Cargando…

Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships

Disentangling the origin of species–genetic diversity correlations (SGDCs) is a challenging task that provides insight into the way that neutral and adaptive processes influence diversity at multiple levels. Genetic and species diversity are comprised by components that respond differently to the sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfeiffer, Vera Wilder, Ford, Brett Michael, Housset, Johann, McCombs, Audrey, Blanco‐Pastor, José Luis, Gouin, Nicolas, Manel, Stéphanie, Bertin, Angéline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4530
_version_ 1783383293855531008
author Pfeiffer, Vera Wilder
Ford, Brett Michael
Housset, Johann
McCombs, Audrey
Blanco‐Pastor, José Luis
Gouin, Nicolas
Manel, Stéphanie
Bertin, Angéline
author_facet Pfeiffer, Vera Wilder
Ford, Brett Michael
Housset, Johann
McCombs, Audrey
Blanco‐Pastor, José Luis
Gouin, Nicolas
Manel, Stéphanie
Bertin, Angéline
author_sort Pfeiffer, Vera Wilder
collection PubMed
description Disentangling the origin of species–genetic diversity correlations (SGDCs) is a challenging task that provides insight into the way that neutral and adaptive processes influence diversity at multiple levels. Genetic and species diversity are comprised by components that respond differently to the same ecological processes. Thus, it can be useful to partition species and genetic diversity into their different components to infer the mechanisms behind SGDCs. In this study, we applied such an approach using a high‐elevation Andean wetland system, where previous evidence identified neutral processes as major determinants of the strong and positive covariation between plant species richness and AFLP genetic diversity of the common sedge Carex gayana. To tease apart putative neutral and non‐neutral genetic variation of C. gayana, we identified loci putatively under selection from a dataset of 1,709 SNPs produced using restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing (RAD‐seq). Significant and positive relationships between local estimates of genetic and species diversities (α‐SGDCs) were only found with the putatively neutral loci datasets and with species richness, confirming that neutral processes were primarily driving the correlations and that the involved processes differentially influenced local species diversity components (i.e., richness and evenness). In contrast, SGDCs based on genetic and community dissimilarities (β‐SGDCs) were only significant with the putative non‐neutral datasets. This suggests that selective processes influencing C. gayana genetic diversity were involved in the detected correlations. Together, our results demonstrate that analyzing distinct components of genetic and species diversity simultaneously is useful to determine the mechanisms behind species–genetic diversity relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6308885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63088852019-01-07 Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships Pfeiffer, Vera Wilder Ford, Brett Michael Housset, Johann McCombs, Audrey Blanco‐Pastor, José Luis Gouin, Nicolas Manel, Stéphanie Bertin, Angéline Ecol Evol Original Research Disentangling the origin of species–genetic diversity correlations (SGDCs) is a challenging task that provides insight into the way that neutral and adaptive processes influence diversity at multiple levels. Genetic and species diversity are comprised by components that respond differently to the same ecological processes. Thus, it can be useful to partition species and genetic diversity into their different components to infer the mechanisms behind SGDCs. In this study, we applied such an approach using a high‐elevation Andean wetland system, where previous evidence identified neutral processes as major determinants of the strong and positive covariation between plant species richness and AFLP genetic diversity of the common sedge Carex gayana. To tease apart putative neutral and non‐neutral genetic variation of C. gayana, we identified loci putatively under selection from a dataset of 1,709 SNPs produced using restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing (RAD‐seq). Significant and positive relationships between local estimates of genetic and species diversities (α‐SGDCs) were only found with the putatively neutral loci datasets and with species richness, confirming that neutral processes were primarily driving the correlations and that the involved processes differentially influenced local species diversity components (i.e., richness and evenness). In contrast, SGDCs based on genetic and community dissimilarities (β‐SGDCs) were only significant with the putative non‐neutral datasets. This suggests that selective processes influencing C. gayana genetic diversity were involved in the detected correlations. Together, our results demonstrate that analyzing distinct components of genetic and species diversity simultaneously is useful to determine the mechanisms behind species–genetic diversity relationships. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6308885/ /pubmed/30619550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4530 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pfeiffer, Vera Wilder
Ford, Brett Michael
Housset, Johann
McCombs, Audrey
Blanco‐Pastor, José Luis
Gouin, Nicolas
Manel, Stéphanie
Bertin, Angéline
Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
title Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
title_full Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
title_fullStr Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
title_full_unstemmed Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
title_short Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
title_sort partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species–genetic diversity relationships
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4530
work_keys_str_mv AT pfeifferverawilder partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT fordbrettmichael partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT houssetjohann partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT mccombsaudrey partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT blancopastorjoseluis partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT gouinnicolas partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT manelstephanie partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships
AT bertinangeline partitioninggeneticandspeciesdiversityrefinesourunderstandingofspeciesgeneticdiversityrelationships