Cargando…

The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement

INTRODUCTION: The carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) is a marker for pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma. In our study, we have investigated the level of CA 19-9 at 50 patients with benign and malign disease using three immunoassays. METHODS: The COBAS e 601 (Roche) uses an ECLIA, Architect i2000 analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Serdarevic, Nafija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30692705
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.235-239
_version_ 1783383573987852288
author Serdarevic, Nafija
author_facet Serdarevic, Nafija
author_sort Serdarevic, Nafija
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) is a marker for pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma. In our study, we have investigated the level of CA 19-9 at 50 patients with benign and malign disease using three immunoassays. METHODS: The COBAS e 601 (Roche) uses an ECLIA, Architect i2000 analyzer (Abbott) uses CMIA and VITROS 5600 uses integrated System Intellicheck Technology with cut off 0.0-37.0 U/mL for determination of CA 19-9. Results were with a statistical significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Comparison of CA19-9 on COBAS with Architect show correlation coefficient R = 0.708. The results showed a regression line between immunoassay in patients with CA 19-9 treatment of y (Cobas) = 16.14 x (Architect) + 0.53. The comparison of CA19-9 on Architect and Cobas show correlation coefficient R = 0.709. The results showed regression line between immunoassay in patients with CA 19-9 treatment of y (Vitros) =–5.558 + 2.432 x (Architect) and correlation coefficient R = 0. 990. The mean concentration of CA 19-9 in the CMIA method was 41.49 U/mL, Intellicheck Technology was 103.45 U/mL and using ECLIA method was 47.25 U/mL at patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be monitored on a single method to avoid differences in the results. The various immunoassay techniques for the detection of CA 19-9 tumor marker using different monoclonal antibodies, which leads to different results. Different antibodies recognize different parts of the molecule, and antigen heterogeneity may account in part for inter-method differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63112312019-01-28 The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement Serdarevic, Nafija Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) is a marker for pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma. In our study, we have investigated the level of CA 19-9 at 50 patients with benign and malign disease using three immunoassays. METHODS: The COBAS e 601 (Roche) uses an ECLIA, Architect i2000 analyzer (Abbott) uses CMIA and VITROS 5600 uses integrated System Intellicheck Technology with cut off 0.0-37.0 U/mL for determination of CA 19-9. Results were with a statistical significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Comparison of CA19-9 on COBAS with Architect show correlation coefficient R = 0.708. The results showed a regression line between immunoassay in patients with CA 19-9 treatment of y (Cobas) = 16.14 x (Architect) + 0.53. The comparison of CA19-9 on Architect and Cobas show correlation coefficient R = 0.709. The results showed regression line between immunoassay in patients with CA 19-9 treatment of y (Vitros) =–5.558 + 2.432 x (Architect) and correlation coefficient R = 0. 990. The mean concentration of CA 19-9 in the CMIA method was 41.49 U/mL, Intellicheck Technology was 103.45 U/mL and using ECLIA method was 47.25 U/mL at patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be monitored on a single method to avoid differences in the results. The various immunoassay techniques for the detection of CA 19-9 tumor marker using different monoclonal antibodies, which leads to different results. Different antibodies recognize different parts of the molecule, and antigen heterogeneity may account in part for inter-method differences. Academy of Medical sciences 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6311231/ /pubmed/30692705 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.235-239 Text en © 2018 Nafija Serdarevic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Serdarevic, Nafija
The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement
title The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement
title_full The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement
title_fullStr The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement
title_short The Comparison Between Different Immunoassays for Serum Carbohydrate Antigen (CA 19-9) Concentration Measurement
title_sort comparison between different immunoassays for serum carbohydrate antigen (ca 19-9) concentration measurement
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30692705
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.235-239
work_keys_str_mv AT serdarevicnafija thecomparisonbetweendifferentimmunoassaysforserumcarbohydrateantigenca199concentrationmeasurement
AT serdarevicnafija comparisonbetweendifferentimmunoassaysforserumcarbohydrateantigenca199concentrationmeasurement