Cargando…

Magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging fusion for live guidance of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, two-dimensional (2D) angiography was the mainstay of guidance for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). Recent advances in fusion software have enabled direct fusion of pre-intervention imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Góreczny, Sebastian, Dryżek, Paweł, Moszura1, Tomasz, Łukaszewski, Maciej, Podgórski, Michał, Nordmeyer, Sarah, Kuehne, Titus, Berger, Felix, Schubert, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6309845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603031
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.79871
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Until recently, two-dimensional (2D) angiography was the mainstay of guidance for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). Recent advances in fusion software have enabled direct fusion of pre-intervention imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans, to create a reliable three-dimensional (3D) roadmap for procedural guidance. AIM: To report initial two-center experience with direct 2D–3D image fusion for live guidance of PPVI with MRI- and CT-derived 3D roadmaps. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study on PPVIs guided with the new fusion imaging platform introduced in the last quarter of 2015. RESULTS: 3D guidance with an MRI- (n = 14) or CT- (n = 8) derived roadmap was utilized during 22 catheterizations for right ventricular outflow tract balloon sizing (n = 7) or PPVI (n = 15). Successful 2D–3D registration was performed in all but 1 patient. Six (27%) patients required intra-procedural readjustment of the 3D roadmap due to distortion of the anatomy after introduction of a stiff wire. Twenty-one (95%) interventions were successful in the application of 3D imaging. Patients in the CT group received less contrast volume and had a shorter procedural time, though the differences were not statistically significant. Those in the MRI group had significantly lower weight adjusted radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: With intuitive segmentation and direct 2D–3D fusion of MRI or CT datasets, VesselNavigator facilitates PPVI. Our initial data show that utilization of CT-derived roadmaps may lead to less contrast exposure and shorter procedural time, whereas application of MRI datasets may lead to lower radiation exposure.