Cargando…

Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape

Deep convolutional networks (DCNNs) are achieving previously unseen performance in object classification, raising questions about whether DCNNs operate similarly to human vision. In biological vision, shape is arguably the most important cue for recognition. We tested the role of shape information i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Nicholas, Lu, Hongjing, Erlikhman, Gennady, Kellman, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613
_version_ 1783382740217888768
author Baker, Nicholas
Lu, Hongjing
Erlikhman, Gennady
Kellman, Philip J.
author_facet Baker, Nicholas
Lu, Hongjing
Erlikhman, Gennady
Kellman, Philip J.
author_sort Baker, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description Deep convolutional networks (DCNNs) are achieving previously unseen performance in object classification, raising questions about whether DCNNs operate similarly to human vision. In biological vision, shape is arguably the most important cue for recognition. We tested the role of shape information in DCNNs trained to recognize objects. In Experiment 1, we presented a trained DCNN with object silhouettes that preserved overall shape but were filled with surface texture taken from other objects. Shape cues appeared to play some role in the classification of artifacts, but little or none for animals. In Experiments 2–4, DCNNs showed no ability to classify glass figurines or outlines but correctly classified some silhouettes. Aspects of these results led us to hypothesize that DCNNs do not distinguish object’s bounding contours from other edges, and that DCNNs access some local shape features, but not global shape. In Experiment 5, we tested this hypothesis with displays that preserved local features but disrupted global shape, and vice versa. With disrupted global shape, which reduced human accuracy to 28%, DCNNs gave the same classification labels as with ordinary shapes. Conversely, local contour changes eliminated accurate DCNN classification but caused no difficulty for human observers. These results provide evidence that DCNNs have access to some local shape information in the form of local edge relations, but they have no access to global object shapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6306249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63062492019-01-08 Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape Baker, Nicholas Lu, Hongjing Erlikhman, Gennady Kellman, Philip J. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Deep convolutional networks (DCNNs) are achieving previously unseen performance in object classification, raising questions about whether DCNNs operate similarly to human vision. In biological vision, shape is arguably the most important cue for recognition. We tested the role of shape information in DCNNs trained to recognize objects. In Experiment 1, we presented a trained DCNN with object silhouettes that preserved overall shape but were filled with surface texture taken from other objects. Shape cues appeared to play some role in the classification of artifacts, but little or none for animals. In Experiments 2–4, DCNNs showed no ability to classify glass figurines or outlines but correctly classified some silhouettes. Aspects of these results led us to hypothesize that DCNNs do not distinguish object’s bounding contours from other edges, and that DCNNs access some local shape features, but not global shape. In Experiment 5, we tested this hypothesis with displays that preserved local features but disrupted global shape, and vice versa. With disrupted global shape, which reduced human accuracy to 28%, DCNNs gave the same classification labels as with ordinary shapes. Conversely, local contour changes eliminated accurate DCNN classification but caused no difficulty for human observers. These results provide evidence that DCNNs have access to some local shape information in the form of local edge relations, but they have no access to global object shapes. Public Library of Science 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6306249/ /pubmed/30532273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613 Text en © 2018 Baker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baker, Nicholas
Lu, Hongjing
Erlikhman, Gennady
Kellman, Philip J.
Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
title Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
title_full Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
title_fullStr Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
title_full_unstemmed Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
title_short Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
title_sort deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613
work_keys_str_mv AT bakernicholas deepconvolutionalnetworksdonotclassifybasedonglobalobjectshape
AT luhongjing deepconvolutionalnetworksdonotclassifybasedonglobalobjectshape
AT erlikhmangennady deepconvolutionalnetworksdonotclassifybasedonglobalobjectshape
AT kellmanphilipj deepconvolutionalnetworksdonotclassifybasedonglobalobjectshape