the absorbed dose for each scan setting. The anatomical landmarks of the maxilla had good image quality at all kVp settings. To produce good quality images, the mandibular landmarks demanded higher exposure parameters than the maxillary landmarks. The quantitative image quality values were acceptable at all selected exposure settings. Changing the exposure parameters does not necessarily produce higher image quality outcomes but does affect the radiation dose to the patient. The image quality could be optimized for implant treatment planning at lower exposure settings and dose than the default settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6305941/ /pubmed/30603109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.141 Text en ©2018 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Alawaji, Yasmine MacDonald, David S. Giannelis, Georgios Ford, Nancy L. Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
title | Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
title_full | Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
title_fullStr | Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
title_short | Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
title_sort | optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alawajiyasmine optimizationofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagequalityinimplantdentistry AT macdonalddavids optimizationofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagequalityinimplantdentistry AT giannelisgeorgios optimizationofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagequalityinimplantdentistry AT fordnancyl optimizationofconebeamcomputedtomographyimagequalityinimplantdentistry |