Cargando…

Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation

BACKGROUND: Overuse of unnecessary care is widespread around the world. This so-called low-value care provides no benefit for the patient, wastes resources and can cause harm. The concept of low-value care is broad and there are different reasons for care to be of low-value. Hence, different strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verkerk, Eva W, Tanke, Marit A C, Kool, Rudolf B, van Dulmen, Simone A, Westert, Gert P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29741672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy100
_version_ 1783382984931409920
author Verkerk, Eva W
Tanke, Marit A C
Kool, Rudolf B
van Dulmen, Simone A
Westert, Gert P
author_facet Verkerk, Eva W
Tanke, Marit A C
Kool, Rudolf B
van Dulmen, Simone A
Westert, Gert P
author_sort Verkerk, Eva W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Overuse of unnecessary care is widespread around the world. This so-called low-value care provides no benefit for the patient, wastes resources and can cause harm. The concept of low-value care is broad and there are different reasons for care to be of low-value. Hence, different strategies might be necessary to reduce it and awareness of this may help in designing a de-implementation strategy. Based on a literature scan and discussions with experts, we identified three types of low-value care. RESULTS: The type ineffective care is proven ineffective, such as antibiotics for a viral infection. Inefficient care is in essence effective, but is of low-value through inefficient provision or inappropriate intensity, such as chronic benzodiazepine use. Unwanted care is in essence appropriate for the clinical condition it targets, but is low-value since it does not fit the patients’ preferences, such as a treatment aimed to cure a patient that prefers palliative care. In this paper, we argue that these three types differ in their most promising strategy for de-implementation and that our typology gives direction in choosing whether to limit, lean or listen. CONCLUSION: We developed a typology that provides insight in the different reasons for care to be of low-value. We believe that this typology is helpful in designing a tailor-made strategy for reducing low-value care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63073342019-01-07 Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation Verkerk, Eva W Tanke, Marit A C Kool, Rudolf B van Dulmen, Simone A Westert, Gert P Int J Qual Health Care Perspectives on Quality BACKGROUND: Overuse of unnecessary care is widespread around the world. This so-called low-value care provides no benefit for the patient, wastes resources and can cause harm. The concept of low-value care is broad and there are different reasons for care to be of low-value. Hence, different strategies might be necessary to reduce it and awareness of this may help in designing a de-implementation strategy. Based on a literature scan and discussions with experts, we identified three types of low-value care. RESULTS: The type ineffective care is proven ineffective, such as antibiotics for a viral infection. Inefficient care is in essence effective, but is of low-value through inefficient provision or inappropriate intensity, such as chronic benzodiazepine use. Unwanted care is in essence appropriate for the clinical condition it targets, but is low-value since it does not fit the patients’ preferences, such as a treatment aimed to cure a patient that prefers palliative care. In this paper, we argue that these three types differ in their most promising strategy for de-implementation and that our typology gives direction in choosing whether to limit, lean or listen. CONCLUSION: We developed a typology that provides insight in the different reasons for care to be of low-value. We believe that this typology is helpful in designing a tailor-made strategy for reducing low-value care. Oxford University Press 2018-11 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6307334/ /pubmed/29741672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy100 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspectives on Quality
Verkerk, Eva W
Tanke, Marit A C
Kool, Rudolf B
van Dulmen, Simone A
Westert, Gert P
Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
title Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
title_full Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
title_fullStr Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
title_full_unstemmed Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
title_short Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
title_sort limit, lean or listen? a typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation
topic Perspectives on Quality
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29741672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy100
work_keys_str_mv AT verkerkevaw limitleanorlistenatypologyoflowvaluecarethatgivesdirectionindeimplementation
AT tankemaritac limitleanorlistenatypologyoflowvaluecarethatgivesdirectionindeimplementation
AT koolrudolfb limitleanorlistenatypologyoflowvaluecarethatgivesdirectionindeimplementation
AT vandulmensimonea limitleanorlistenatypologyoflowvaluecarethatgivesdirectionindeimplementation
AT westertgertp limitleanorlistenatypologyoflowvaluecarethatgivesdirectionindeimplementation