Cargando…
Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spatial and temporal pattern of cortical responses evoked by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM). METHODS: We investigated 7 patients suffering from Essential tremor (ET) and 7 patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.001 |
_version_ | 1783383279654666240 |
---|---|
author | Hartmann, C.J. Hirschmann, J. Vesper, J. Wojtecki, L. Butz, M. Schnitzler, A. |
author_facet | Hartmann, C.J. Hirschmann, J. Vesper, J. Wojtecki, L. Butz, M. Schnitzler, A. |
author_sort | Hartmann, C.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spatial and temporal pattern of cortical responses evoked by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM). METHODS: We investigated 7 patients suffering from Essential tremor (ET) and 7 patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) following the implantation of DBS electrodes (VIM for ET patients, STN for PD patients). Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record cortical responses evoked by electric stimuli that were applied via the DBS electrode in trains of 5 Hz. Dipole fitting was applied to reconstruct the origin of evoked responses. RESULTS: Both VIM and STN DBS led to short latency cortical responses at about 1 ms. The pattern of medium and long latency cortical responses following VIM DBS consisted of peaks at 13, 40, 77, and 116 ms. The associated equivalent dipoles were localized within the central sulcus, 3 patients showed an additional response in the cerebellum at 56 ms. STN DBS evoked cortical responses peaking at 4 ms, 11 ms, and 27 ms, respectively. While most dipoles were localized in the pre- or postcentral gyrus, the distribution was less homogenous compared to VIM stimulation and partially included prefrontal brain areas. CONCLUSION: MEG enables localization of cortical responses evoked by DBS of the VIM and the STN, especially in the sensorimotor cortex. Short latency responses of 1 ms suggest cortical modulation which bypasses synaptic transmission, i.e. antidromic activation of corticofugal fiber pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6308824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63088242018-12-28 Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus Hartmann, C.J. Hirschmann, J. Vesper, J. Wojtecki, L. Butz, M. Schnitzler, A. Neuroimage Clin Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spatial and temporal pattern of cortical responses evoked by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM). METHODS: We investigated 7 patients suffering from Essential tremor (ET) and 7 patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) following the implantation of DBS electrodes (VIM for ET patients, STN for PD patients). Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record cortical responses evoked by electric stimuli that were applied via the DBS electrode in trains of 5 Hz. Dipole fitting was applied to reconstruct the origin of evoked responses. RESULTS: Both VIM and STN DBS led to short latency cortical responses at about 1 ms. The pattern of medium and long latency cortical responses following VIM DBS consisted of peaks at 13, 40, 77, and 116 ms. The associated equivalent dipoles were localized within the central sulcus, 3 patients showed an additional response in the cerebellum at 56 ms. STN DBS evoked cortical responses peaking at 4 ms, 11 ms, and 27 ms, respectively. While most dipoles were localized in the pre- or postcentral gyrus, the distribution was less homogenous compared to VIM stimulation and partially included prefrontal brain areas. CONCLUSION: MEG enables localization of cortical responses evoked by DBS of the VIM and the STN, especially in the sensorimotor cortex. Short latency responses of 1 ms suggest cortical modulation which bypasses synaptic transmission, i.e. antidromic activation of corticofugal fiber pathways. Elsevier 2018-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6308824/ /pubmed/30420259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hartmann, C.J. Hirschmann, J. Vesper, J. Wojtecki, L. Butz, M. Schnitzler, A. Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
title | Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
title_full | Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
title_fullStr | Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
title_short | Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
title_sort | distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartmanncj distinctcorticalresponsesevokedbyelectricalstimulationofthethalamicventralintermediatenucleusandofthesubthalamicnucleus AT hirschmannj distinctcorticalresponsesevokedbyelectricalstimulationofthethalamicventralintermediatenucleusandofthesubthalamicnucleus AT vesperj distinctcorticalresponsesevokedbyelectricalstimulationofthethalamicventralintermediatenucleusandofthesubthalamicnucleus AT wojteckil distinctcorticalresponsesevokedbyelectricalstimulationofthethalamicventralintermediatenucleusandofthesubthalamicnucleus AT butzm distinctcorticalresponsesevokedbyelectricalstimulationofthethalamicventralintermediatenucleusandofthesubthalamicnucleus AT schnitzlera distinctcorticalresponsesevokedbyelectricalstimulationofthethalamicventralintermediatenucleusandofthesubthalamicnucleus |