Cargando…

Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia

BACKGROUND: The global Choosing Wisely campaign has identified the following psychotropic prescribing as low-value (harmful or wasteful): (1) benzodiazepine use in the elderly, (2) antipsychotic use in dementia and (3) prescribing two or more antipsychotics concurrently. We aimed to quantify the ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brett, Jonathan, Zoega, Helga, Buckley, Nicholas A., Daniels, Benjamin J., Elshaug, Adam G., Pearson, Sallie-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3811-5
_version_ 1783383521068318720
author Brett, Jonathan
Zoega, Helga
Buckley, Nicholas A.
Daniels, Benjamin J.
Elshaug, Adam G.
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
author_facet Brett, Jonathan
Zoega, Helga
Buckley, Nicholas A.
Daniels, Benjamin J.
Elshaug, Adam G.
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
author_sort Brett, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global Choosing Wisely campaign has identified the following psychotropic prescribing as low-value (harmful or wasteful): (1) benzodiazepine use in the elderly, (2) antipsychotic use in dementia and (3) prescribing two or more antipsychotics concurrently. We aimed to quantify the extent of these prescribing practices in the Australian population. METHODS: We applied indicators to dispensing claims of a 10% random sample of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme beneficiaries to quantify annual rates of each low-value practice from 2013 to 2016. We also assessed patient factors and direct medicine costs (extrapolated to the entire Australian population) associated with each practice in 2016. RESULTS: We observed little change in the rates of the three practices between 2013 and 2016. In 2016, 15.3% of people aged ≥65 years were prescribed a benzodiazepine, 0.5% were prescribed antipsychotics in the context of dementia and 0.2% of people aged ≥18 years received two or more antipsychotics concurrently. The likelihood of elderly people receiving benzodiazepines or antipsychotics in the context of dementia increased with age and the likelihood of receiving all three practices increased with comorbidity burden. In 2016, direct medicine costs to the government of all three practices combined, extrapolated to national figures, were > $21 million AUD. CONCLUSIONS: Our indicators suggest that the frequency of these three practices has not changed appreciably in recent years and that they incur significant costs. Worryingly, people with the greatest risk of harm from these prescribing practices are often the most likely to receive them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3811-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6310957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63109572019-01-07 Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia Brett, Jonathan Zoega, Helga Buckley, Nicholas A. Daniels, Benjamin J. Elshaug, Adam G. Pearson, Sallie-Anne BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The global Choosing Wisely campaign has identified the following psychotropic prescribing as low-value (harmful or wasteful): (1) benzodiazepine use in the elderly, (2) antipsychotic use in dementia and (3) prescribing two or more antipsychotics concurrently. We aimed to quantify the extent of these prescribing practices in the Australian population. METHODS: We applied indicators to dispensing claims of a 10% random sample of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme beneficiaries to quantify annual rates of each low-value practice from 2013 to 2016. We also assessed patient factors and direct medicine costs (extrapolated to the entire Australian population) associated with each practice in 2016. RESULTS: We observed little change in the rates of the three practices between 2013 and 2016. In 2016, 15.3% of people aged ≥65 years were prescribed a benzodiazepine, 0.5% were prescribed antipsychotics in the context of dementia and 0.2% of people aged ≥18 years received two or more antipsychotics concurrently. The likelihood of elderly people receiving benzodiazepines or antipsychotics in the context of dementia increased with age and the likelihood of receiving all three practices increased with comorbidity burden. In 2016, direct medicine costs to the government of all three practices combined, extrapolated to national figures, were > $21 million AUD. CONCLUSIONS: Our indicators suggest that the frequency of these three practices has not changed appreciably in recent years and that they incur significant costs. Worryingly, people with the greatest risk of harm from these prescribing practices are often the most likely to receive them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3811-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6310957/ /pubmed/30594192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3811-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brett, Jonathan
Zoega, Helga
Buckley, Nicholas A.
Daniels, Benjamin J.
Elshaug, Adam G.
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia
title Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia
title_full Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia
title_fullStr Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia
title_short Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia
title_sort choosing wisely? quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6310957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3811-5
work_keys_str_mv AT brettjonathan choosingwiselyquantifyingtheextentofthreelowvaluepsychotropicprescribingpracticesinaustralia
AT zoegahelga choosingwiselyquantifyingtheextentofthreelowvaluepsychotropicprescribingpracticesinaustralia
AT buckleynicholasa choosingwiselyquantifyingtheextentofthreelowvaluepsychotropicprescribingpracticesinaustralia
AT danielsbenjaminj choosingwiselyquantifyingtheextentofthreelowvaluepsychotropicprescribingpracticesinaustralia
AT elshaugadamg choosingwiselyquantifyingtheextentofthreelowvaluepsychotropicprescribingpracticesinaustralia
AT pearsonsallieanne choosingwiselyquantifyingtheextentofthreelowvaluepsychotropicprescribingpracticesinaustralia