Cargando…

Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-fraction set-up error and intra-fraction motion during reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) breast radiotherapy, and to determine a planning target volume (PTV) margin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jie, Liu, Shih-Hua, Lin, Jhen-Bin, Wu, Meng-Hao, Wu, Chieh-Ju, Tai, Hung-Chi, Hsu, Shih-Ming, Chen, Yin-Ju, Tai, Jo-Chiao, Chen, Yu-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1200-1
_version_ 1783382950307430400
author Lee, Jie
Liu, Shih-Hua
Lin, Jhen-Bin
Wu, Meng-Hao
Wu, Chieh-Ju
Tai, Hung-Chi
Hsu, Shih-Ming
Chen, Yin-Ju
Tai, Jo-Chiao
Chen, Yu-Jen
author_facet Lee, Jie
Liu, Shih-Hua
Lin, Jhen-Bin
Wu, Meng-Hao
Wu, Chieh-Ju
Tai, Hung-Chi
Hsu, Shih-Ming
Chen, Yin-Ju
Tai, Jo-Chiao
Chen, Yu-Jen
author_sort Lee, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-fraction set-up error and intra-fraction motion during reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) breast radiotherapy, and to determine a planning target volume (PTV) margin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were prospectively acquired at fractions 1, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 14 for 30 patients who underwent RSD breast radiotherapy. Online correction for initial set-up error greater than 5 mm or 2° was performed and post-correction CBCT was acquired. An off-line analysis was performed to quantify initial and residual inter-fraction set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in three-dimensions. Patient inter-fraction errors were analysed for time trends during the course of radiotherapy. PTV margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. RESULTS: The initial inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.8–3.3 mm (translation) and 0.5° (rotation); random errors were 1.8–2.1 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.5° (rotation). After online correction, the residual inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.2–1.8 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.4° (rotation); random errors were 1.4–1.6 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.4° (rotation). Intra-fraction population systematic and random errors were ≤ 1.3 mm (translation) and ≤ 0.2° (rotation). The magnitude of inter-fraction set-up errors in the anterior-posterior direction, roll, and yaw were significantly correlated with higher body weight and body mass index (BMI). The inter-fraction set-up error did not change significantly as a function of time during the course of radiotherapy. The magnitude of intra-fraction motion was not correlated with patient characteristics and treatment time. The total PTV margins accounting for pre-correction and intra-fraction errors were 6.5–10.2 mm; those accounting for post-correction and intra-fraction errors were 4.7–6.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT is an effective modality to evaluate and improve the inter-fraction set-up reproducibility in RSD breast radiotherapy, particularly for patients with higher BMI. Intra-fraction motion was minimal during RSD breast radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63071932019-01-02 Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy Lee, Jie Liu, Shih-Hua Lin, Jhen-Bin Wu, Meng-Hao Wu, Chieh-Ju Tai, Hung-Chi Hsu, Shih-Ming Chen, Yin-Ju Tai, Jo-Chiao Chen, Yu-Jen Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-fraction set-up error and intra-fraction motion during reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) breast radiotherapy, and to determine a planning target volume (PTV) margin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were prospectively acquired at fractions 1, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 14 for 30 patients who underwent RSD breast radiotherapy. Online correction for initial set-up error greater than 5 mm or 2° was performed and post-correction CBCT was acquired. An off-line analysis was performed to quantify initial and residual inter-fraction set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in three-dimensions. Patient inter-fraction errors were analysed for time trends during the course of radiotherapy. PTV margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. RESULTS: The initial inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.8–3.3 mm (translation) and 0.5° (rotation); random errors were 1.8–2.1 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.5° (rotation). After online correction, the residual inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.2–1.8 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.4° (rotation); random errors were 1.4–1.6 mm (translation) and 0.3–0.4° (rotation). Intra-fraction population systematic and random errors were ≤ 1.3 mm (translation) and ≤ 0.2° (rotation). The magnitude of inter-fraction set-up errors in the anterior-posterior direction, roll, and yaw were significantly correlated with higher body weight and body mass index (BMI). The inter-fraction set-up error did not change significantly as a function of time during the course of radiotherapy. The magnitude of intra-fraction motion was not correlated with patient characteristics and treatment time. The total PTV margins accounting for pre-correction and intra-fraction errors were 6.5–10.2 mm; those accounting for post-correction and intra-fraction errors were 4.7–6.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT is an effective modality to evaluate and improve the inter-fraction set-up reproducibility in RSD breast radiotherapy, particularly for patients with higher BMI. Intra-fraction motion was minimal during RSD breast radiotherapy. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307193/ /pubmed/30587208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1200-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Jie
Liu, Shih-Hua
Lin, Jhen-Bin
Wu, Meng-Hao
Wu, Chieh-Ju
Tai, Hung-Chi
Hsu, Shih-Ming
Chen, Yin-Ju
Tai, Jo-Chiao
Chen, Yu-Jen
Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
title Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
title_full Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
title_fullStr Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
title_short Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
title_sort image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1200-1
work_keys_str_mv AT leejie imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT liushihhua imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT linjhenbin imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT wumenghao imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT wuchiehju imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT taihungchi imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT hsushihming imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT chenyinju imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT taijochiao imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy
AT chenyujen imageguidedstudyofinterfractionandintrafractionsetupvariabilityandmarginsinreversesemidecubitusbreastradiotherapy