Cargando…

Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora

Benthic foraminifera, and certainly symbiont-bearing (large) benthic foraminifera are generally considered to have large geographic ranges in combination with significant ecomorphological variation. With the advance of molecular phylogenetic approaches, supported or preceded by detailed morphologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Renema, Willem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208158
_version_ 1783382720939819008
author Renema, Willem
author_facet Renema, Willem
author_sort Renema, Willem
collection PubMed
description Benthic foraminifera, and certainly symbiont-bearing (large) benthic foraminifera are generally considered to have large geographic ranges in combination with significant ecomorphological variation. With the advance of molecular phylogenetic approaches, supported or preceded by detailed morphological studies, it was demonstrated that this view needs to be reevaluated. In this paper I evaluate the morphology of five Marginopora populations from around the Coral Sea by microCT-scanning. I argue that ecomorphological and ontogenetic variation is smaller than geographic variation in morphology. This forms the basis for the description of three new species, M. santoensis nov. spec., M. charlottensis nov. spec., M. orpheusensis nov. spec. Quantitative morphological variation between M. rossi, M. orpheusensis nov. spec. and M. charlottensis nov. spec. is overlapping, but each species has unique morphological characters supporting recognition as new species. Support to distinguish the deep living (M. rossi, M. charlottensis nov. spec., M. orpheusensis nov. spec.) and shallow living (M. vertebralis) Marginopora populations as separate species is strong, but not enough molecular phylogenetic data are available to test the three new deep-living species on the Great Barrier Reef hypothesis. However, detailed understanding of ecophenotypic variation in M. santoensis nov. spec. supports the conclusion that it is unlikely that ecophenotypic variation can explain the morphological variation between the three species. I argue that the number of species in this genus is underestimated, and that there are at least five species in the Coral Sea area alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6306156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63061562019-01-08 Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora Renema, Willem PLoS One Research Article Benthic foraminifera, and certainly symbiont-bearing (large) benthic foraminifera are generally considered to have large geographic ranges in combination with significant ecomorphological variation. With the advance of molecular phylogenetic approaches, supported or preceded by detailed morphological studies, it was demonstrated that this view needs to be reevaluated. In this paper I evaluate the morphology of five Marginopora populations from around the Coral Sea by microCT-scanning. I argue that ecomorphological and ontogenetic variation is smaller than geographic variation in morphology. This forms the basis for the description of three new species, M. santoensis nov. spec., M. charlottensis nov. spec., M. orpheusensis nov. spec. Quantitative morphological variation between M. rossi, M. orpheusensis nov. spec. and M. charlottensis nov. spec. is overlapping, but each species has unique morphological characters supporting recognition as new species. Support to distinguish the deep living (M. rossi, M. charlottensis nov. spec., M. orpheusensis nov. spec.) and shallow living (M. vertebralis) Marginopora populations as separate species is strong, but not enough molecular phylogenetic data are available to test the three new deep-living species on the Great Barrier Reef hypothesis. However, detailed understanding of ecophenotypic variation in M. santoensis nov. spec. supports the conclusion that it is unlikely that ecophenotypic variation can explain the morphological variation between the three species. I argue that the number of species in this genus is underestimated, and that there are at least five species in the Coral Sea area alone. Public Library of Science 2018-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6306156/ /pubmed/30586401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208158 Text en © 2018 Willem Renema http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Renema, Willem
Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora
title Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora
title_full Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora
title_fullStr Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora
title_full_unstemmed Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora
title_short Morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus Marginopora
title_sort morphological diversity in the foraminiferal genus marginopora
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208158
work_keys_str_mv AT renemawillem morphologicaldiversityintheforaminiferalgenusmarginopora