Cargando…

Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients

Patients value effective pain relief. Complications of inadequate pain control include increased risk of infection, decreased patient comfort and progression to chronic pain, all of which have significant socioeconomic consequence. Accessibility to analgesia is vital to effective administration. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanger, Sophie, Dahill, Mark, Hillary, Charlotte, Whitham, Robert, Tasker, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000397
_version_ 1783383028527005696
author Stanger, Sophie
Dahill, Mark
Hillary, Charlotte
Whitham, Robert
Tasker, Andrew
author_facet Stanger, Sophie
Dahill, Mark
Hillary, Charlotte
Whitham, Robert
Tasker, Andrew
author_sort Stanger, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Patients value effective pain relief. Complications of inadequate pain control include increased risk of infection, decreased patient comfort and progression to chronic pain, all of which have significant socioeconomic consequence. Accessibility to analgesia is vital to effective administration. This improvement project aimed to improve the consistency and adequacy of analgesia prescribing for trauma inpatients over a 12-month period. Four PDSA (‘plan, do, study, act’) cycles resulted in sustained and significant improvements in analgesia prescription. The interventions included senior encouragement, teaching sessions, targeted inductions and implementation of a novel e-prescribing protocol. Prospective data and real-time discussion from stakeholder medical and management teams enabled iterative change to practice. Drug charts were reviewed for all trauma inpatients (n=276) over a 10-month period, recording all analgesia prescribed within 24 hours of admission. Each prescription was scored (maximum of 10 points) according to parameters agreed by the acute pain specialty leaders. An improving trend was observed in the analgesia score over the study period. Each intervention was associated with improved practice. Based on observed improvements, a novel electronic prescribing protocol was developed in conjunction with the information technology department, resulting in maximum scores for prescribing which were sustained over the final 3 months of the study. This was subsequently adopted as standard practice within the department. One year following completion of the project, a further 3 weeks of data were collected to assess long-term sustainability—scores remained 10 out of 10. Addressing the prescribing habits of junior doctors improved accessibility to analgesia for trauma patients. The electronic prescribing tool made prescribing straightforward and faster, and was the most successful intervention. Doctor satisfaction using this time-saving tool was high. Identifying a stakeholder within the information technology department proved pivotal to transferring the project aims into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63075792019-01-08 Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients Stanger, Sophie Dahill, Mark Hillary, Charlotte Whitham, Robert Tasker, Andrew BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report Patients value effective pain relief. Complications of inadequate pain control include increased risk of infection, decreased patient comfort and progression to chronic pain, all of which have significant socioeconomic consequence. Accessibility to analgesia is vital to effective administration. This improvement project aimed to improve the consistency and adequacy of analgesia prescribing for trauma inpatients over a 12-month period. Four PDSA (‘plan, do, study, act’) cycles resulted in sustained and significant improvements in analgesia prescription. The interventions included senior encouragement, teaching sessions, targeted inductions and implementation of a novel e-prescribing protocol. Prospective data and real-time discussion from stakeholder medical and management teams enabled iterative change to practice. Drug charts were reviewed for all trauma inpatients (n=276) over a 10-month period, recording all analgesia prescribed within 24 hours of admission. Each prescription was scored (maximum of 10 points) according to parameters agreed by the acute pain specialty leaders. An improving trend was observed in the analgesia score over the study period. Each intervention was associated with improved practice. Based on observed improvements, a novel electronic prescribing protocol was developed in conjunction with the information technology department, resulting in maximum scores for prescribing which were sustained over the final 3 months of the study. This was subsequently adopted as standard practice within the department. One year following completion of the project, a further 3 weeks of data were collected to assess long-term sustainability—scores remained 10 out of 10. Addressing the prescribing habits of junior doctors improved accessibility to analgesia for trauma patients. The electronic prescribing tool made prescribing straightforward and faster, and was the most successful intervention. Doctor satisfaction using this time-saving tool was high. Identifying a stakeholder within the information technology department proved pivotal to transferring the project aims into clinical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6307579/ /pubmed/30623112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000397 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement report
Stanger, Sophie
Dahill, Mark
Hillary, Charlotte
Whitham, Robert
Tasker, Andrew
Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
title Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
title_full Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
title_fullStr Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
title_full_unstemmed Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
title_short Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
title_sort improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients
topic BMJ Quality Improvement report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000397
work_keys_str_mv AT stangersophie improvinganalgesiaprescriptionfortraumainpatients
AT dahillmark improvinganalgesiaprescriptionfortraumainpatients
AT hillarycharlotte improvinganalgesiaprescriptionfortraumainpatients
AT whithamrobert improvinganalgesiaprescriptionfortraumainpatients
AT taskerandrew improvinganalgesiaprescriptionfortraumainpatients