Cargando…

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy—Insights from an Indian study

OBJECTIVES: To study if four cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) could offer protection against contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and post procedural renal dysfunction in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This was a prospective single blin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valappil, Sanjai Pattu, Kunjukrishnapillai, Sivaprasad, Viswanathan, Sunitha, Koshy, Alummoottil George, Gupta, Prabha Nini, Velayudhan, Radhakrishnan Vallikkattu, Iype, Mathew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.11.012
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To study if four cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) could offer protection against contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and post procedural renal dysfunction in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This was a prospective single blind randomized sham controlled trial where patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stage III chronic kidney disease were randomized into sham preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning. The primary outcome was the reduction in the incidence of CIN. The secondary outcomes were the maximum improvement in eGFR, maximum reduction in serum creatinine and composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure up to 6 weeks after PCI. RESULTS: Eleven out of fifty patients in the study group developed CIN (22%) compared to eighteen out of the fifty control patients (36%) (p = 0.123). There was a statistically significant improvement in the post procedure creatinine values at 24 h (p = 0.013), 48 h (p = 0.015), 2 weeks (p = 0.003), 6 weeks (p = 0.003) and post procedure glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values at 24 h (p = 0.026), 48 h (p = 0.044), 2 weeks (p = 0.015) and 6 weeks (p = 0.011) in study group compared to control group. The secondary outcome composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure was not statistically significant (p: 0.646). CONCLUSION: RIPC does not result in significant reduction of CIN. However RIPC helps in the prevention of post procedural worsening in eGFR and serum creatinine even up to 6 weeks.