Cargando…

Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To observe the local regression and control in T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to analyze the related influencing factors. METHODS: Between January 2006 and June 2014, 247 consecutive T1‐2 NPC patients treated with IMRT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Fen, Ou, Dan, Hu, Chaosu, He, Xiayun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1866
_version_ 1783383109849317376
author Xue, Fen
Ou, Dan
Hu, Chaosu
He, Xiayun
author_facet Xue, Fen
Ou, Dan
Hu, Chaosu
He, Xiayun
author_sort Xue, Fen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To observe the local regression and control in T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to analyze the related influencing factors. METHODS: Between January 2006 and June 2014, 247 consecutive T1‐2 NPC patients treated with IMRT were retrospectively analyzed, with 126 (51.0%) N0‐1 disease and 121 (49.0%) N2‐3 disease. Among them, 72.9% received platinum‐based chemotherapy. The prescribed dose to gross tumor volume was 66 Gy/30 fractions. RESULTS: By the end of IMRT, the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group had higher local complete response (CR) rate compared with IMRT alone group (92.2% vs 74.6%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was discovered in 5‐year local control (LC) rate (95.1% vs 94.9%, P = 0.968). Of the rest 31 patients with residual nasopharyngeal lesions after IMRT, those received boost irradiation (67.7%) also showed no improvement in 5‐year LC rate compared with the observational group (95.0% vs 100.0%, P = 0.307). With a median follow‐up of 63 months, the estimated 5‐year LC rate for the whole group was 95.1% (T1 vs T2: 95.9% vs 94.7%, P = 0.186). Prognostic factors for LC were found neither in univariate nor in multivariate analysis. Advanced N stage was found to be the only adverse prognostic factor for all the other survivals. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent LC could be achieved in T1‐2 NPC treated with IMRT. The addition of chemotherapy may offer short‐term response benefit, but no significant LC benefit, so did boost irradiation. Attention should be attached to advanced N stage, the exploration of the recurrence‐related factors, and the necessities of the additional treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63080442019-01-03 Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy Xue, Fen Ou, Dan Hu, Chaosu He, Xiayun Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research OBJECTIVE: To observe the local regression and control in T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to analyze the related influencing factors. METHODS: Between January 2006 and June 2014, 247 consecutive T1‐2 NPC patients treated with IMRT were retrospectively analyzed, with 126 (51.0%) N0‐1 disease and 121 (49.0%) N2‐3 disease. Among them, 72.9% received platinum‐based chemotherapy. The prescribed dose to gross tumor volume was 66 Gy/30 fractions. RESULTS: By the end of IMRT, the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group had higher local complete response (CR) rate compared with IMRT alone group (92.2% vs 74.6%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was discovered in 5‐year local control (LC) rate (95.1% vs 94.9%, P = 0.968). Of the rest 31 patients with residual nasopharyngeal lesions after IMRT, those received boost irradiation (67.7%) also showed no improvement in 5‐year LC rate compared with the observational group (95.0% vs 100.0%, P = 0.307). With a median follow‐up of 63 months, the estimated 5‐year LC rate for the whole group was 95.1% (T1 vs T2: 95.9% vs 94.7%, P = 0.186). Prognostic factors for LC were found neither in univariate nor in multivariate analysis. Advanced N stage was found to be the only adverse prognostic factor for all the other survivals. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent LC could be achieved in T1‐2 NPC treated with IMRT. The addition of chemotherapy may offer short‐term response benefit, but no significant LC benefit, so did boost irradiation. Attention should be attached to advanced N stage, the exploration of the recurrence‐related factors, and the necessities of the additional treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6308044/ /pubmed/30406969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1866 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Xue, Fen
Ou, Dan
Hu, Chaosu
He, Xiayun
Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
title Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
title_full Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
title_short Local regression and control of T1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
title_sort local regression and control of t1‐2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1866
work_keys_str_mv AT xuefen localregressionandcontroloft12nasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT oudan localregressionandcontroloft12nasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT huchaosu localregressionandcontroloft12nasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT hexiayun localregressionandcontroloft12nasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapy