Cargando…
Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
BACKGROUND: To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR bef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8 |
_version_ | 1783382963171360768 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jingjing Si, Youjiao Zhao, Kaikai Shi, Xianglong Bi, Weiqun Liu, Shi-en Hua, Hui |
author_facet | Chen, Jingjing Si, Youjiao Zhao, Kaikai Shi, Xianglong Bi, Weiqun Liu, Shi-en Hua, Hui |
author_sort | Chen, Jingjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e(0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2–6.707)], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946. CONCLUSION: Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6307244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63072442019-01-02 Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses Chen, Jingjing Si, Youjiao Zhao, Kaikai Shi, Xianglong Bi, Weiqun Liu, Shi-en Hua, Hui BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e(0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2–6.707)], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946. CONCLUSION: Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307244/ /pubmed/30587152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Jingjing Si, Youjiao Zhao, Kaikai Shi, Xianglong Bi, Weiqun Liu, Shi-en Hua, Hui Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
title | Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
title_full | Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
title_short | Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
title_sort | evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjingjing evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses AT siyoujiao evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses AT zhaokaikai evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses AT shixianglong evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses AT biweiqun evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses AT liushien evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses AT huahui evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses |