Cargando…
Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response
DNA double-strand breaks pose a direct threat to genomic stability. Studies of DNA damage and chromatin dynamics have yielded opposing results that support either increased or decreased chromatin motion after damage. In this study, we independently measure the dynamics of transcriptionally active or...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36343-x |
_version_ | 1783383151204106240 |
---|---|
author | Whitefield, Daniel B. Spagnol, Stephen T. Armiger, Travis J. Lan, Li Dahl, Kris Noel |
author_facet | Whitefield, Daniel B. Spagnol, Stephen T. Armiger, Travis J. Lan, Li Dahl, Kris Noel |
author_sort | Whitefield, Daniel B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA double-strand breaks pose a direct threat to genomic stability. Studies of DNA damage and chromatin dynamics have yielded opposing results that support either increased or decreased chromatin motion after damage. In this study, we independently measure the dynamics of transcriptionally active or repressed chromatin regions using particle tracking microrheology. We find that the baseline motion of transcriptionally repressed regions of chromatin are significantly less mobile than transcriptionally active chromatin, which is statistically similar to the bulk motion of chromatin within the nucleus. Site specific DNA damage using KillerRed tags induced in loci within repressed chromatin causes an increased motion, while loci within transcriptionally active regions remains unchanged at similar time scales. We also observe a time-dependent response associated with a further increase in chromatin decondensation. Global induction of damage with bleocin displays similar trends of chromatin decondensation and increased mobility only at 53BP1-labeled damage sites but not at non-damaged sites, indicating that chromatin dynamics are tightly regulated locally after damage. These results shed light on the evolution of the local and global DNA damage response associated with chromatin remodeling and dynamics, with direct implications for their role in repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6308236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63082362019-01-04 Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response Whitefield, Daniel B. Spagnol, Stephen T. Armiger, Travis J. Lan, Li Dahl, Kris Noel Sci Rep Article DNA double-strand breaks pose a direct threat to genomic stability. Studies of DNA damage and chromatin dynamics have yielded opposing results that support either increased or decreased chromatin motion after damage. In this study, we independently measure the dynamics of transcriptionally active or repressed chromatin regions using particle tracking microrheology. We find that the baseline motion of transcriptionally repressed regions of chromatin are significantly less mobile than transcriptionally active chromatin, which is statistically similar to the bulk motion of chromatin within the nucleus. Site specific DNA damage using KillerRed tags induced in loci within repressed chromatin causes an increased motion, while loci within transcriptionally active regions remains unchanged at similar time scales. We also observe a time-dependent response associated with a further increase in chromatin decondensation. Global induction of damage with bleocin displays similar trends of chromatin decondensation and increased mobility only at 53BP1-labeled damage sites but not at non-damaged sites, indicating that chromatin dynamics are tightly regulated locally after damage. These results shed light on the evolution of the local and global DNA damage response associated with chromatin remodeling and dynamics, with direct implications for their role in repair. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6308236/ /pubmed/30591710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36343-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Whitefield, Daniel B. Spagnol, Stephen T. Armiger, Travis J. Lan, Li Dahl, Kris Noel Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response |
title | Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response |
title_full | Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response |
title_fullStr | Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response |
title_short | Quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and DNA damage response |
title_sort | quantifying site-specific chromatin mechanics and dna damage response |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30591710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36343-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitefielddanielb quantifyingsitespecificchromatinmechanicsanddnadamageresponse AT spagnolstephent quantifyingsitespecificchromatinmechanicsanddnadamageresponse AT armigertravisj quantifyingsitespecificchromatinmechanicsanddnadamageresponse AT lanli quantifyingsitespecificchromatinmechanicsanddnadamageresponse AT dahlkrisnoel quantifyingsitespecificchromatinmechanicsanddnadamageresponse |