Cargando…

A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics

BACKGROUND: Fingerprints studied by dermatoglyphics are unique for a given individual. It depends on the genetic makeup of an individual. Hypertension, a harbinger of many complications, is determined by genetic and environmental factors. In this observational study, we tried to find an association...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chakravathy P., Ganesh, Shirali, Arun, Chowta, K. Nithyananda, Ramapuram, John T., Madi, Deepak, Raj Singh Chouhan, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6309295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.07.007
_version_ 1783383361876656128
author Chakravathy P., Ganesh
Shirali, Arun
Chowta, K. Nithyananda
Ramapuram, John T.
Madi, Deepak
Raj Singh Chouhan, Ravi
author_facet Chakravathy P., Ganesh
Shirali, Arun
Chowta, K. Nithyananda
Ramapuram, John T.
Madi, Deepak
Raj Singh Chouhan, Ravi
author_sort Chakravathy P., Ganesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fingerprints studied by dermatoglyphics are unique for a given individual. It depends on the genetic makeup of an individual. Hypertension, a harbinger of many complications, is determined by genetic and environmental factors. In this observational study, we tried to find an association of palmar dermatoglyphic parameters and hypertension. METHOD: Two hundred fifty known hypertensives as cases and 250 normotensives as controls were enrolled after considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Dermatoglyphic patterns on tips of fingers obtained by digital imaging were noted in both the groups, and “atd” angle was calculated using “screen protractor” software. Collected data were statistically analyzed to find any association between dermatoglyphic qualitative and dermatoglyphic quantitative patterns and hypertension. RESULT: Mean “atd” angle was higher in cases than in controls. Comparison of dermatoglyphic patterns in both the groups in various ways—both hands together, the right hand and left hand separately, similar fingers on right and left hand together, and similar fingers separately—was performed which revealed that at every level, whorls were more frequent in cases than in controls and that distribution of dermatoglyphic patterns were statistically significant in cases than in controls. CONCLUSION: Fingerprint patterns can be reliably used to identify individuals likely at risk for hypertension, and accordingly, preventive measures can be targeted. This subject area demands a need for further research and analysis with large sample size to allow dermatoglyphics to evolve into a cost-effective and handy tool for identifying individuals at risk of hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6309295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63092952019-12-01 A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics Chakravathy P., Ganesh Shirali, Arun Chowta, K. Nithyananda Ramapuram, John T. Madi, Deepak Raj Singh Chouhan, Ravi Indian Heart J Clinical and Preventive Cardiology BACKGROUND: Fingerprints studied by dermatoglyphics are unique for a given individual. It depends on the genetic makeup of an individual. Hypertension, a harbinger of many complications, is determined by genetic and environmental factors. In this observational study, we tried to find an association of palmar dermatoglyphic parameters and hypertension. METHOD: Two hundred fifty known hypertensives as cases and 250 normotensives as controls were enrolled after considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Dermatoglyphic patterns on tips of fingers obtained by digital imaging were noted in both the groups, and “atd” angle was calculated using “screen protractor” software. Collected data were statistically analyzed to find any association between dermatoglyphic qualitative and dermatoglyphic quantitative patterns and hypertension. RESULT: Mean “atd” angle was higher in cases than in controls. Comparison of dermatoglyphic patterns in both the groups in various ways—both hands together, the right hand and left hand separately, similar fingers on right and left hand together, and similar fingers separately—was performed which revealed that at every level, whorls were more frequent in cases than in controls and that distribution of dermatoglyphic patterns were statistically significant in cases than in controls. CONCLUSION: Fingerprint patterns can be reliably used to identify individuals likely at risk for hypertension, and accordingly, preventive measures can be targeted. This subject area demands a need for further research and analysis with large sample size to allow dermatoglyphics to evolve into a cost-effective and handy tool for identifying individuals at risk of hypertension. Elsevier 2018-12 2018-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6309295/ /pubmed/30595242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.07.007 Text en © 2018 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical and Preventive Cardiology
Chakravathy P., Ganesh
Shirali, Arun
Chowta, K. Nithyananda
Ramapuram, John T.
Madi, Deepak
Raj Singh Chouhan, Ravi
A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics
title A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics
title_full A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics
title_fullStr A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics
title_full_unstemmed A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics
title_short A “Handy” tool for hypertension prediction: Dermatoglyphics
title_sort “handy” tool for hypertension prediction: dermatoglyphics
topic Clinical and Preventive Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6309295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.07.007
work_keys_str_mv AT chakravathypganesh ahandytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT shiraliarun ahandytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT chowtaknithyananda ahandytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT ramapuramjohnt ahandytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT madideepak ahandytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT rajsinghchouhanravi ahandytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT chakravathypganesh handytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT shiraliarun handytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT chowtaknithyananda handytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT ramapuramjohnt handytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT madideepak handytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics
AT rajsinghchouhanravi handytoolforhypertensionpredictiondermatoglyphics