Cargando…

Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-fraction set-up error and intra-fraction motion during reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) breast radiotherapy, and to determine a planning target volume (PTV) margin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jie, Liu, Shih-Hua, Lin, Jhen-Bin, Wu, Meng-Hao, Wu, Chieh-Ju, Tai, Hung-Chi, Hsu, Shih-Ming, Chen, Yin-Ju, Tai, Jo-Chiao, Chen, Yu-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1200-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-fraction set-up error and intra-fraction motion during reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) breast radiotherapy, and to determine a planning target volume (PTV) margin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were prospectively acquired at fractions 1, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 14 for 30 patients who underwent RSD breast radiotherapy. Online correction for initial set-up error greater than 5 mm or 2° was performed and post-correction CBCT was acquired. An off-line analysis was performed to quantify initial and residual inter-fraction set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in three-dimensions. Patient inter-fraction errors were analysed for time trends during the course of radiotherapy. PTV margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. RESULTS: The initial inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.8–3.3 mm (translation) and 0.5° (rotation); random errors were 1.8–2.1 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.5° (rotation). After online correction, the residual inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.2–1.8 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.4° (rotation); random errors were 1.4–1.6 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.4° (rotation). Intra-fraction population systematic and random errors were ≤ 1.3 mm (translation) and ≤ 0.2° (rotation). The magnitude of inter-fraction set-up errors in the anterior-posterior direction, roll, and yaw were significantly correlated with higher body weight and body mass index (BMI). The inter-fraction set-up error did not change significantly as a function of time during the course of radiotherapy. The magnitude of intra-fraction motion was not correlated with patient characteristics and treatment time. The total PTV margins accounting for pre-correction and intra-fraction errors were 6.5–10.2 mm; those accounting for post-correction and intra-fraction errors were 4.7–6.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT is an effective modality to evaluate and improve the inter-fraction set-up reproducibility in RSD breast radiotherapy, particularly for patients with higher BMI. Intra-fraction motion was minimal during RSD breast radiotherapy.