Cargando…

Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites

BACKGROUND: Hospital websites are important sources for patients to access health information. AIM: The purpose of this study was to develop the quality evaluation model for hospital websites. METHODS: The quantitative study was conducted through the modified Delphi method in 2014-2015. The populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farrahi, Razieh, Gilasi, Hamidreza, Khademi, Sahar, Chopannejad, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30692713
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.274-279
_version_ 1783383553717829632
author Farrahi, Razieh
Gilasi, Hamidreza
Khademi, Sahar
Chopannejad, Sara
author_facet Farrahi, Razieh
Gilasi, Hamidreza
Khademi, Sahar
Chopannejad, Sara
author_sort Farrahi, Razieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital websites are important sources for patients to access health information. AIM: The purpose of this study was to develop the quality evaluation model for hospital websites. METHODS: The quantitative study was conducted through the modified Delphi method in 2014-2015. The population of the study includes 10 experts were chosen by targeting non-randomized method. A questionnaire was prepared based on the prototype that was developed by research papers and related models. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by face validity and CVI and CVR estimation. Reliability was obtained by split-half method (α = 0.8). Experts’ opinions were collected through interview. Then, their frequency and percentage were determined. Items with options completely agree and agree over 75% was approved, items below 50% were removed, and items 50%–75% were removed after three interviews repetitions. RESULTS: Most of the experts agreed about the pleasant and harmonious colors, the readable and consistent fonts (100%). The least frequency was allocated to correct grammar and words, support for multilingual and rapidly changing of displaying pages in the website with a frequency of 2 (20%). CONCLUSION: The minimum qualitative criteria for a website are usability, efficiency, user friendly, service, reliability and interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63111142019-01-28 Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites Farrahi, Razieh Gilasi, Hamidreza Khademi, Sahar Chopannejad, Sara Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Hospital websites are important sources for patients to access health information. AIM: The purpose of this study was to develop the quality evaluation model for hospital websites. METHODS: The quantitative study was conducted through the modified Delphi method in 2014-2015. The population of the study includes 10 experts were chosen by targeting non-randomized method. A questionnaire was prepared based on the prototype that was developed by research papers and related models. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by face validity and CVI and CVR estimation. Reliability was obtained by split-half method (α = 0.8). Experts’ opinions were collected through interview. Then, their frequency and percentage were determined. Items with options completely agree and agree over 75% was approved, items below 50% were removed, and items 50%–75% were removed after three interviews repetitions. RESULTS: Most of the experts agreed about the pleasant and harmonious colors, the readable and consistent fonts (100%). The least frequency was allocated to correct grammar and words, support for multilingual and rapidly changing of displaying pages in the website with a frequency of 2 (20%). CONCLUSION: The minimum qualitative criteria for a website are usability, efficiency, user friendly, service, reliability and interaction. Academy of Medical sciences 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6311114/ /pubmed/30692713 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.274-279 Text en © 2018 Razieh Farrahi, Hamidreza Gilasi, Sahar Khademi, Sara Chopannejad http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Farrahi, Razieh
Gilasi, Hamidreza
Khademi, Sahar
Chopannejad, Sara
Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites
title Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites
title_full Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites
title_fullStr Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites
title_short Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites
title_sort towards a comprehensive quality evaluation model for hospital websites
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30692713
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.274-279
work_keys_str_mv AT farrahirazieh towardsacomprehensivequalityevaluationmodelforhospitalwebsites
AT gilasihamidreza towardsacomprehensivequalityevaluationmodelforhospitalwebsites
AT khademisahar towardsacomprehensivequalityevaluationmodelforhospitalwebsites
AT chopannejadsara towardsacomprehensivequalityevaluationmodelforhospitalwebsites