Cargando…

Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review

This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinedahl, David, Chrcanovic, Bruno, Albrektsson, Tomas, Tengvall, Pentti, Wennerberg, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120492
_version_ 1783382889455419392
author Reinedahl, David
Chrcanovic, Bruno
Albrektsson, Tomas
Tengvall, Pentti
Wennerberg, Ann
author_facet Reinedahl, David
Chrcanovic, Bruno
Albrektsson, Tomas
Tengvall, Pentti
Wennerberg, Ann
author_sort Reinedahl, David
collection PubMed
description This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undertaken. A total of 133 studies were analyzed. Most studies induced peri-implantitis with ligatures that had formed a biofilm, sometimes in combination with inoculation of specific bacteria but never in a sterile environment. Most vertical MBR resulted from new ligatures periodically packed above old ones, followed by periodically exchanged ligatures and ligatures that were not exchanged. Cotton ligatures produced the most MBR, followed by steel, “dental floss” (not further specified in the studies) and silk. The amount of MBR varied significantly between different animal types and implant surfaces. None of the analyzed ligature studies aimed to validate that bacteria are necessary for the inducement of MBR. It cannot be excluded that bone loss can be achieved by other factors of the model, such as an immunological reaction to the ligature itself or trauma from repeated ligature insertions. Because all the included trials allowed plaque accumulation on the ligatures, bone resorbing capacity due to other factors could not be excluded or evaluated here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6306937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63069372019-01-02 Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review Reinedahl, David Chrcanovic, Bruno Albrektsson, Tomas Tengvall, Pentti Wennerberg, Ann J Clin Med Review This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undertaken. A total of 133 studies were analyzed. Most studies induced peri-implantitis with ligatures that had formed a biofilm, sometimes in combination with inoculation of specific bacteria but never in a sterile environment. Most vertical MBR resulted from new ligatures periodically packed above old ones, followed by periodically exchanged ligatures and ligatures that were not exchanged. Cotton ligatures produced the most MBR, followed by steel, “dental floss” (not further specified in the studies) and silk. The amount of MBR varied significantly between different animal types and implant surfaces. None of the analyzed ligature studies aimed to validate that bacteria are necessary for the inducement of MBR. It cannot be excluded that bone loss can be achieved by other factors of the model, such as an immunological reaction to the ligature itself or trauma from repeated ligature insertions. Because all the included trials allowed plaque accumulation on the ligatures, bone resorbing capacity due to other factors could not be excluded or evaluated here. MDPI 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6306937/ /pubmed/30486492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120492 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Reinedahl, David
Chrcanovic, Bruno
Albrektsson, Tomas
Tengvall, Pentti
Wennerberg, Ann
Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
title Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
title_full Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
title_short Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review
title_sort ligature-induced experimental peri-implantitis—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120492
work_keys_str_mv AT reinedahldavid ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT chrcanovicbruno ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT albrektssontomas ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT tengvallpentti ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview
AT wennerbergann ligatureinducedexperimentalperiimplantitisasystematicreview