Cargando…

Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamai, Hideyuki, Shingaki, Naoki, Ida, Yoshiyuki, Shimizu, Ryo, Maeshima, Shuya, Okamura, Junpei, Kawashima, Akira, Nakao, Taisei, Hara, Takeshi, Matsutani, Hiroyoshi, Nishikawa, Izumi, Higashi, Katsuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHODS: We treated 509 patients using standard doses of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. As sustained virological response (SVR) in 2 patients could not be evaluated, 507 patients were finally analyzed. Patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure were excluded. RESULTS: Four patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. SVR rates for the overall cohort, patients <65 years old, ≥65 and <75 years old, and ≥75 years old were 98% (495/507), 98% (161/163), 96% (179/186), and 98% (155/158), respectively. SVR rates among cirrhotic patients, patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, patients with protease inhibitor (PI) triple therapy failure, and patients with resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) to nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) were 97% (228/235), 98% (117/119), 95% (95/100), 94% (46/49), and 92% (44/48), respectively. In the comparison of factors between patients with and without SVR, high body weight, discontinuation of therapy, and NS5A RASs were significantly associated with non‐SVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world setting, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were a safe treatment even in patients ≥75 years old. When patients without pre‐existing NS5A RASs and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure are selected, extremely high SVR rates can be achieved irrespective of age.