Cargando…

Target‐Adverse Event Profiles to Augment Pharmacovigilance: A Pilot Study With Six New Molecular Entities

Clinical trials can fail to detect rare adverse events (AEs). We assessed the ability of pharmacological target adverse‐event (TAE) profiles to predict AEs on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels at least 4 years after approval. TAE profiles were generated by aggregating AEs from the FD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schotland, Peter, Racz, Rebecca, Jackson, David, Levin, Robert, Strauss, David G., Burkhart, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30354029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12356
Descripción
Sumario:Clinical trials can fail to detect rare adverse events (AEs). We assessed the ability of pharmacological target adverse‐event (TAE) profiles to predict AEs on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels at least 4 years after approval. TAE profiles were generated by aggregating AEs from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) reports and the FDA drug labels for drugs that hit a common target. A genetic algorithm (GA) was used to choose the adverse event (AE) case count (N), disproportionality score in FAERS (proportional reporting ratio (PRR)), and percent of comparator drug labels with an AE to maximize F‐measure. With FAERS data alone, precision, recall, and specificity were 0.57, 0.78, and 0.61, respectively. After including FDA drug label data, precision, recall, and specificity improved to 0.67, 0.81, and 0.71, respectively. Eighteen of 23 (78%) postmarket label changes were identified correctly. TAE analysis shows promise as a method to predict AEs at the time of drug approval.