Cargando…
Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undert...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120492 |
_version_ | 1783382889455419392 |
---|---|
author | Reinedahl, David Chrcanovic, Bruno Albrektsson, Tomas Tengvall, Pentti Wennerberg, Ann |
author_facet | Reinedahl, David Chrcanovic, Bruno Albrektsson, Tomas Tengvall, Pentti Wennerberg, Ann |
author_sort | Reinedahl, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undertaken. A total of 133 studies were analyzed. Most studies induced peri-implantitis with ligatures that had formed a biofilm, sometimes in combination with inoculation of specific bacteria but never in a sterile environment. Most vertical MBR resulted from new ligatures periodically packed above old ones, followed by periodically exchanged ligatures and ligatures that were not exchanged. Cotton ligatures produced the most MBR, followed by steel, “dental floss” (not further specified in the studies) and silk. The amount of MBR varied significantly between different animal types and implant surfaces. None of the analyzed ligature studies aimed to validate that bacteria are necessary for the inducement of MBR. It cannot be excluded that bone loss can be achieved by other factors of the model, such as an immunological reaction to the ligature itself or trauma from repeated ligature insertions. Because all the included trials allowed plaque accumulation on the ligatures, bone resorbing capacity due to other factors could not be excluded or evaluated here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6306937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63069372019-01-02 Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review Reinedahl, David Chrcanovic, Bruno Albrektsson, Tomas Tengvall, Pentti Wennerberg, Ann J Clin Med Review This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undertaken. A total of 133 studies were analyzed. Most studies induced peri-implantitis with ligatures that had formed a biofilm, sometimes in combination with inoculation of specific bacteria but never in a sterile environment. Most vertical MBR resulted from new ligatures periodically packed above old ones, followed by periodically exchanged ligatures and ligatures that were not exchanged. Cotton ligatures produced the most MBR, followed by steel, “dental floss” (not further specified in the studies) and silk. The amount of MBR varied significantly between different animal types and implant surfaces. None of the analyzed ligature studies aimed to validate that bacteria are necessary for the inducement of MBR. It cannot be excluded that bone loss can be achieved by other factors of the model, such as an immunological reaction to the ligature itself or trauma from repeated ligature insertions. Because all the included trials allowed plaque accumulation on the ligatures, bone resorbing capacity due to other factors could not be excluded or evaluated here. MDPI 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6306937/ /pubmed/30486492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120492 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Reinedahl, David Chrcanovic, Bruno Albrektsson, Tomas Tengvall, Pentti Wennerberg, Ann Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review |
title | Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review |
title_full | Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review |
title_short | Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | ligature-induced experimental peri-implantitis—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reinedahldavid ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview AT chrcanovicbruno ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview AT albrektssontomas ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview AT tengvallpentti ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview AT wennerbergann ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview |