Cargando…

Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume

OBJECTIVE: Recognizing what physicians know and do not know about a particular disease is one of the keys to designing clinical decision support systems, since these systems can fulfill complementary role by recognizing this boundary. To our knowledge, however, no study has attempted to quantify how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Hiroaki, Ueda, Kazuhiro, Watanuki, Satoshi, Watari, Takashi, Tokuda, Yasuharu, Okumura, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30589866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209551
_version_ 1783383047910981632
author Tanaka, Hiroaki
Ueda, Kazuhiro
Watanuki, Satoshi
Watari, Takashi
Tokuda, Yasuharu
Okumura, Takashi
author_facet Tanaka, Hiroaki
Ueda, Kazuhiro
Watanuki, Satoshi
Watari, Takashi
Tokuda, Yasuharu
Okumura, Takashi
author_sort Tanaka, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recognizing what physicians know and do not know about a particular disease is one of the keys to designing clinical decision support systems, since these systems can fulfill complementary role by recognizing this boundary. To our knowledge, however, no study has attempted to quantify how many diseases physicians actually know and thus the boundary is unclear. This study explores a method to solve this problem by investigating whether the vocabulary assessment techniques developed in the linguistics field can be applied to assess physicians’ knowledge. METHODS: The test design required us to pay special attention to disease knowledge assessment. First, to avoid imposing unnecessary burdens on the physicians, we chose a self-assessment questionnaire that was straightforward to fill out. Second, to prevent overestimation, we used a “pseudo-word” approach: fictitious diseases were included in the questionnaire, and positive responses to them were penalized. Third, we used paper-based tests, rather than computer-based ones, to further prevent participants from cheating by using a search engine. Fourth, we selectively used borderline diseases, i.e., diseases that physicians might or might not know about, rather than well-known or little-known diseases, in the questionnaire. RESULTS: We collected 102 valid answers from 109 physicians who attended the seminars we conducted. On the basis of these answers, we estimated that the average physician knew of 2008 diseases (95% confidence interval: (1939, 2071)). This preliminary estimation agrees with the guideline for the national license examination in Japan, suggesting that this vocabulary assessment was able to evaluate physicians’ knowledge. The survey included physicians with various backgrounds, but there were no significant differences between subgroups. Other implication for researches on clinical decision support and limitation of the sampling method adopted in this study are also discussed, toward more rigorous estimation in future surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6307700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63077002019-01-08 Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume Tanaka, Hiroaki Ueda, Kazuhiro Watanuki, Satoshi Watari, Takashi Tokuda, Yasuharu Okumura, Takashi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Recognizing what physicians know and do not know about a particular disease is one of the keys to designing clinical decision support systems, since these systems can fulfill complementary role by recognizing this boundary. To our knowledge, however, no study has attempted to quantify how many diseases physicians actually know and thus the boundary is unclear. This study explores a method to solve this problem by investigating whether the vocabulary assessment techniques developed in the linguistics field can be applied to assess physicians’ knowledge. METHODS: The test design required us to pay special attention to disease knowledge assessment. First, to avoid imposing unnecessary burdens on the physicians, we chose a self-assessment questionnaire that was straightforward to fill out. Second, to prevent overestimation, we used a “pseudo-word” approach: fictitious diseases were included in the questionnaire, and positive responses to them were penalized. Third, we used paper-based tests, rather than computer-based ones, to further prevent participants from cheating by using a search engine. Fourth, we selectively used borderline diseases, i.e., diseases that physicians might or might not know about, rather than well-known or little-known diseases, in the questionnaire. RESULTS: We collected 102 valid answers from 109 physicians who attended the seminars we conducted. On the basis of these answers, we estimated that the average physician knew of 2008 diseases (95% confidence interval: (1939, 2071)). This preliminary estimation agrees with the guideline for the national license examination in Japan, suggesting that this vocabulary assessment was able to evaluate physicians’ knowledge. The survey included physicians with various backgrounds, but there were no significant differences between subgroups. Other implication for researches on clinical decision support and limitation of the sampling method adopted in this study are also discussed, toward more rigorous estimation in future surveys. Public Library of Science 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6307700/ /pubmed/30589866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209551 Text en © 2018 Tanaka et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanaka, Hiroaki
Ueda, Kazuhiro
Watanuki, Satoshi
Watari, Takashi
Tokuda, Yasuharu
Okumura, Takashi
Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
title Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
title_full Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
title_fullStr Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
title_full_unstemmed Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
title_short Disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
title_sort disease vocabulary size as a surrogate marker for physicians’ disease knowledge volume
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6307700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30589866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209551
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakahiroaki diseasevocabularysizeasasurrogatemarkerforphysiciansdiseaseknowledgevolume
AT uedakazuhiro diseasevocabularysizeasasurrogatemarkerforphysiciansdiseaseknowledgevolume
AT watanukisatoshi diseasevocabularysizeasasurrogatemarkerforphysiciansdiseaseknowledgevolume
AT wataritakashi diseasevocabularysizeasasurrogatemarkerforphysiciansdiseaseknowledgevolume
AT tokudayasuharu diseasevocabularysizeasasurrogatemarkerforphysiciansdiseaseknowledgevolume
AT okumuratakashi diseasevocabularysizeasasurrogatemarkerforphysiciansdiseaseknowledgevolume