Cargando…

The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a non-invasive method that has been used in the diagnosis of several diseases. Recently, CEUS has been used in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. However, the performance of CEUS in thyroid nodules has not been studied clea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Qinghua, Cheng, Jian, Li, Jingjing, Gao, Xiang, Li, Hongbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013325
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a non-invasive method that has been used in the diagnosis of several diseases. Recently, CEUS has been used in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. However, the performance of CEUS in thyroid nodules has not been studied clearly. METHODS: The databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library and the unpublished studies were systematically searched for candidate inclusions, with the use of CEUS in differentiating the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The quality of included studies was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) questionnaire. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated using STATA software version 14.0. RESULTS: Totally 33 diagnostic studies were included for further analysis. The quality of included studies was relatively high using QUADAS method. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 (95% CI 0.85, 0.91) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83, 0.91), respectively. In addition, the DOR, the positive and NLRs were pooled positive LR and the negative LR were 54 (95% CI 33, 89), 7.1% (5.2%, 9.8%), and 0.13% (0.10%, 0.18%). No significant publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis further indicated that CEUS is a useful tool in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules, with high sensitivity and specificity.