Cargando…

Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study

BACKGROUND: Occupational radiation exposureis a growing problem due to increasing number and complexity of interventional procedures.The RADPAD is a lead-free sterile drape containing bismuth and barium that reduces scatter radiation during fluoroscopic procedures. We aimed to study the radiation ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Pujan, Khanna, Roopali, Kapoor, Aditya, Goel, Pravin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.03.008
_version_ 1783383475642957824
author Shah, Pujan
Khanna, Roopali
Kapoor, Aditya
Goel, Pravin K.
author_facet Shah, Pujan
Khanna, Roopali
Kapoor, Aditya
Goel, Pravin K.
author_sort Shah, Pujan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occupational radiation exposureis a growing problem due to increasing number and complexity of interventional procedures.The RADPAD is a lead-free sterile drape containing bismuth and barium that reduces scatter radiation during fluoroscopic procedures. We aimed to study the radiation exposure reduction to operators with the use of RADPAD and also measureradiation doses in different angiographic projections. METHODS: 65 randomly selected patients undergoing elective complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures from January 2017 to 2017 were randomized in a 1:1 pattern with or without the RADPAD. Primary endpoint was the ratio of operator received dose in mrem to total radiation in Gyat the end of the procedure which was designated ‘’Relative operator exposure’’, with or without RADPAD. RESULTS: Despite similar fluoroscopy times (20.4 ± 9.4 min with RADPAD vs. 19.4 ± 9.2 min without RADPAD, P = 0.871) and total radiation dose (3.4 ± 4.3 Gy with RADPAD vs. 2.3 ± 1.4 Gy, P = 0.198), the relative operator exposure was significantly less with RADPAD (1.39 ± 0.95) as compared to no RADPAD group (2.27 ± 1.4) (p = 0.004) amounting to a 39% reduction. Additionally mean radiation dose per shoot of recorded Left anterior oblique (LAO) oriented projections was 34.4 ± 15.7mGyvs 24.9 ± 12.9 mGy for a non LAO oriented projection. (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RADPAD significantly reduces radiation exposure to the primary operator during prolonged complex PCI procedures. Further, amongst all views, LAO views have significantly higher emitted radiation as compared to Non LAO views and need more radiation protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6310698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63106982019-12-01 Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study Shah, Pujan Khanna, Roopali Kapoor, Aditya Goel, Pravin K. Indian Heart J Interventional Cardiology BACKGROUND: Occupational radiation exposureis a growing problem due to increasing number and complexity of interventional procedures.The RADPAD is a lead-free sterile drape containing bismuth and barium that reduces scatter radiation during fluoroscopic procedures. We aimed to study the radiation exposure reduction to operators with the use of RADPAD and also measureradiation doses in different angiographic projections. METHODS: 65 randomly selected patients undergoing elective complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures from January 2017 to 2017 were randomized in a 1:1 pattern with or without the RADPAD. Primary endpoint was the ratio of operator received dose in mrem to total radiation in Gyat the end of the procedure which was designated ‘’Relative operator exposure’’, with or without RADPAD. RESULTS: Despite similar fluoroscopy times (20.4 ± 9.4 min with RADPAD vs. 19.4 ± 9.2 min without RADPAD, P = 0.871) and total radiation dose (3.4 ± 4.3 Gy with RADPAD vs. 2.3 ± 1.4 Gy, P = 0.198), the relative operator exposure was significantly less with RADPAD (1.39 ± 0.95) as compared to no RADPAD group (2.27 ± 1.4) (p = 0.004) amounting to a 39% reduction. Additionally mean radiation dose per shoot of recorded Left anterior oblique (LAO) oriented projections was 34.4 ± 15.7mGyvs 24.9 ± 12.9 mGy for a non LAO oriented projection. (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RADPAD significantly reduces radiation exposure to the primary operator during prolonged complex PCI procedures. Further, amongst all views, LAO views have significantly higher emitted radiation as compared to Non LAO views and need more radiation protection. Elsevier 2018-12 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6310698/ /pubmed/30595271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.03.008 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
Shah, Pujan
Khanna, Roopali
Kapoor, Aditya
Goel, Pravin K.
Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study
title Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study
title_full Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study
title_fullStr Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study
title_short Efficacy of RADPAD protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—First Indian study
title_sort efficacy of radpad protection drape in reducing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory—first indian study
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.03.008
work_keys_str_mv AT shahpujan efficacyofradpadprotectiondrapeinreducingradiationexposureinthecatheterizationlaboratoryfirstindianstudy
AT khannaroopali efficacyofradpadprotectiondrapeinreducingradiationexposureinthecatheterizationlaboratoryfirstindianstudy
AT kapooraditya efficacyofradpadprotectiondrapeinreducingradiationexposureinthecatheterizationlaboratoryfirstindianstudy
AT goelpravink efficacyofradpadprotectiondrapeinreducingradiationexposureinthecatheterizationlaboratoryfirstindianstudy