Cargando…

Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Using outcome measures to advance healthcare continues to be of widespread interest. The goal is to summarize the results of studies which use outcome measures from clinical registries to implement and monitor QI initiatives. The second objective is to identify a) facilitators and/or bar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kampstra, Nynke A., Zipfel, Nina, van der Nat, Paul B., Westert, Gert P., van der Wees, Philip J., Groenewoud, A. Stef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3828-9
_version_ 1783383546035961856
author Kampstra, Nynke A.
Zipfel, Nina
van der Nat, Paul B.
Westert, Gert P.
van der Wees, Philip J.
Groenewoud, A. Stef
author_facet Kampstra, Nynke A.
Zipfel, Nina
van der Nat, Paul B.
Westert, Gert P.
van der Wees, Philip J.
Groenewoud, A. Stef
author_sort Kampstra, Nynke A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using outcome measures to advance healthcare continues to be of widespread interest. The goal is to summarize the results of studies which use outcome measures from clinical registries to implement and monitor QI initiatives. The second objective is to identify a) facilitators and/or barriers that contribute to the realization of QI efforts, and b) how outcomes are being used as a catalyst to change outcomes over time. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for relevant articles published between January 1995 and March 2017. We used a standardized data abstraction form. Studies were included when the following three criteria were fulfilled: 1) they relied on structural data collection, 2) when a structural and comprehensive QI intervention had been implemented and evaluated, and 3) impact on improving clinical and/or patient-reported outcomes was described. Data on QI strategies, QI initiatives and the impact on outcomes was extracted using standardized assessment tools. RESULTS: We included 21 articles, of which eight showed statistically significant improvements on outcomes using data from clinical registries. Out of these eight studies, the Chronic Care Model, IT application as feedback, benchmarking and the Collaborative Care Model were used as QI methods. Encouraging trends in realizing improved outcomes through QI initiatives were observed, ranging from improving teamwork, implementation of clinical guidelines, implementation of physician alerts and development of a decision support system. Facilitators for implementing QI initiatives included a high quality database, audits, frequent reporting and feedback, patient involvement, communication, standardization, engagement, and leadership. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that outcomes collected in clinical registries are supportive to realize QI initiatives. Organizational readiness and an active approach are key in achieving improved outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3828-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63110592019-01-07 Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review Kampstra, Nynke A. Zipfel, Nina van der Nat, Paul B. Westert, Gert P. van der Wees, Philip J. Groenewoud, A. Stef BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Using outcome measures to advance healthcare continues to be of widespread interest. The goal is to summarize the results of studies which use outcome measures from clinical registries to implement and monitor QI initiatives. The second objective is to identify a) facilitators and/or barriers that contribute to the realization of QI efforts, and b) how outcomes are being used as a catalyst to change outcomes over time. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for relevant articles published between January 1995 and March 2017. We used a standardized data abstraction form. Studies were included when the following three criteria were fulfilled: 1) they relied on structural data collection, 2) when a structural and comprehensive QI intervention had been implemented and evaluated, and 3) impact on improving clinical and/or patient-reported outcomes was described. Data on QI strategies, QI initiatives and the impact on outcomes was extracted using standardized assessment tools. RESULTS: We included 21 articles, of which eight showed statistically significant improvements on outcomes using data from clinical registries. Out of these eight studies, the Chronic Care Model, IT application as feedback, benchmarking and the Collaborative Care Model were used as QI methods. Encouraging trends in realizing improved outcomes through QI initiatives were observed, ranging from improving teamwork, implementation of clinical guidelines, implementation of physician alerts and development of a decision support system. Facilitators for implementing QI initiatives included a high quality database, audits, frequent reporting and feedback, patient involvement, communication, standardization, engagement, and leadership. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that outcomes collected in clinical registries are supportive to realize QI initiatives. Organizational readiness and an active approach are key in achieving improved outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3828-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6311059/ /pubmed/30594193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3828-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kampstra, Nynke A.
Zipfel, Nina
van der Nat, Paul B.
Westert, Gert P.
van der Wees, Philip J.
Groenewoud, A. Stef
Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
title Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
title_full Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
title_fullStr Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
title_short Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
title_sort health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3828-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kampstranynkea healthoutcomesmeasurementandorganizationalreadinesssupportqualityimprovementasystematicreview
AT zipfelnina healthoutcomesmeasurementandorganizationalreadinesssupportqualityimprovementasystematicreview
AT vandernatpaulb healthoutcomesmeasurementandorganizationalreadinesssupportqualityimprovementasystematicreview
AT westertgertp healthoutcomesmeasurementandorganizationalreadinesssupportqualityimprovementasystematicreview
AT vanderweesphilipj healthoutcomesmeasurementandorganizationalreadinesssupportqualityimprovementasystematicreview
AT groenewoudastef healthoutcomesmeasurementandorganizationalreadinesssupportqualityimprovementasystematicreview