Cargando…

An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data

BACKGROUND: This was an updated network meta-analysis (NMA) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Unlike previous NMA that used meta-regression to account for potential confounding by systematic variation in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muston, Dominic, Korobelnik, Jean-Francois, Reason, Tim, Hawkins, Neil, Chatzitheofilou, Ismini, Ryan, Fay, Kaiser, Peter K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-1006-9
_version_ 1783382963865518080
author Muston, Dominic
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Reason, Tim
Hawkins, Neil
Chatzitheofilou, Ismini
Ryan, Fay
Kaiser, Peter K.
author_facet Muston, Dominic
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Reason, Tim
Hawkins, Neil
Chatzitheofilou, Ismini
Ryan, Fay
Kaiser, Peter K.
author_sort Muston, Dominic
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This was an updated network meta-analysis (NMA) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Unlike previous NMA that used meta-regression to account for potential confounding by systematic variation in treatment effect modifiers across studies, this update incorporated individual patient-level data (IPD) regression to provide more robust adjustment. METHODS: An updated review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials for inclusion in a Bayesian NMA. The network included intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) 2 mg bimonthly (2q8) after 5 initial doses, ranibizumab 0.5 mg as-needed (PRN), ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend (T&E), and laser photocoagulation. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, and patients with ≥10 and ≥ 15 ETDRS letter gains/losses at 12 months. Analyses were performed using networks restricted to IPD-only and IPD and aggregate data with (i) no covariable adjustment, (ii) covariable adjustment for baseline BVCA assuming common interaction effects (against reference treatment), and (iii) covariable adjustments specific to each treatment comparison (restricted to IPD-only network). RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included in the analysis. IVT-AFL 2q8 was superior to laser in all analyses. IVT-AFL 2q8 showed strong evidence of superiority (95% credible interval [CrI] did not cross null) versus ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN for mean change in BCVA (mean difference 5.20, 95% CrI 1.90–8.52 ETDRS letters), ≥15 ETDRS letter gain (odds ratio [OR] 2.30, 95% CrI 1.12–4.20), and ≥10 ETDRS letter loss (OR 0.25, 95% CrI 0.05–0.74) (IPD and aggregate random-effects model with baseline BCVA adjustment). IVT-AFL 2q8 was not superior to ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E for mean change in BCVA (mean difference 5.15, 95% CrI -0.26–10.61 ETDRS letters) (IPD and aggregate random-effects model). CONCLUSIONS: This NMA, which incorporated IPD to improve analytic robustness, showed evidence of superiority of IVT-AFL 2q8 to laser and ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN. These results were irrespective of adjustment for baseline BCVA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-1006-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63072472019-01-02 An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data Muston, Dominic Korobelnik, Jean-Francois Reason, Tim Hawkins, Neil Chatzitheofilou, Ismini Ryan, Fay Kaiser, Peter K. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: This was an updated network meta-analysis (NMA) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Unlike previous NMA that used meta-regression to account for potential confounding by systematic variation in treatment effect modifiers across studies, this update incorporated individual patient-level data (IPD) regression to provide more robust adjustment. METHODS: An updated review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials for inclusion in a Bayesian NMA. The network included intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) 2 mg bimonthly (2q8) after 5 initial doses, ranibizumab 0.5 mg as-needed (PRN), ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend (T&E), and laser photocoagulation. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, and patients with ≥10 and ≥ 15 ETDRS letter gains/losses at 12 months. Analyses were performed using networks restricted to IPD-only and IPD and aggregate data with (i) no covariable adjustment, (ii) covariable adjustment for baseline BVCA assuming common interaction effects (against reference treatment), and (iii) covariable adjustments specific to each treatment comparison (restricted to IPD-only network). RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included in the analysis. IVT-AFL 2q8 was superior to laser in all analyses. IVT-AFL 2q8 showed strong evidence of superiority (95% credible interval [CrI] did not cross null) versus ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN for mean change in BCVA (mean difference 5.20, 95% CrI 1.90–8.52 ETDRS letters), ≥15 ETDRS letter gain (odds ratio [OR] 2.30, 95% CrI 1.12–4.20), and ≥10 ETDRS letter loss (OR 0.25, 95% CrI 0.05–0.74) (IPD and aggregate random-effects model with baseline BCVA adjustment). IVT-AFL 2q8 was not superior to ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E for mean change in BCVA (mean difference 5.15, 95% CrI -0.26–10.61 ETDRS letters) (IPD and aggregate random-effects model). CONCLUSIONS: This NMA, which incorporated IPD to improve analytic robustness, showed evidence of superiority of IVT-AFL 2q8 to laser and ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN. These results were irrespective of adjustment for baseline BCVA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-1006-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307247/ /pubmed/30591022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-1006-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muston, Dominic
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Reason, Tim
Hawkins, Neil
Chatzitheofilou, Ismini
Ryan, Fay
Kaiser, Peter K.
An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
title An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
title_full An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
title_fullStr An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
title_full_unstemmed An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
title_short An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
title_sort efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-1006-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mustondominic anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT korobelnikjeanfrancois anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT reasontim anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT hawkinsneil anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT chatzitheofilouismini anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT ryanfay anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT kaiserpeterk anefficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT mustondominic efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT korobelnikjeanfrancois efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT reasontim efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT hawkinsneil efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT chatzitheofilouismini efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT ryanfay efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata
AT kaiserpeterk efficacycomparisonofantivasculargrowthfactoragentsandlaserphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedemaanetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientleveldata