Cargando…
High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
Tumors responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a higher level of immune infiltrates and/or an Interferon (IFN) signature indicative of a T-cell-inflamed phenotype. Melanoma and lung cancer demonstrate high response rates to ICIs and are commonly referred to as “hot tumors”. These are...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0479-7 |
_version_ | 1783382978776268800 |
---|---|
author | Maleki Vareki, Saman |
author_facet | Maleki Vareki, Saman |
author_sort | Maleki Vareki, Saman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumors responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a higher level of immune infiltrates and/or an Interferon (IFN) signature indicative of a T-cell-inflamed phenotype. Melanoma and lung cancer demonstrate high response rates to ICIs and are commonly referred to as “hot tumors”. These are in sharp contrast to tumors with low immune infiltrates called “cold tumors” or non-T-cell-inflamed cancers, such as those from the prostate and pancreas. Classification of tumors based on their immune phenotype can partially explain clinical response to ICIs. However, this model alone cannot fully explain the lack of response among many patients treated with ICIs. Dichotomizing tumors based on their mutation profile into high tumor mutation burden (TMB) or low TMB, such as many childhood malignancies, can also, to some extent, explain the clinical response to immunotherapy. This model mainly focuses on a tumor’s genotype rather than its immune phenotype. High TMB tumors often have higher levels of neoantigens that can be recognized by the immune system. In the current era of immunotherapy, with the lack of definitive biomarkers, we need to evaluate tumors based on both their immune phenotype and genomic mutation profile to determine which patients have a higher likelihood of responding to treatment with ICIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6307306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63073062019-01-02 High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors Maleki Vareki, Saman J Immunother Cancer Commentary Tumors responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a higher level of immune infiltrates and/or an Interferon (IFN) signature indicative of a T-cell-inflamed phenotype. Melanoma and lung cancer demonstrate high response rates to ICIs and are commonly referred to as “hot tumors”. These are in sharp contrast to tumors with low immune infiltrates called “cold tumors” or non-T-cell-inflamed cancers, such as those from the prostate and pancreas. Classification of tumors based on their immune phenotype can partially explain clinical response to ICIs. However, this model alone cannot fully explain the lack of response among many patients treated with ICIs. Dichotomizing tumors based on their mutation profile into high tumor mutation burden (TMB) or low TMB, such as many childhood malignancies, can also, to some extent, explain the clinical response to immunotherapy. This model mainly focuses on a tumor’s genotype rather than its immune phenotype. High TMB tumors often have higher levels of neoantigens that can be recognized by the immune system. In the current era of immunotherapy, with the lack of definitive biomarkers, we need to evaluate tumors based on both their immune phenotype and genomic mutation profile to determine which patients have a higher likelihood of responding to treatment with ICIs. BioMed Central 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307306/ /pubmed/30587233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0479-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Maleki Vareki, Saman High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
title | High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
title_full | High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
title_fullStr | High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
title_full_unstemmed | High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
title_short | High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
title_sort | high and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0479-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malekivarekisaman highandlowmutationalburdentumorsversusimmunologicallyhotandcoldtumorsandresponsetoimmunecheckpointinhibitors |