Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Breast Cancer Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62 |
_version_ | 1783383481285345280 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Eun Young Youn, Inyoung Lee, Kwan Ho Yun, Ji-Sup Park, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Moon, Juhee Choi, Seon Hyeong Choi, Yoon Jung Ham, Soo-Youn Kook, Shin Ho |
author_facet | Kim, Eun Young Youn, Inyoung Lee, Kwan Ho Yun, Ji-Sup Park, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Moon, Juhee Choi, Seon Hyeong Choi, Yoon Jung Ham, Soo-Youn Kook, Shin Ho |
author_sort | Kim, Eun Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2016 to October 2017, 84 patients who were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (69/84) and ductal carcinoma in situ (15/84), and underwent both CEDM and CEMRI, were enrolled. Imaging findings and surgical management were correlated with pathological results and compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities in the detection of index and secondary cancers (multifocality and multicentricity), and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, was compared. The authors also evaluated whether CEDM or CEMRI resulted in changes in the surgical management of the affected breast due to imaging-detected findings. RESULTS: Eighty-four women were included in the analysis. Compared with CEMRI, CEDM demonstrated a similar sensitivity (92.9% [78/84] vs. 95.2% [80/84]) in detecting index cancer (p=0.563). For the detection of secondary cancers in the ipsilateral breast and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (p=0.999 and p=0.999, respectively). Regarding changes in surgical management, CEDM resulted in similar changes compared with CEMRI (30.9% [26/84] vs. 29.7% [25/84], p=0.610). Regarding changes in surgical management due to false-positive findings, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (34.6% [9/26] vs. 44.0% [11/25], p=0.782). CONCLUSION: CEDM demonstrated a diagnostic performance comparable with CEMRI in depicting index cancers, secondary cancers, and occult cancer in the contralateral breast. CEDM demonstrated similar changes in surgical management compared with CEMRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6310721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Breast Cancer Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63107212019-01-03 Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Kim, Eun Young Youn, Inyoung Lee, Kwan Ho Yun, Ji-Sup Park, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Moon, Juhee Choi, Seon Hyeong Choi, Yoon Jung Ham, Soo-Youn Kook, Shin Ho J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2016 to October 2017, 84 patients who were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (69/84) and ductal carcinoma in situ (15/84), and underwent both CEDM and CEMRI, were enrolled. Imaging findings and surgical management were correlated with pathological results and compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities in the detection of index and secondary cancers (multifocality and multicentricity), and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, was compared. The authors also evaluated whether CEDM or CEMRI resulted in changes in the surgical management of the affected breast due to imaging-detected findings. RESULTS: Eighty-four women were included in the analysis. Compared with CEMRI, CEDM demonstrated a similar sensitivity (92.9% [78/84] vs. 95.2% [80/84]) in detecting index cancer (p=0.563). For the detection of secondary cancers in the ipsilateral breast and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (p=0.999 and p=0.999, respectively). Regarding changes in surgical management, CEDM resulted in similar changes compared with CEMRI (30.9% [26/84] vs. 29.7% [25/84], p=0.610). Regarding changes in surgical management due to false-positive findings, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (34.6% [9/26] vs. 44.0% [11/25], p=0.782). CONCLUSION: CEDM demonstrated a diagnostic performance comparable with CEMRI in depicting index cancers, secondary cancers, and occult cancer in the contralateral breast. CEDM demonstrated similar changes in surgical management compared with CEMRI. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2018-12 2018-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6310721/ /pubmed/30607168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62 Text en © 2018 Korean Breast Cancer Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Eun Young Youn, Inyoung Lee, Kwan Ho Yun, Ji-Sup Park, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Moon, Juhee Choi, Seon Hyeong Choi, Yoon Jung Ham, Soo-Youn Kook, Shin Ho Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer |
title | Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer |
title_sort | diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607168 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimeunyoung diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT youninyoung diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT leekwanho diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT yunjisup diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT parkyonglai diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT parkchanheun diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT moonjuhee diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT choiseonhyeong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT choiyoonjung diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT hamsooyoun diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer AT kookshinho diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhanceddigitalmammographyversuscontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthepreoperativeevaluationofbreastcancer |