Cargando…

Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response

Purpose: To assess the nature and extent of non-linear processes in pupil responses using rod- and cone-isolating visual beat stimuli. Methods: A four-primary photostimulating method based on the principle of silent substitution was implemented to generate rod or cone isolating and combined sinusoid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrionuevo, Pablo Alejandro, McAnany, J. Jason, Zele, Andrew J., Cao, Dingcai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30622511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01140
_version_ 1783383140212932608
author Barrionuevo, Pablo Alejandro
McAnany, J. Jason
Zele, Andrew J.
Cao, Dingcai
author_facet Barrionuevo, Pablo Alejandro
McAnany, J. Jason
Zele, Andrew J.
Cao, Dingcai
author_sort Barrionuevo, Pablo Alejandro
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To assess the nature and extent of non-linear processes in pupil responses using rod- and cone-isolating visual beat stimuli. Methods: A four-primary photostimulating method based on the principle of silent substitution was implemented to generate rod or cone isolating and combined sinusoidal stimuli at a single component frequency (1, 4, 5, 8, or 9 Hz) or a 1 Hz beat frequency (frequency pairs: 4 + 5, 8 + 9 Hz). The component frequencies were chosen to minimize the melanopsin photoresponse of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) such that the pupil response was primarily driven by outer retinal photoreceptor inputs. Full-field (Ganzfeld) pupil responses and electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded to the same stimuli at two mesopic light levels (−0.9 and 0 log cd/m(2)). Fourier analysis was used to derive the amplitudes and phases of the pupil and ERG responses. Results: For the beat frequency condition, when modulation was restricted to the same photoreceptor type at the higher mesopic level (0 log cd/m(2)), there was a pronounced pupil response to the 1 Hz beat frequency with the 4 + 5 Hz frequency pair and rare beat responses for the 8 + 9 Hz frequency pair. At the lower mesopic level there were few and inconsistent beat responses. When one component modulated the rod excitation and the other component modulated the cone excitation, responses to the beat frequency were rare and lower than the 1 Hz component frequency condition responses. These results were confirmed by ERG recordings. Conclusions: There is non-linearity in both the pupil response and electroretinogram to rod and cone inputs at mesopic light levels. The presence of a beat response for modulation components restricted to a single photoreceptor type, but not for components with cross-photoreceptor types, indicates that the location of a non-linear process in the pupil pathway occurs at a retinal site earlier than where the rod and cone signals are combined, that is, at the photoreceptor level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63081912019-01-08 Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response Barrionuevo, Pablo Alejandro McAnany, J. Jason Zele, Andrew J. Cao, Dingcai Front Neurol Neurology Purpose: To assess the nature and extent of non-linear processes in pupil responses using rod- and cone-isolating visual beat stimuli. Methods: A four-primary photostimulating method based on the principle of silent substitution was implemented to generate rod or cone isolating and combined sinusoidal stimuli at a single component frequency (1, 4, 5, 8, or 9 Hz) or a 1 Hz beat frequency (frequency pairs: 4 + 5, 8 + 9 Hz). The component frequencies were chosen to minimize the melanopsin photoresponse of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) such that the pupil response was primarily driven by outer retinal photoreceptor inputs. Full-field (Ganzfeld) pupil responses and electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded to the same stimuli at two mesopic light levels (−0.9 and 0 log cd/m(2)). Fourier analysis was used to derive the amplitudes and phases of the pupil and ERG responses. Results: For the beat frequency condition, when modulation was restricted to the same photoreceptor type at the higher mesopic level (0 log cd/m(2)), there was a pronounced pupil response to the 1 Hz beat frequency with the 4 + 5 Hz frequency pair and rare beat responses for the 8 + 9 Hz frequency pair. At the lower mesopic level there were few and inconsistent beat responses. When one component modulated the rod excitation and the other component modulated the cone excitation, responses to the beat frequency were rare and lower than the 1 Hz component frequency condition responses. These results were confirmed by ERG recordings. Conclusions: There is non-linearity in both the pupil response and electroretinogram to rod and cone inputs at mesopic light levels. The presence of a beat response for modulation components restricted to a single photoreceptor type, but not for components with cross-photoreceptor types, indicates that the location of a non-linear process in the pupil pathway occurs at a retinal site earlier than where the rod and cone signals are combined, that is, at the photoreceptor level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6308191/ /pubmed/30622511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01140 Text en Copyright © 2018 Barrionuevo, McAnany, Zele and Cao. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Barrionuevo, Pablo Alejandro
McAnany, J. Jason
Zele, Andrew J.
Cao, Dingcai
Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response
title Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response
title_full Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response
title_fullStr Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response
title_full_unstemmed Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response
title_short Non-linearities in the Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Inputs to the Afferent Pupil Light Response
title_sort non-linearities in the rod and cone photoreceptor inputs to the afferent pupil light response
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30622511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01140
work_keys_str_mv AT barrionuevopabloalejandro nonlinearitiesintherodandconephotoreceptorinputstotheafferentpupillightresponse
AT mcananyjjason nonlinearitiesintherodandconephotoreceptorinputstotheafferentpupillightresponse
AT zeleandrewj nonlinearitiesintherodandconephotoreceptorinputstotheafferentpupillightresponse
AT caodingcai nonlinearitiesintherodandconephotoreceptorinputstotheafferentpupillightresponse