Cargando…

The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service

BACKGROUND: In patients who call for the emergency medical service (EMS), there is a knowledge gap with regard to the final assessment after arriving at hospital and its association with field assessment. AIM: In a representative population of patients who call for the EMS, to describe a) the final...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magnusson, Carl, Axelsson, Christer, Nilsson, Lena, Strömsöe, Anneli, Munters, Monica, Herlitz, Johan, Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0579-x
_version_ 1783382965297872896
author Magnusson, Carl
Axelsson, Christer
Nilsson, Lena
Strömsöe, Anneli
Munters, Monica
Herlitz, Johan
Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson
author_facet Magnusson, Carl
Axelsson, Christer
Nilsson, Lena
Strömsöe, Anneli
Munters, Monica
Herlitz, Johan
Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson
author_sort Magnusson, Carl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients who call for the emergency medical service (EMS), there is a knowledge gap with regard to the final assessment after arriving at hospital and its association with field assessment. AIM: In a representative population of patients who call for the EMS, to describe a) the final assessment at hospital discharge and b) the association between the assessment in the field and the assessment at hospital discharge. METHODS: Thirty randomly selected patients reached by a dispatched ambulance each month between 1 Jan and 31 Dec 2016 in one urban, one rural and one mixed ambulance organisation in Sweden took part in the study. The exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, dead on arrival, transport between health-care facilities and secondary missions. Each patient received a unique code based on the ICD code at hospital discharge and field assessment. RESULTS: In all, 1080 patients took part in the study, of which 1076 (99.6%) had a field assessment code. A total of 894 patients (83%) were brought to a hospital and an ICD code (ICD-10-SE) was available in 814 patients (91% of these cases and 76% of all cases included in the study). According to these ICD codes, the most frequent conditions were infection (15%), trauma (15%) and vascular disease (9%). The most frequent body localisation of the condition was the thorax (24%), head (16%) and abdomen (13%). In 118 patients (14% of all ICD codes), the condition according to the ICD code was judged as time critical. Among these cases, field assessment was assessed as potentially appropriate in 75% and potentially inappropriate in 12%. CONCLUSION: Among patients reached by ambulance in Sweden, 83% were transported to hospital and, among them, 14% had a time-critical condition. In these cases, the majority were assessed in the field as potentially appropriate, but 12% had a potentially inappropriate field assessment. The consequences of these findings need to be further explored. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0579-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63072532019-01-02 The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service Magnusson, Carl Axelsson, Christer Nilsson, Lena Strömsöe, Anneli Munters, Monica Herlitz, Johan Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In patients who call for the emergency medical service (EMS), there is a knowledge gap with regard to the final assessment after arriving at hospital and its association with field assessment. AIM: In a representative population of patients who call for the EMS, to describe a) the final assessment at hospital discharge and b) the association between the assessment in the field and the assessment at hospital discharge. METHODS: Thirty randomly selected patients reached by a dispatched ambulance each month between 1 Jan and 31 Dec 2016 in one urban, one rural and one mixed ambulance organisation in Sweden took part in the study. The exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, dead on arrival, transport between health-care facilities and secondary missions. Each patient received a unique code based on the ICD code at hospital discharge and field assessment. RESULTS: In all, 1080 patients took part in the study, of which 1076 (99.6%) had a field assessment code. A total of 894 patients (83%) were brought to a hospital and an ICD code (ICD-10-SE) was available in 814 patients (91% of these cases and 76% of all cases included in the study). According to these ICD codes, the most frequent conditions were infection (15%), trauma (15%) and vascular disease (9%). The most frequent body localisation of the condition was the thorax (24%), head (16%) and abdomen (13%). In 118 patients (14% of all ICD codes), the condition according to the ICD code was judged as time critical. Among these cases, field assessment was assessed as potentially appropriate in 75% and potentially inappropriate in 12%. CONCLUSION: Among patients reached by ambulance in Sweden, 83% were transported to hospital and, among them, 14% had a time-critical condition. In these cases, the majority were assessed in the field as potentially appropriate, but 12% had a potentially inappropriate field assessment. The consequences of these findings need to be further explored. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0579-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307253/ /pubmed/30587210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0579-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Magnusson, Carl
Axelsson, Christer
Nilsson, Lena
Strömsöe, Anneli
Munters, Monica
Herlitz, Johan
Hagiwara, Magnus Andersson
The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
title The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
title_full The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
title_fullStr The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
title_full_unstemmed The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
title_short The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
title_sort final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0579-x
work_keys_str_mv AT magnussoncarl thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT axelssonchrister thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT nilssonlena thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT stromsoeanneli thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT muntersmonica thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT herlitzjohan thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT hagiwaramagnusandersson thefinalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT magnussoncarl finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT axelssonchrister finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT nilssonlena finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT stromsoeanneli finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT muntersmonica finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT herlitzjohan finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice
AT hagiwaramagnusandersson finalassessmentanditsassociationwithfieldassessmentinpatientswhoweretransportedbytheemergencymedicalservice