Cargando…

Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was the assessment of neuron‐specific enolase (NSE) and S‐100 concentration in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with different clinical forms of tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The serum and CFS concentrations of S100B and NSE o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Czupryna, Piotr, Grygorczuk, Sambor, Pancewicz, Sławomir, Świerzbińska, Renata, Zajkowska, Joanna, Krawczuk, Katarzyna, Dunaj, Justyna, Filipiuk, Justyna, Kruszewska, Ewelina, Borawski, Karol, Moniuszko‐Malinowska, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30468006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1160
_version_ 1783382679773773824
author Czupryna, Piotr
Grygorczuk, Sambor
Pancewicz, Sławomir
Świerzbińska, Renata
Zajkowska, Joanna
Krawczuk, Katarzyna
Dunaj, Justyna
Filipiuk, Justyna
Kruszewska, Ewelina
Borawski, Karol
Moniuszko‐Malinowska, Anna
author_facet Czupryna, Piotr
Grygorczuk, Sambor
Pancewicz, Sławomir
Świerzbińska, Renata
Zajkowska, Joanna
Krawczuk, Katarzyna
Dunaj, Justyna
Filipiuk, Justyna
Kruszewska, Ewelina
Borawski, Karol
Moniuszko‐Malinowska, Anna
author_sort Czupryna, Piotr
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was the assessment of neuron‐specific enolase (NSE) and S‐100 concentration in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with different clinical forms of tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The serum and CFS concentrations of S100B and NSE of 43 patients with TBE were measured with ELISA method using commercial kits: NSE and S100B Elisa Kit (DRG, Germany). Subjects were divided into: Group I—patients with meningoencephalitis (n = 17) and Group II—patients with meningitis (n = 26). None of the patients reported any neurodegenerative disorder that could affect the results of the study. The control group (CG) consisted of 13 patients. These patients were admitted to the hospital because of headache, and the CSF examination excluded inflammatory process. Samples were collected on admission (sample 1) and after treatment (sample 2). RESULTS: Neuron‐specific enolase concentration in CSF was higher in group I than in group II (p = 0.0002) and controls (p = 0.04). NSE concentration was higher in the second serum and CSF sample in both groups. S100B concentration did not differ between TBE patients and controls. NSE concentration in serum after 14 days was higher in the sequelae group (34.3 ± 9.7 vs. 16.7 ± 15, p = 0.04). Also, NSE serum sample 2/serum sample 1 ratio was significantly higher in the sequelae group (3.57 ± 0.92 vs. 1.53 ± 1.99, p = 0.04). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis indicated that NSE concentration in serum II differentiates sequelae group from other meningoencephalitis patients (p = 0.0001). S100B serum sample 2/CSF sample 2 ratio was lower in the sequelae group (0.05 ± 0.1 vs. 0.37 ± 0.28, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: (a) Neurodegeneration process is present in TBE encephalitis. (b) NSE concentration correlates with inflammatory parameters in CSF in TBE. (c) Neurodegeneration is present even after clinical recovery of TBE. (d) NSE could be used in the prediction of TBE course. (e) S‐100 did not differ between TBE patients and controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6305942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63059422019-01-02 Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis Czupryna, Piotr Grygorczuk, Sambor Pancewicz, Sławomir Świerzbińska, Renata Zajkowska, Joanna Krawczuk, Katarzyna Dunaj, Justyna Filipiuk, Justyna Kruszewska, Ewelina Borawski, Karol Moniuszko‐Malinowska, Anna Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was the assessment of neuron‐specific enolase (NSE) and S‐100 concentration in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with different clinical forms of tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The serum and CFS concentrations of S100B and NSE of 43 patients with TBE were measured with ELISA method using commercial kits: NSE and S100B Elisa Kit (DRG, Germany). Subjects were divided into: Group I—patients with meningoencephalitis (n = 17) and Group II—patients with meningitis (n = 26). None of the patients reported any neurodegenerative disorder that could affect the results of the study. The control group (CG) consisted of 13 patients. These patients were admitted to the hospital because of headache, and the CSF examination excluded inflammatory process. Samples were collected on admission (sample 1) and after treatment (sample 2). RESULTS: Neuron‐specific enolase concentration in CSF was higher in group I than in group II (p = 0.0002) and controls (p = 0.04). NSE concentration was higher in the second serum and CSF sample in both groups. S100B concentration did not differ between TBE patients and controls. NSE concentration in serum after 14 days was higher in the sequelae group (34.3 ± 9.7 vs. 16.7 ± 15, p = 0.04). Also, NSE serum sample 2/serum sample 1 ratio was significantly higher in the sequelae group (3.57 ± 0.92 vs. 1.53 ± 1.99, p = 0.04). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis indicated that NSE concentration in serum II differentiates sequelae group from other meningoencephalitis patients (p = 0.0001). S100B serum sample 2/CSF sample 2 ratio was lower in the sequelae group (0.05 ± 0.1 vs. 0.37 ± 0.28, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: (a) Neurodegeneration process is present in TBE encephalitis. (b) NSE concentration correlates with inflammatory parameters in CSF in TBE. (c) Neurodegeneration is present even after clinical recovery of TBE. (d) NSE could be used in the prediction of TBE course. (e) S‐100 did not differ between TBE patients and controls. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6305942/ /pubmed/30468006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1160 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Czupryna, Piotr
Grygorczuk, Sambor
Pancewicz, Sławomir
Świerzbińska, Renata
Zajkowska, Joanna
Krawczuk, Katarzyna
Dunaj, Justyna
Filipiuk, Justyna
Kruszewska, Ewelina
Borawski, Karol
Moniuszko‐Malinowska, Anna
Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
title Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
title_full Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
title_fullStr Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
title_short Evaluation of NSE and S100B in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
title_sort evaluation of nse and s100b in patients with tick‐borne encephalitis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30468006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1160
work_keys_str_mv AT czuprynapiotr evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT grygorczuksambor evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT pancewiczsławomir evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT swierzbinskarenata evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT zajkowskajoanna evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT krawczukkatarzyna evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT dunajjustyna evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT filipiukjustyna evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT kruszewskaewelina evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT borawskikarol evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis
AT moniuszkomalinowskaanna evaluationofnseands100binpatientswithtickborneencephalitis