Cargando…
Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088 |
_version_ | 1783383114445225984 |
---|---|
author | Tamai, Hideyuki Shingaki, Naoki Ida, Yoshiyuki Shimizu, Ryo Maeshima, Shuya Okamura, Junpei Kawashima, Akira Nakao, Taisei Hara, Takeshi Matsutani, Hiroyoshi Nishikawa, Izumi Higashi, Katsuhiko |
author_facet | Tamai, Hideyuki Shingaki, Naoki Ida, Yoshiyuki Shimizu, Ryo Maeshima, Shuya Okamura, Junpei Kawashima, Akira Nakao, Taisei Hara, Takeshi Matsutani, Hiroyoshi Nishikawa, Izumi Higashi, Katsuhiko |
author_sort | Tamai, Hideyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHODS: We treated 509 patients using standard doses of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. As sustained virological response (SVR) in 2 patients could not be evaluated, 507 patients were finally analyzed. Patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure were excluded. RESULTS: Four patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. SVR rates for the overall cohort, patients <65 years old, ≥65 and <75 years old, and ≥75 years old were 98% (495/507), 98% (161/163), 96% (179/186), and 98% (155/158), respectively. SVR rates among cirrhotic patients, patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, patients with protease inhibitor (PI) triple therapy failure, and patients with resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) to nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) were 97% (228/235), 98% (117/119), 95% (95/100), 94% (46/49), and 92% (44/48), respectively. In the comparison of factors between patients with and without SVR, high body weight, discontinuation of therapy, and NS5A RASs were significantly associated with non‐SVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world setting, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were a safe treatment even in patients ≥75 years old. When patients without pre‐existing NS5A RASs and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure are selected, extremely high SVR rates can be achieved irrespective of age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6308062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63080622019-01-07 Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients Tamai, Hideyuki Shingaki, Naoki Ida, Yoshiyuki Shimizu, Ryo Maeshima, Shuya Okamura, Junpei Kawashima, Akira Nakao, Taisei Hara, Takeshi Matsutani, Hiroyoshi Nishikawa, Izumi Higashi, Katsuhiko JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: In September 2015, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were approved for clinical use in Japan for patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus. We conducted a postmarketing prospective cohort study to elucidate the safety and efficacy of this therapy in a real‐world setting. METHODS: We treated 509 patients using standard doses of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. As sustained virological response (SVR) in 2 patients could not be evaluated, 507 patients were finally analyzed. Patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure were excluded. RESULTS: Four patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. SVR rates for the overall cohort, patients <65 years old, ≥65 and <75 years old, and ≥75 years old were 98% (495/507), 98% (161/163), 96% (179/186), and 98% (155/158), respectively. SVR rates among cirrhotic patients, patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, patients with protease inhibitor (PI) triple therapy failure, and patients with resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) to nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) were 97% (228/235), 98% (117/119), 95% (95/100), 94% (46/49), and 92% (44/48), respectively. In the comparison of factors between patients with and without SVR, high body weight, discontinuation of therapy, and NS5A RASs were significantly associated with non‐SVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this real‐world setting, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were a safe treatment even in patients ≥75 years old. When patients without pre‐existing NS5A RASs and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir failure are selected, extremely high SVR rates can be achieved irrespective of age. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6308062/ /pubmed/30619941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tamai, Hideyuki Shingaki, Naoki Ida, Yoshiyuki Shimizu, Ryo Maeshima, Shuya Okamura, Junpei Kawashima, Akira Nakao, Taisei Hara, Takeshi Matsutani, Hiroyoshi Nishikawa, Izumi Higashi, Katsuhiko Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
title | Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
title_full | Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
title_fullStr | Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
title_short | Real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
title_sort | real‐world safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for elderly patients |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamaihideyuki realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT shingakinaoki realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT idayoshiyuki realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT shimizuryo realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT maeshimashuya realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT okamurajunpei realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT kawashimaakira realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT nakaotaisei realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT haratakeshi realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT matsutanihiroyoshi realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT nishikawaizumi realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients AT higashikatsuhiko realworldsafetyandefficacyofsofosbuvirandledipasvirforelderlypatients |