Cargando…
Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013
BACKGROUND: Comparing the mortality profiles of dialysis centres is important to ensure that high standards of care are maintained. We compare the performance of dialysis centres in Australia and New Zealand in their treatment of haemodialysis patients, accounting for the competing risks of kidney t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3832-0 |
_version_ | 1783383549164912640 |
---|---|
author | Kasza, Jessica Polkinghorne, Kevan R. Wolfe, Rory McDonald, Stephen P. Marshall, Mark R. |
author_facet | Kasza, Jessica Polkinghorne, Kevan R. Wolfe, Rory McDonald, Stephen P. Marshall, Mark R. |
author_sort | Kasza, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparing the mortality profiles of dialysis centres is important to ensure that high standards of care are maintained. We compare the performance of dialysis centres in Australia and New Zealand in their treatment of haemodialysis patients, accounting for the competing risks of kidney transplantation and transfer to peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: Observational cohort study. We included data from all adult patients (5574 patients) commencing haemodialysis at home or in a facility between 2008 and 2010 across 62 dialysis centres, from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Standardised mortality ratios were calculated by estimating mortality probabilities from a pooled random effects logistic regression model, accounting for the competing risk of transplantation using an inverse probability weighting approach. Models were adjusted for patient comorbidities, sex, height, weight, late referral to a nephrologist, age, race, primary kidney disease, smoking status, and serum creatinine (μmol/l). RESULTS: Two dialysis centres were found to have relatively higher levels of risk-adjusted mortality lying outside the prediction intervals for “usual” performance. Risk adjusted mortality rates were not associated with centres’ compliance with guidelines for vascular access and biochemical and haematological targets. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that standardised mortality ratios are useful to identify facilities that have statistically outlying mortality risk. Our criterion for determining whether a centre has better or worse performance than expected is statistical, and thus analyses such as ours can serve only as a screening tool, and are only one aspect of assessment of “quality” of performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3832-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6311072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63110722019-01-07 Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 Kasza, Jessica Polkinghorne, Kevan R. Wolfe, Rory McDonald, Stephen P. Marshall, Mark R. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Comparing the mortality profiles of dialysis centres is important to ensure that high standards of care are maintained. We compare the performance of dialysis centres in Australia and New Zealand in their treatment of haemodialysis patients, accounting for the competing risks of kidney transplantation and transfer to peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: Observational cohort study. We included data from all adult patients (5574 patients) commencing haemodialysis at home or in a facility between 2008 and 2010 across 62 dialysis centres, from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Standardised mortality ratios were calculated by estimating mortality probabilities from a pooled random effects logistic regression model, accounting for the competing risk of transplantation using an inverse probability weighting approach. Models were adjusted for patient comorbidities, sex, height, weight, late referral to a nephrologist, age, race, primary kidney disease, smoking status, and serum creatinine (μmol/l). RESULTS: Two dialysis centres were found to have relatively higher levels of risk-adjusted mortality lying outside the prediction intervals for “usual” performance. Risk adjusted mortality rates were not associated with centres’ compliance with guidelines for vascular access and biochemical and haematological targets. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that standardised mortality ratios are useful to identify facilities that have statistically outlying mortality risk. Our criterion for determining whether a centre has better or worse performance than expected is statistical, and thus analyses such as ours can serve only as a screening tool, and are only one aspect of assessment of “quality” of performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3832-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6311072/ /pubmed/30594187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3832-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kasza, Jessica Polkinghorne, Kevan R. Wolfe, Rory McDonald, Stephen P. Marshall, Mark R. Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
title | Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
title_full | Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
title_fullStr | Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
title_short | Comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across Australia and New Zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
title_sort | comparing dialysis centre mortality outcomes across australia and new zealand: identifying unusually performing centres 2008–2013 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30594187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3832-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaszajessica comparingdialysiscentremortalityoutcomesacrossaustraliaandnewzealandidentifyingunusuallyperformingcentres20082013 AT polkinghornekevanr comparingdialysiscentremortalityoutcomesacrossaustraliaandnewzealandidentifyingunusuallyperformingcentres20082013 AT wolferory comparingdialysiscentremortalityoutcomesacrossaustraliaandnewzealandidentifyingunusuallyperformingcentres20082013 AT mcdonaldstephenp comparingdialysiscentremortalityoutcomesacrossaustraliaandnewzealandidentifyingunusuallyperformingcentres20082013 AT marshallmarkr comparingdialysiscentremortalityoutcomesacrossaustraliaandnewzealandidentifyingunusuallyperformingcentres20082013 |