Cargando…

Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide a systematic compilation of existing measures of self-efficacy developed specifically for use in cancer patients and provide descriptions and comparative evaluations of the characteristics, psychometric properties and performance parameters. METHOD: A systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Fei-Fei, Yang, Qing, Wang, An-ni, Zhang, Jing-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9
_version_ 1783382938129268736
author Huang, Fei-Fei
Yang, Qing
Wang, An-ni
Zhang, Jing-Ping
author_facet Huang, Fei-Fei
Yang, Qing
Wang, An-ni
Zhang, Jing-Ping
author_sort Huang, Fei-Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide a systematic compilation of existing measures of self-efficacy developed specifically for use in cancer patients and provide descriptions and comparative evaluations of the characteristics, psychometric properties and performance parameters. METHOD: A systematic electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid (PsyINFO), EBSCO, Elsevier, Scopus to identify self-efficacy assessment tools for cancer patients, between January 1977 to February 2018. The characteristics of target population, instrument, development process and psychometric properties were summarized. All included instruments were subsequently appraised using a psychometric quality assessment tool based on previous publications. Validity of the quality assessment was reviewed and confirmed by five experts. RESULTS: Fifteen cancer-related self-efficacy instruments were identified. Among them, (40.0%) 6/15 were task-specific, focusing on cancer-related health issues such as fatigue, communication, rehabilitation, exercise, and narcotic pain killer usage. Six instruments were disease-specific for breast cancer, lung cancer, or advanced cancer. Weaknesses of the development processes included the singularity of instrument construction methods, and non-transparent selection of the final items. The main limitation seen in the validation processes was that some important properties of instruments (e.g. test-retest reliability, criterion validity, responsiveness, interpretability, feasibility, and acceptability) were not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes the limitations and strengths of current self-efficacy instruments for cancer patient. The information reported here can assist clinicians and researchers in the selection of the appropriate instrument. Finally, it points out the need for reporting validation statistics to facilitate the use of these instruments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63071412019-01-02 Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review Huang, Fei-Fei Yang, Qing Wang, An-ni Zhang, Jing-Ping Health Qual Life Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide a systematic compilation of existing measures of self-efficacy developed specifically for use in cancer patients and provide descriptions and comparative evaluations of the characteristics, psychometric properties and performance parameters. METHOD: A systematic electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid (PsyINFO), EBSCO, Elsevier, Scopus to identify self-efficacy assessment tools for cancer patients, between January 1977 to February 2018. The characteristics of target population, instrument, development process and psychometric properties were summarized. All included instruments were subsequently appraised using a psychometric quality assessment tool based on previous publications. Validity of the quality assessment was reviewed and confirmed by five experts. RESULTS: Fifteen cancer-related self-efficacy instruments were identified. Among them, (40.0%) 6/15 were task-specific, focusing on cancer-related health issues such as fatigue, communication, rehabilitation, exercise, and narcotic pain killer usage. Six instruments were disease-specific for breast cancer, lung cancer, or advanced cancer. Weaknesses of the development processes included the singularity of instrument construction methods, and non-transparent selection of the final items. The main limitation seen in the validation processes was that some important properties of instruments (e.g. test-retest reliability, criterion validity, responsiveness, interpretability, feasibility, and acceptability) were not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes the limitations and strengths of current self-efficacy instruments for cancer patient. The information reported here can assist clinicians and researchers in the selection of the appropriate instrument. Finally, it points out the need for reporting validation statistics to facilitate the use of these instruments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307141/ /pubmed/30591047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Huang, Fei-Fei
Yang, Qing
Wang, An-ni
Zhang, Jing-Ping
Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
title Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
title_full Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
title_fullStr Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
title_short Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
title_sort psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9
work_keys_str_mv AT huangfeifei psychometricpropertiesandperformanceofexistingselfefficacyinstrumentsincancerpopulationsasystematicreview
AT yangqing psychometricpropertiesandperformanceofexistingselfefficacyinstrumentsincancerpopulationsasystematicreview
AT wanganni psychometricpropertiesandperformanceofexistingselfefficacyinstrumentsincancerpopulationsasystematicreview
AT zhangjingping psychometricpropertiesandperformanceofexistingselfefficacyinstrumentsincancerpopulationsasystematicreview