Cargando…

Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemostatic effect of hematostatic agent Surgiflo and absorbable gelatin sponge (AGS) in posterior lumbar surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 cases were recruited during August 2016 and June 2017 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly allocated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Litai, Dai, Lijuan, Yang, Yi, Liu, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013511
_version_ 1783383467424219136
author Ma, Litai
Dai, Lijuan
Yang, Yi
Liu, Hao
author_facet Ma, Litai
Dai, Lijuan
Yang, Yi
Liu, Hao
author_sort Ma, Litai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemostatic effect of hematostatic agent Surgiflo and absorbable gelatin sponge (AGS) in posterior lumbar surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 cases were recruited during August 2016 and June 2017 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly allocated to the Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix (SHM) group or the AGS group (AGS) by computer-generated randomization codes. The success rates of hemostasis for 3 minutes and 5 minutes, the time of operation, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the volume of autogenously blood transfusion, the amount of blood during hemostasis, the amount of blood transfusion, and BP, RBC, HCT, HB of preoperative, 2 to 3 days, and 5 to 7 days following operation were recorded to compare. Daily drainage and all adverse events after operation were also compared. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up for at least 1 month. The RBC and HCT of the AGS group before operation were lower than those in the control group (P = .039, P = .029), but there was no difference after operation (P >.05). In the control group, 19 cases were successfully hemostatic in 3 minutes, 4 cases were successful in 5 minutes, and 7 cases were combined with hemostasis. In the SHM group, it was 22, 3, and 5 cases respectively. There was significant difference in blood loss during hemostatic process between the 2 groups (P <.001). There was no difference in the amount of blood loss and autologous blood transfusion between the 2 groups, and there was no difference in the operation time between the 2 groups. In the AGS group, allogeneic blood was infused in 1 case during operation, and no allogeneic blood was infused in the other patients. The drainage volume on the 1st day and the 2nd to 4th day after operation in the AGS group was less than that in the control group (P = .015, P = .010). CONCLUSION: Compared with AGS, SHM could decrease the blood loss during hemostatic process and the postoperative drainage volume in posterior operation of lumbar degenerative disease. SHM is a safe and effective hemostatic agent in lumbar posterior surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6310587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63105872019-01-14 Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study Ma, Litai Dai, Lijuan Yang, Yi Liu, Hao Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemostatic effect of hematostatic agent Surgiflo and absorbable gelatin sponge (AGS) in posterior lumbar surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 cases were recruited during August 2016 and June 2017 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly allocated to the Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix (SHM) group or the AGS group (AGS) by computer-generated randomization codes. The success rates of hemostasis for 3 minutes and 5 minutes, the time of operation, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the volume of autogenously blood transfusion, the amount of blood during hemostasis, the amount of blood transfusion, and BP, RBC, HCT, HB of preoperative, 2 to 3 days, and 5 to 7 days following operation were recorded to compare. Daily drainage and all adverse events after operation were also compared. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up for at least 1 month. The RBC and HCT of the AGS group before operation were lower than those in the control group (P = .039, P = .029), but there was no difference after operation (P >.05). In the control group, 19 cases were successfully hemostatic in 3 minutes, 4 cases were successful in 5 minutes, and 7 cases were combined with hemostasis. In the SHM group, it was 22, 3, and 5 cases respectively. There was significant difference in blood loss during hemostatic process between the 2 groups (P <.001). There was no difference in the amount of blood loss and autologous blood transfusion between the 2 groups, and there was no difference in the operation time between the 2 groups. In the AGS group, allogeneic blood was infused in 1 case during operation, and no allogeneic blood was infused in the other patients. The drainage volume on the 1st day and the 2nd to 4th day after operation in the AGS group was less than that in the control group (P = .015, P = .010). CONCLUSION: Compared with AGS, SHM could decrease the blood loss during hemostatic process and the postoperative drainage volume in posterior operation of lumbar degenerative disease. SHM is a safe and effective hemostatic agent in lumbar posterior surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6310587/ /pubmed/30544449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013511 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Litai
Dai, Lijuan
Yang, Yi
Liu, Hao
Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study
title Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study
title_full Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study
title_short Comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of Surgiflo Haemostatic Matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: A randomized controlled study
title_sort comparison the efficacy of hemorrhage control of surgiflo haemostatic matrix and absorbable gelatin sponge in posterior lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013511
work_keys_str_mv AT malitai comparisontheefficacyofhemorrhagecontrolofsurgiflohaemostaticmatrixandabsorbablegelatinspongeinposteriorlumbarsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dailijuan comparisontheefficacyofhemorrhagecontrolofsurgiflohaemostaticmatrixandabsorbablegelatinspongeinposteriorlumbarsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yangyi comparisontheefficacyofhemorrhagecontrolofsurgiflohaemostaticmatrixandabsorbablegelatinspongeinposteriorlumbarsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT liuhao comparisontheefficacyofhemorrhagecontrolofsurgiflohaemostaticmatrixandabsorbablegelatinspongeinposteriorlumbarsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledstudy