Cargando…

A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct

The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Qixiang, Sheng, Zheng, Shi, Hanqing, Zhang, Lei, Zhou, Lesong, Ge, Wei, Long, Zhiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124428
_version_ 1783383252192460800
author Liao, Qixiang
Sheng, Zheng
Shi, Hanqing
Zhang, Lei
Zhou, Lesong
Ge, Wei
Long, Zhiyong
author_facet Liao, Qixiang
Sheng, Zheng
Shi, Hanqing
Zhang, Lei
Zhou, Lesong
Ge, Wei
Long, Zhiyong
author_sort Liao, Qixiang
collection PubMed
description The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance ([Formula: see text]). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63087072019-01-04 A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct Liao, Qixiang Sheng, Zheng Shi, Hanqing Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lesong Ge, Wei Long, Zhiyong Sensors (Basel) Article The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance ([Formula: see text]). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved. MDPI 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6308707/ /pubmed/30558198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124428 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liao, Qixiang
Sheng, Zheng
Shi, Hanqing
Zhang, Lei
Zhou, Lesong
Ge, Wei
Long, Zhiyong
A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
title A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
title_full A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
title_short A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
title_sort comparative study on evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms estimating surface duct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18124428
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoqixiang acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT shengzheng acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT shihanqing acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT zhanglei acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT zhoulesong acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT gewei acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT longzhiyong acomparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT liaoqixiang comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT shengzheng comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT shihanqing comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT zhanglei comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT zhoulesong comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT gewei comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct
AT longzhiyong comparativestudyonevolutionarymultiobjectiveoptimizationalgorithmsestimatingsurfaceduct