Cargando…

Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events

BACKGROUND: Recent infectious disease outbreaks have brought increased attention to the need to strengthen global capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to natural biological threats. However, deliberate biological events also represent a significant global threat, but have received relatively lit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, Rebecca, Graeden, Ellie, Abe, Keishi, Attal-Juncqua, Aurelia, Boyce, Matthew R., Eaneff, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01091
_version_ 1783383492876304384
author Katz, Rebecca
Graeden, Ellie
Abe, Keishi
Attal-Juncqua, Aurelia
Boyce, Matthew R.
Eaneff, Stephanie
author_facet Katz, Rebecca
Graeden, Ellie
Abe, Keishi
Attal-Juncqua, Aurelia
Boyce, Matthew R.
Eaneff, Stephanie
author_sort Katz, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent infectious disease outbreaks have brought increased attention to the need to strengthen global capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to natural biological threats. However, deliberate biological events also represent a significant global threat, but have received relatively little attention. While the Biological Weapons Convention provides a foundation for the response to deliberate biological events, the political mechanisms to respond to and recover from such an event are poorly defined. METHODS: We performed an analysis of the epidemiological timeline, the international policies triggered as a notional deliberate biological event unfolds, and the corresponding stakeholders and mandates assigned by each policy. FINDINGS: The results of this analysis identify a significant gap in both policy and stakeholder mandates: there is no single policy nor stakeholder mandate for leading and coordinating response activities associated with a deliberate biological event. These results were visualized using an open source web-based tool published at https://dbe.talusanalytics.com. INTERPRETATION: While there are organizations and stakeholders responsible for leading security or public health response, these roles are non-overlapping and are led by organizations not with limited interaction outside such events. The lack of mandates highlights a gap in the mechanisms available to coordinate response and a gap in guidance for managing the response. The results of the analysis corroborate anecdotal evidence from stakeholder meetings and highlight a critical need and gap in deliberate biological response policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6310771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63107712019-01-02 Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events Katz, Rebecca Graeden, Ellie Abe, Keishi Attal-Juncqua, Aurelia Boyce, Matthew R. Eaneff, Stephanie Heliyon Article BACKGROUND: Recent infectious disease outbreaks have brought increased attention to the need to strengthen global capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to natural biological threats. However, deliberate biological events also represent a significant global threat, but have received relatively little attention. While the Biological Weapons Convention provides a foundation for the response to deliberate biological events, the political mechanisms to respond to and recover from such an event are poorly defined. METHODS: We performed an analysis of the epidemiological timeline, the international policies triggered as a notional deliberate biological event unfolds, and the corresponding stakeholders and mandates assigned by each policy. FINDINGS: The results of this analysis identify a significant gap in both policy and stakeholder mandates: there is no single policy nor stakeholder mandate for leading and coordinating response activities associated with a deliberate biological event. These results were visualized using an open source web-based tool published at https://dbe.talusanalytics.com. INTERPRETATION: While there are organizations and stakeholders responsible for leading security or public health response, these roles are non-overlapping and are led by organizations not with limited interaction outside such events. The lack of mandates highlights a gap in the mechanisms available to coordinate response and a gap in guidance for managing the response. The results of the analysis corroborate anecdotal evidence from stakeholder meetings and highlight a critical need and gap in deliberate biological response policy. Elsevier 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6310771/ /pubmed/30603719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01091 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Katz, Rebecca
Graeden, Ellie
Abe, Keishi
Attal-Juncqua, Aurelia
Boyce, Matthew R.
Eaneff, Stephanie
Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
title Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
title_full Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
title_fullStr Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
title_full_unstemmed Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
title_short Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
title_sort mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30603719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01091
work_keys_str_mv AT katzrebecca mappingstakeholdersandpoliciesinresponsetodeliberatebiologicalevents
AT graedenellie mappingstakeholdersandpoliciesinresponsetodeliberatebiologicalevents
AT abekeishi mappingstakeholdersandpoliciesinresponsetodeliberatebiologicalevents
AT attaljuncquaaurelia mappingstakeholdersandpoliciesinresponsetodeliberatebiologicalevents
AT boycematthewr mappingstakeholdersandpoliciesinresponsetodeliberatebiologicalevents
AT eaneffstephanie mappingstakeholdersandpoliciesinresponsetodeliberatebiologicalevents