Cargando…

Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses

BACKGROUND: To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR bef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jingjing, Si, Youjiao, Zhao, Kaikai, Shi, Xianglong, Bi, Weiqun, Liu, Shi-en, Hua, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8
_version_ 1783382963171360768
author Chen, Jingjing
Si, Youjiao
Zhao, Kaikai
Shi, Xianglong
Bi, Weiqun
Liu, Shi-en
Hua, Hui
author_facet Chen, Jingjing
Si, Youjiao
Zhao, Kaikai
Shi, Xianglong
Bi, Weiqun
Liu, Shi-en
Hua, Hui
author_sort Chen, Jingjing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e(0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2–6.707)], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946. CONCLUSION: Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63072442019-01-02 Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses Chen, Jingjing Si, Youjiao Zhao, Kaikai Shi, Xianglong Bi, Weiqun Liu, Shi-en Hua, Hui BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To explore the value of parameters of multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MDCE-MRI) in the qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses. METHODS: Eighty patients with hepatic masses were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent MDCE-MRI at 3.0 T MR before treatment. Mean enhancement time (MET), positive enhancement integral (PEI), a maximum slope of increase (MSI), and a maximum slope of decrease (MSD) were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic masses with respect to MET, PEI, and MSI values. The PEI and MSI values between hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic tumors had significant differences. The MSD value between metastatic tumors, HCCs, and hemangiomas were significantly different. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operator characteristic curves for MET, PEI, and MSI were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The specificity of MET, PEI, and MSI were all 77%, and the sensitivities of MSI was the highest, of which was 82.40%. Logistic regression analysis showed the regression equation to be P = 1/[1 + e(0.008 × 1 + 0.007 × 2–6.707)], and taking the Youden index maximum points as a diagnostic point was 0.2946. CONCLUSION: Some parameters of MDCE-MRI have significant roles in differentiating hepatic masses. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307244/ /pubmed/30587152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Jingjing
Si, Youjiao
Zhao, Kaikai
Shi, Xianglong
Bi, Weiqun
Liu, Shi-en
Hua, Hui
Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_full Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_fullStr Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_short Evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
title_sort evaluation of quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in qualitative diagnosis of hepatic masses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0299-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjingjing evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT siyoujiao evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT zhaokaikai evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT shixianglong evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT biweiqun evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT liushien evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses
AT huahui evaluationofquantitativeparametersofdynamiccontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimaginginqualitativediagnosisofhepaticmasses