Cargando…
A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124428 |
_version_ | 1783383252192460800 |
---|---|
author | Liao, Qixiang Sheng, Zheng Shi, Hanqing Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lesong Ge, Wei Long, Zhiyong |
author_facet | Liao, Qixiang Sheng, Zheng Shi, Hanqing Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lesong Ge, Wei Long, Zhiyong |
author_sort | Liao, Qixiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance ([Formula: see text]). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6308707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63087072019-01-04 A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct Liao, Qixiang Sheng, Zheng Shi, Hanqing Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lesong Ge, Wei Long, Zhiyong Sensors (Basel) Article The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance ([Formula: see text]). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved. MDPI 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6308707/ /pubmed/30558198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124428 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Liao, Qixiang Sheng, Zheng Shi, Hanqing Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lesong Ge, Wei Long, Zhiyong A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
title | A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
title_full | A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
title_short | A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
title_sort | comparative study on evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms estimating surface duct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaoqixiang acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT shengzheng acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT shihanqing acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT zhanglei acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT zhoulesong acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT gewei acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT longzhiyong acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT liaoqixiang comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT shengzheng comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT shihanqing comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT zhanglei comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT zhoulesong comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT gewei comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct AT longzhiyong comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct |