Cargando…
Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis
Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627283 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr789 |
_version_ | 1783382716513779712 |
---|---|
author | Sachdev, Sarina Bardia, Nikky Nguyen, Landai Omar, Bassam |
author_facet | Sachdev, Sarina Bardia, Nikky Nguyen, Landai Omar, Bassam |
author_sort | Sachdev, Sarina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been considered a superior option to avoid anticoagulation, more recent analyses have demonstrated a significant incidence of previously unrecognized thrombosis associated with bioprosthetic valves, especially with the more recent advent of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement implantations. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a major cause of either acute or indolent bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and often has an elusive presentation causing delayed recognition and treatment. The literature has extensively addressed the risks and benefits of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT), without conclusive evidence-based recommendations. The duration of anticoagulation following an episode of BPVT is unclear, and lifelong anticoagulation has been suggested. The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in various risk groups has introduced new challenges with regards to valve thrombosis, which have been poorly studied with regards to optimal treatment and prevention. The increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures is expected to bring on further uncharted challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6306127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63061272019-01-09 Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Sachdev, Sarina Bardia, Nikky Nguyen, Landai Omar, Bassam Cardiol Res Review Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been considered a superior option to avoid anticoagulation, more recent analyses have demonstrated a significant incidence of previously unrecognized thrombosis associated with bioprosthetic valves, especially with the more recent advent of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement implantations. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a major cause of either acute or indolent bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and often has an elusive presentation causing delayed recognition and treatment. The literature has extensively addressed the risks and benefits of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT), without conclusive evidence-based recommendations. The duration of anticoagulation following an episode of BPVT is unclear, and lifelong anticoagulation has been suggested. The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in various risk groups has introduced new challenges with regards to valve thrombosis, which have been poorly studied with regards to optimal treatment and prevention. The increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures is expected to bring on further uncharted challenges. Elmer Press 2018-12 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6306127/ /pubmed/30627283 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr789 Text en Copyright 2018, Sachdev et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Sachdev, Sarina Bardia, Nikky Nguyen, Landai Omar, Bassam Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis |
title | Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis |
title_full | Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis |
title_fullStr | Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis |
title_short | Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis |
title_sort | bioprosthetic valve thrombosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627283 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sachdevsarina bioprostheticvalvethrombosis AT bardianikky bioprostheticvalvethrombosis AT nguyenlandai bioprostheticvalvethrombosis AT omarbassam bioprostheticvalvethrombosis |