Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Eun Young, Youn, Inyoung, Lee, Kwan Ho, Yun, Ji-Sup, Park, Yong Lai, Park, Chan Heun, Moon, Juhee, Choi, Seon Hyeong, Choi, Yoon Jung, Ham, Soo-Youn, Kook, Shin Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607168
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62
_version_ 1783383481285345280
author Kim, Eun Young
Youn, Inyoung
Lee, Kwan Ho
Yun, Ji-Sup
Park, Yong Lai
Park, Chan Heun
Moon, Juhee
Choi, Seon Hyeong
Choi, Yoon Jung
Ham, Soo-Youn
Kook, Shin Ho
author_facet Kim, Eun Young
Youn, Inyoung
Lee, Kwan Ho
Yun, Ji-Sup
Park, Yong Lai
Park, Chan Heun
Moon, Juhee
Choi, Seon Hyeong
Choi, Yoon Jung
Ham, Soo-Youn
Kook, Shin Ho
author_sort Kim, Eun Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2016 to October 2017, 84 patients who were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (69/84) and ductal carcinoma in situ (15/84), and underwent both CEDM and CEMRI, were enrolled. Imaging findings and surgical management were correlated with pathological results and compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities in the detection of index and secondary cancers (multifocality and multicentricity), and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, was compared. The authors also evaluated whether CEDM or CEMRI resulted in changes in the surgical management of the affected breast due to imaging-detected findings. RESULTS: Eighty-four women were included in the analysis. Compared with CEMRI, CEDM demonstrated a similar sensitivity (92.9% [78/84] vs. 95.2% [80/84]) in detecting index cancer (p=0.563). For the detection of secondary cancers in the ipsilateral breast and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (p=0.999 and p=0.999, respectively). Regarding changes in surgical management, CEDM resulted in similar changes compared with CEMRI (30.9% [26/84] vs. 29.7% [25/84], p=0.610). Regarding changes in surgical management due to false-positive findings, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (34.6% [9/26] vs. 44.0% [11/25], p=0.782). CONCLUSION: CEDM demonstrated a diagnostic performance comparable with CEMRI in depicting index cancers, secondary cancers, and occult cancer in the contralateral breast. CEDM demonstrated similar changes in surgical management compared with CEMRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6310721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63107212019-01-03 Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Kim, Eun Young Youn, Inyoung Lee, Kwan Ho Yun, Ji-Sup Park, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Moon, Juhee Choi, Seon Hyeong Choi, Yoon Jung Ham, Soo-Youn Kook, Shin Ho J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2016 to October 2017, 84 patients who were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (69/84) and ductal carcinoma in situ (15/84), and underwent both CEDM and CEMRI, were enrolled. Imaging findings and surgical management were correlated with pathological results and compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities in the detection of index and secondary cancers (multifocality and multicentricity), and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, was compared. The authors also evaluated whether CEDM or CEMRI resulted in changes in the surgical management of the affected breast due to imaging-detected findings. RESULTS: Eighty-four women were included in the analysis. Compared with CEMRI, CEDM demonstrated a similar sensitivity (92.9% [78/84] vs. 95.2% [80/84]) in detecting index cancer (p=0.563). For the detection of secondary cancers in the ipsilateral breast and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (p=0.999 and p=0.999, respectively). Regarding changes in surgical management, CEDM resulted in similar changes compared with CEMRI (30.9% [26/84] vs. 29.7% [25/84], p=0.610). Regarding changes in surgical management due to false-positive findings, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (34.6% [9/26] vs. 44.0% [11/25], p=0.782). CONCLUSION: CEDM demonstrated a diagnostic performance comparable with CEMRI in depicting index cancers, secondary cancers, and occult cancer in the contralateral breast. CEDM demonstrated similar changes in surgical management compared with CEMRI. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2018-12 2018-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6310721/ /pubmed/30607168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62 Text en © 2018 Korean Breast Cancer Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Eun Young
Youn, Inyoung
Lee, Kwan Ho
Yun, Ji-Sup
Park, Yong Lai
Park, Chan Heun
Moon, Juhee
Choi, Seon Hyeong
Choi, Yoon Jung
Ham, Soo-Youn
Kook, Shin Ho
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
title Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
title_full Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
title_short Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
title_sort diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607168
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62
work_keys_str_mv AT kimeunyoung diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT youninyoung diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT leekwanho diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT yunjisup diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT parkyonglai diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT parkchanheun diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT moonjuhee diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT choiseonhyeong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT choiyoonjung diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT hamsooyoun diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer
AT kookshinho diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer