Cargando…

Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamai, Hideyuki, Shingaki, Naoki, Ida, Yoshiyuki, Shimizu, Ryo, Maeshima, Shuya, Okamura, Junpei, Kawashima, Akira, Nakao, Taisei, Hara, Takeshi, Matsutani, Hiroyoshi, Nishikawa, Izumi, Higashi, Katsuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088
_version_ 1783383114445225984
author Tamai, Hideyuki
Shingaki, Naoki
Ida, Yoshiyuki
Shimizu, Ryo
Maeshima, Shuya
Okamura, Junpei
Kawashima, Akira
Nakao, Taisei
Hara, Takeshi
Matsutani, Hiroyoshi
Nishikawa, Izumi
Higashi, Katsuhiko
author_facet Tamai, Hideyuki
Shingaki, Naoki
Ida, Yoshiyuki
Shimizu, Ryo
Maeshima, Shuya
Okamura, Junpei
Kawashima, Akira
Nakao, Taisei
Hara, Takeshi
Matsutani, Hiroyoshi
Nishikawa, Izumi
Higashi, Katsuhiko
author_sort Tamai, Hideyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHODS: We treated 509 patients using standard doses of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. As sustained virological response (SVR) in 2 patients could not be evaluated, 507 patients were finally analyzed. Patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure were excluded. RESULTS: Four patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. SVR rates for the overall cohort, patients <65 years old, ≥65 and <75 years old, and ≥75 years old were 98% (495/507), 98% (161/163), 96% (179/186), and 98% (155/158), respectively. SVR rates among cirrhotic patients, patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, patients with protease inhibitor (PI) triple therapy failure, and patients with resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) to nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) were 97% (228/235), 98% (117/119), 95% (95/100), 94% (46/49), and 92% (44/48), respectively. In the comparison of factors between patients with and without SVR, high body weight, discontinuation of therapy, and NS5A RASs were significantly associated with non‐SVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world setting, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were a safe treatment even in patients ≥75 years old. When patients without pre‐existing NS5A RASs and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure are selected, extremely high SVR rates can be achieved irrespective of age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63080622019-01-07 Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients Tamai, Hideyuki Shingaki, Naoki Ida, Yoshiyuki Shimizu, Ryo Maeshima, Shuya Okamura, Junpei Kawashima, Akira Nakao, Taisei Hara, Takeshi Matsutani, Hiroyoshi Nishikawa, Izumi Higashi, Katsuhiko JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHODS: We treated 509 patients using standard doses of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. As sustained virological response (SVR) in 2 patients could not be evaluated, 507 patients were finally analyzed. Patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure were excluded. RESULTS: Four patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. SVR rates for the overall cohort, patients <65 years old, ≥65 and <75 years old, and ≥75 years old were 98% (495/507), 98% (161/163), 96% (179/186), and 98% (155/158), respectively. SVR rates among cirrhotic patients, patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, patients with protease inhibitor (PI) triple therapy failure, and patients with resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) to nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) were 97% (228/235), 98% (117/119), 95% (95/100), 94% (46/49), and 92% (44/48), respectively. In the comparison of factors between patients with and without SVR, high body weight, discontinuation of therapy, and NS5A RASs were significantly associated with non‐SVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world setting, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were a safe treatment even in patients ≥75 years old. When patients without pre‐existing NS5A RASs and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure are selected, extremely high SVR rates can be achieved irrespective of age. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6308062/ /pubmed/30619941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tamai, Hideyuki
Shingaki, Naoki
Ida, Yoshiyuki
Shimizu, Ryo
Maeshima, Shuya
Okamura, Junpei
Kawashima, Akira
Nakao, Taisei
Hara, Takeshi
Matsutani, Hiroyoshi
Nishikawa, Izumi
Higashi, Katsuhiko
Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
title Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
title_full Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
title_fullStr Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
title_full_unstemmed Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
title_short Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
title_sort real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaihideyuki realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT shingakinaoki realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT idayoshiyuki realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT shimizuryo realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT maeshimashuya realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT okamurajunpei realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT kawashimaakira realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT nakaotaisei realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT haratakeshi realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT matsutanihiroyoshi realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT nishikawaizumi realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients
AT higashikatsuhiko realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients