Cargando…

Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study

We aimed to investigate the effects of mammary gland density and average glandular dose (AGD) on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of breast-equivalent phantoms with different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios. Full-field digital-mammography breast X-rays were performed on breast-equivalent phantoms with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Noriko, Okafuji, Yuka, Adachi, Saori, Takahashi, Kana, Nakakuma, Takashi, Ueno, Sohichirou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30643646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6192594
_version_ 1783383574958833664
author Nakamura, Noriko
Okafuji, Yuka
Adachi, Saori
Takahashi, Kana
Nakakuma, Takashi
Ueno, Sohichirou
author_facet Nakamura, Noriko
Okafuji, Yuka
Adachi, Saori
Takahashi, Kana
Nakakuma, Takashi
Ueno, Sohichirou
author_sort Nakamura, Noriko
collection PubMed
description We aimed to investigate the effects of mammary gland density and average glandular dose (AGD) on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of breast-equivalent phantoms with different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios. Full-field digital-mammography breast X-rays were performed on breast-equivalent phantoms with three different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios (Phantom A [30/70], Phantom B [50/50], and Phantom C [70/30]) and seven thicknesses ranging from 10 mm to 70 mm. The prediction formula for the CNR was calculated by multivariate analysis and the effects of the various parameters on CNR were evaluated using a multiple regression analysis model. Higher CNR values were obtained with lower mammary gland/fat tissue ratios and lower phantom thicknesses. Variation in CNR among the three breast models was low (coefficient of variation, 3.4–8.7%) at lower phantom thicknesses (10–30 mm) and high (coefficient of variation, 10.5–16.8%) at higher phantom thickness (50–70 mm). CNR showed a strong negative correlation (r = -0.8989) with AGD across all three mammary gland ratios. A predictive formula for CNR using AGD and mammary gland density was developed. CNR can be predicted with high precision using AGD and mammary gland density. The predicted CNR could be used to measure the diagnostic reliability of mammography in breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63112352019-01-14 Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study Nakamura, Noriko Okafuji, Yuka Adachi, Saori Takahashi, Kana Nakakuma, Takashi Ueno, Sohichirou Radiol Res Pract Research Article We aimed to investigate the effects of mammary gland density and average glandular dose (AGD) on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of breast-equivalent phantoms with different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios. Full-field digital-mammography breast X-rays were performed on breast-equivalent phantoms with three different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios (Phantom A [30/70], Phantom B [50/50], and Phantom C [70/30]) and seven thicknesses ranging from 10 mm to 70 mm. The prediction formula for the CNR was calculated by multivariate analysis and the effects of the various parameters on CNR were evaluated using a multiple regression analysis model. Higher CNR values were obtained with lower mammary gland/fat tissue ratios and lower phantom thicknesses. Variation in CNR among the three breast models was low (coefficient of variation, 3.4–8.7%) at lower phantom thicknesses (10–30 mm) and high (coefficient of variation, 10.5–16.8%) at higher phantom thickness (50–70 mm). CNR showed a strong negative correlation (r = -0.8989) with AGD across all three mammary gland ratios. A predictive formula for CNR using AGD and mammary gland density was developed. CNR can be predicted with high precision using AGD and mammary gland density. The predicted CNR could be used to measure the diagnostic reliability of mammography in breast cancer. Hindawi 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6311235/ /pubmed/30643646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6192594 Text en Copyright © 2018 Noriko Nakamura et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakamura, Noriko
Okafuji, Yuka
Adachi, Saori
Takahashi, Kana
Nakakuma, Takashi
Ueno, Sohichirou
Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study
title Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study
title_full Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study
title_fullStr Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study
title_short Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study
title_sort effect of different breast densities and average glandular dose on contrast to noise ratios in full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30643646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6192594
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamuranoriko effectofdifferentbreastdensitiesandaverageglandulardoseoncontrasttonoiseratiosinfullfielddigitalmammographysimulationandphantomstudy
AT okafujiyuka effectofdifferentbreastdensitiesandaverageglandulardoseoncontrasttonoiseratiosinfullfielddigitalmammographysimulationandphantomstudy
AT adachisaori effectofdifferentbreastdensitiesandaverageglandulardoseoncontrasttonoiseratiosinfullfielddigitalmammographysimulationandphantomstudy
AT takahashikana effectofdifferentbreastdensitiesandaverageglandulardoseoncontrasttonoiseratiosinfullfielddigitalmammographysimulationandphantomstudy
AT nakakumatakashi effectofdifferentbreastdensitiesandaverageglandulardoseoncontrasttonoiseratiosinfullfielddigitalmammographysimulationandphantomstudy
AT uenosohichirou effectofdifferentbreastdensitiesandaverageglandulardoseoncontrasttonoiseratiosinfullfielddigitalmammographysimulationandphantomstudy