Cargando…
Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease()
BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe whether updated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-targets in patients with manifest coronary artery disease (CAD) led to a change in lipid profile over time. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with manifest CAD from 2009–2010, 2012–2013, and 2015–2016 (n = 500...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.12.004 |
_version_ | 1783383486168563712 |
---|---|
author | Dykun, Iryna Wiefhoff, Daniela Totzeck, Matthias Al-Rashid, Fadi Jánosi, R. Alexander Rassaf, Tienush Mahabadi, Amir A. |
author_facet | Dykun, Iryna Wiefhoff, Daniela Totzeck, Matthias Al-Rashid, Fadi Jánosi, R. Alexander Rassaf, Tienush Mahabadi, Amir A. |
author_sort | Dykun, Iryna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe whether updated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-targets in patients with manifest coronary artery disease (CAD) led to a change in lipid profile over time. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with manifest CAD from 2009–2010, 2012–2013, and 2015–2016 (n = 500 each). Lipid levels and medication at the different time-points as well as rate of accordance to guidelines (<100 for 2009–2010, <70 mg/dl for 2012–2013 and 2015–2016) were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 1500 subjects (mean age: 68.4 ± 11.2 years, 75.8% male) from 813 attending primary care physicians were included. Mean LDL-level was 98.0 ± 35.7 mg/dl, whereas 34.1% reached LDL-targets according to guidelines as applied at each time-point. Reduction of LDL-goals in 2011 lead to an initial decrease in LDL from 98.3 ± 33.4 mg/dl in 2009–2010 to 93.9 ± 36.3 mg/dl in 2012–2013 (p = 0.045). This effect was no longer present in 2015–2016 (101.6 ± 36.6 mg/dl, p = 0.17). The rate of patients meeting recommended LDL-targets decreased over time (2009–2010: 56.6%, 2012–2013: 25.4%, 2015–2016: 20.2%, p < 0.0001 for trend). Likewise, the frequency of statin-intake decreased over time (93.6% in 2009–2010 to 83.7% in 2015-2016, p < 0.0001). While use of medium intensity statins was most frequent (69.4%), only 20.9% of patients with medium intensity statins reached LDL-targets according to guidelines. CONCLUSION: In a large clinical cohort of patients with known coronary artery disease, reduction of LDL-targets in ESC-guidelines in 2011 led to an initial decline in LDL-levels, while this effect was attenuated over time with the majority of patients missing treatment goals. Higher acceptance and compliance of statin therapy is warranted to utilize its effect in secondary prevention in CAD-patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6310742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63107422019-01-02 Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() Dykun, Iryna Wiefhoff, Daniela Totzeck, Matthias Al-Rashid, Fadi Jánosi, R. Alexander Rassaf, Tienush Mahabadi, Amir A. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe whether updated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-targets in patients with manifest coronary artery disease (CAD) led to a change in lipid profile over time. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with manifest CAD from 2009–2010, 2012–2013, and 2015–2016 (n = 500 each). Lipid levels and medication at the different time-points as well as rate of accordance to guidelines (<100 for 2009–2010, <70 mg/dl for 2012–2013 and 2015–2016) were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 1500 subjects (mean age: 68.4 ± 11.2 years, 75.8% male) from 813 attending primary care physicians were included. Mean LDL-level was 98.0 ± 35.7 mg/dl, whereas 34.1% reached LDL-targets according to guidelines as applied at each time-point. Reduction of LDL-goals in 2011 lead to an initial decrease in LDL from 98.3 ± 33.4 mg/dl in 2009–2010 to 93.9 ± 36.3 mg/dl in 2012–2013 (p = 0.045). This effect was no longer present in 2015–2016 (101.6 ± 36.6 mg/dl, p = 0.17). The rate of patients meeting recommended LDL-targets decreased over time (2009–2010: 56.6%, 2012–2013: 25.4%, 2015–2016: 20.2%, p < 0.0001 for trend). Likewise, the frequency of statin-intake decreased over time (93.6% in 2009–2010 to 83.7% in 2015-2016, p < 0.0001). While use of medium intensity statins was most frequent (69.4%), only 20.9% of patients with medium intensity statins reached LDL-targets according to guidelines. CONCLUSION: In a large clinical cohort of patients with known coronary artery disease, reduction of LDL-targets in ESC-guidelines in 2011 led to an initial decline in LDL-levels, while this effect was attenuated over time with the majority of patients missing treatment goals. Higher acceptance and compliance of statin therapy is warranted to utilize its effect in secondary prevention in CAD-patients. Elsevier 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6310742/ /pubmed/30603665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.12.004 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Dykun, Iryna Wiefhoff, Daniela Totzeck, Matthias Al-Rashid, Fadi Jánosi, R. Alexander Rassaf, Tienush Mahabadi, Amir A. Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
title | Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
title_full | Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
title_fullStr | Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
title_full_unstemmed | Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
title_short | Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
title_sort | disconcordance between esc prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease() |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.12.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dykuniryna disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease AT wiefhoffdaniela disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease AT totzeckmatthias disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease AT alrashidfadi disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease AT janosiralexander disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease AT rassaftienush disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease AT mahabadiamira disconcordancebetweenescpreventionguidelinesandobservedlipidprofilesinpatientswithknowncoronaryarterydisease |