Cargando…

Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?

Mechanistic approaches for predicting the ranges of endotherms are needed to forecast their responses to environmental change. We test whether physiological constraints on maximum metabolic rate and the factor by which endotherms can elevate their metabolism (metabolic expansibility) influence cold...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckley, Lauren B., Khaliq, Imran, Swanson, David L., Hof, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4537
_version_ 1783383290792640512
author Buckley, Lauren B.
Khaliq, Imran
Swanson, David L.
Hof, Christian
author_facet Buckley, Lauren B.
Khaliq, Imran
Swanson, David L.
Hof, Christian
author_sort Buckley, Lauren B.
collection PubMed
description Mechanistic approaches for predicting the ranges of endotherms are needed to forecast their responses to environmental change. We test whether physiological constraints on maximum metabolic rate and the factor by which endotherms can elevate their metabolism (metabolic expansibility) influence cold range limits for mammal and bird species. We examine metabolic expansibility at the cold range boundary (ME(CRB)) and whether species’ traits can predict variability in ME(CRB) and then use ME(CRB) as an initial approach to project range shifts for 210 mammal and 61 bird species. We find evidence for metabolic constraints: the distributions of metabolic expansibility at the cold range boundary peak at similar values for birds (2.7) and mammals (3.2). The right skewed distributions suggest some species have adapted to elevate or evade metabolic constraints. Mammals exhibit greater skew than birds, consistent with their diverse thermoregulatory adaptations and behaviors. Mammal and bird species that are small and occupy low trophic levels exhibit high levels of ME(CRB). Mammals with high ME(CRB) tend to hibernate or use torpor. Predicted metabolic rates at the cold range boundaries represent large energetic expenditures (>50% of maximum metabolic rates). We project species to shift their cold range boundaries poleward by an average of 3.9° latitude by 2070 if metabolic constraints remain constant. Our analysis suggests that metabolic constraints provide a viable mechanism for initial projections of the cold range boundaries for endotherms. However, errors and approximations in estimating metabolic constraints (e.g., acclimation responses) and evasion of these constraints (e.g., torpor/hibernation, microclimate selection) highlight the need for more detailed, taxa‐specific mechanistic models. Even coarse considerations of metabolism will likely lead to improved predictions over exclusively considering thermal tolerance for endotherms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63088722019-01-07 Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change? Buckley, Lauren B. Khaliq, Imran Swanson, David L. Hof, Christian Ecol Evol Original Research Mechanistic approaches for predicting the ranges of endotherms are needed to forecast their responses to environmental change. We test whether physiological constraints on maximum metabolic rate and the factor by which endotherms can elevate their metabolism (metabolic expansibility) influence cold range limits for mammal and bird species. We examine metabolic expansibility at the cold range boundary (ME(CRB)) and whether species’ traits can predict variability in ME(CRB) and then use ME(CRB) as an initial approach to project range shifts for 210 mammal and 61 bird species. We find evidence for metabolic constraints: the distributions of metabolic expansibility at the cold range boundary peak at similar values for birds (2.7) and mammals (3.2). The right skewed distributions suggest some species have adapted to elevate or evade metabolic constraints. Mammals exhibit greater skew than birds, consistent with their diverse thermoregulatory adaptations and behaviors. Mammal and bird species that are small and occupy low trophic levels exhibit high levels of ME(CRB). Mammals with high ME(CRB) tend to hibernate or use torpor. Predicted metabolic rates at the cold range boundaries represent large energetic expenditures (>50% of maximum metabolic rates). We project species to shift their cold range boundaries poleward by an average of 3.9° latitude by 2070 if metabolic constraints remain constant. Our analysis suggests that metabolic constraints provide a viable mechanism for initial projections of the cold range boundaries for endotherms. However, errors and approximations in estimating metabolic constraints (e.g., acclimation responses) and evasion of these constraints (e.g., torpor/hibernation, microclimate selection) highlight the need for more detailed, taxa‐specific mechanistic models. Even coarse considerations of metabolism will likely lead to improved predictions over exclusively considering thermal tolerance for endotherms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6308872/ /pubmed/30619552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4537 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Buckley, Lauren B.
Khaliq, Imran
Swanson, David L.
Hof, Christian
Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
title Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
title_full Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
title_fullStr Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
title_full_unstemmed Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
title_short Does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
title_sort does metabolism constrain bird and mammal ranges and predict shifts in response to climate change?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4537
work_keys_str_mv AT buckleylaurenb doesmetabolismconstrainbirdandmammalrangesandpredictshiftsinresponsetoclimatechange
AT khaliqimran doesmetabolismconstrainbirdandmammalrangesandpredictshiftsinresponsetoclimatechange
AT swansondavidl doesmetabolismconstrainbirdandmammalrangesandpredictshiftsinresponsetoclimatechange
AT hofchristian doesmetabolismconstrainbirdandmammalrangesandpredictshiftsinresponsetoclimatechange