Cargando…

Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND: Approximately 8% of traumatically injured patients require transfusion with packed red blood cells (pRBC) and only 1% to 2% require massive transfusion. Intraoperative massive transfusion was defined as requiring greater than 5 units (u) of pRBC in 4 hours. Despite the majority of patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Jennifer E, Martin, Grace E, Katsaros, Gianna, Lewis, Hannah V, Wakefield, Connor J, Josephs, Sean A, Nomellini, Vanessa, Makley, Amy T, Goodman, Michael D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000240
_version_ 1783383027786711040
author Baker, Jennifer E
Martin, Grace E
Katsaros, Gianna
Lewis, Hannah V
Wakefield, Connor J
Josephs, Sean A
Nomellini, Vanessa
Makley, Amy T
Goodman, Michael D
author_facet Baker, Jennifer E
Martin, Grace E
Katsaros, Gianna
Lewis, Hannah V
Wakefield, Connor J
Josephs, Sean A
Nomellini, Vanessa
Makley, Amy T
Goodman, Michael D
author_sort Baker, Jennifer E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 8% of traumatically injured patients require transfusion with packed red blood cells (pRBC) and only 1% to 2% require massive transfusion. Intraoperative massive transfusion was defined as requiring greater than 5 units (u) of pRBC in 4 hours. Despite the majority of patients not requiring transfusion, the appropriate amount and type of crystalloid administered during the era of damage control resuscitation have not been analyzed. We sought to determine the types of crystalloid used during trauma laparotomies and the potential effects on resuscitation. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparotomy after abdominal trauma from January 2014 to December 2016 at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center were identified. Patients were grouped based on requiring 0u, 1u to 4u, and ≥5u pRBC during intraoperative resuscitation. Demographic, physiologic, pharmacologic, operative, and postoperative data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution was the most used crystalloid type received in the 0u and 1u to 4u pRBC cohorts, whereas normal saline (NS) was the most common in the ≥5u pRBC cohort. Most patients received two types of crystalloid intraoperatively. NS and LR were most frequently the first crystalloids administered, with Normosol infusion occurring later. The amount of crystalloid received correlated with operative length, but did not correlate with the estimated blood loss. Neither the type of crystalloid administered nor the anesthesia provider type was associated with changes in postoperative resuscitation parameters or electrolyte concentrations. DISCUSSION: There is a wide variation in the amount and types of crystalloids administered during exploratory laparotomy for trauma. Interestingly, the amount or type of crystalloid given did not affect resuscitation parameters regardless of blood product requirement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63075762019-01-08 Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma Baker, Jennifer E Martin, Grace E Katsaros, Gianna Lewis, Hannah V Wakefield, Connor J Josephs, Sean A Nomellini, Vanessa Makley, Amy T Goodman, Michael D Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 8% of traumatically injured patients require transfusion with packed red blood cells (pRBC) and only 1% to 2% require massive transfusion. Intraoperative massive transfusion was defined as requiring greater than 5 units (u) of pRBC in 4 hours. Despite the majority of patients not requiring transfusion, the appropriate amount and type of crystalloid administered during the era of damage control resuscitation have not been analyzed. We sought to determine the types of crystalloid used during trauma laparotomies and the potential effects on resuscitation. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparotomy after abdominal trauma from January 2014 to December 2016 at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center were identified. Patients were grouped based on requiring 0u, 1u to 4u, and ≥5u pRBC during intraoperative resuscitation. Demographic, physiologic, pharmacologic, operative, and postoperative data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution was the most used crystalloid type received in the 0u and 1u to 4u pRBC cohorts, whereas normal saline (NS) was the most common in the ≥5u pRBC cohort. Most patients received two types of crystalloid intraoperatively. NS and LR were most frequently the first crystalloids administered, with Normosol infusion occurring later. The amount of crystalloid received correlated with operative length, but did not correlate with the estimated blood loss. Neither the type of crystalloid administered nor the anesthesia provider type was associated with changes in postoperative resuscitation parameters or electrolyte concentrations. DISCUSSION: There is a wide variation in the amount and types of crystalloids administered during exploratory laparotomy for trauma. Interestingly, the amount or type of crystalloid given did not affect resuscitation parameters regardless of blood product requirement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6307576/ /pubmed/30623027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000240 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an Open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baker, Jennifer E
Martin, Grace E
Katsaros, Gianna
Lewis, Hannah V
Wakefield, Connor J
Josephs, Sean A
Nomellini, Vanessa
Makley, Amy T
Goodman, Michael D
Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
title Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
title_full Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
title_fullStr Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
title_full_unstemmed Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
title_short Variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
title_sort variability of fluid administration during exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000240
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerjennifere variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT martingracee variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT katsarosgianna variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT lewishannahv variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT wakefieldconnorj variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT josephsseana variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT nomellinivanessa variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT makleyamyt variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma
AT goodmanmichaeld variabilityoffluidadministrationduringexploratorylaparotomyforabdominaltrauma